Value-Based Reimbursement

Retrospective reimbursement method was based on actual cost the providers assumed the previous year. On this method rates were evaluated retrospectively and costs were used to determined the amount paid to the provider and had no incentive to control cost. On the other hand, prospective reimbursement methods can determine in advance how much a provider is going to get compensated. (Shi & Sing, 2017) The way retrospective reimbursement contain perverse financial incentives happened when institutions increased their profits by increasing costs and this system payment method was based on costs. Due to this issue the method was changed to the prospective to avoid abuse of the system.

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (HCAHPS) began in 2006 with a 27 question survey that is distributed to discharged patients. This survey process was originally designed to help patients compare hospitals in their area to be able to make an informed choice for their healthcare needs. In January 2013, five additional questions were added to the survey. Beginning this year, Medicare reimbursement rates to a hospital are tied to the hospital’s patient satisfaction scores. Therefore, hospitals are continually looking for ways to improve

Value-Based Purchasing which is part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; the program allows healthcare providers to get incentive payments for quality of care they provide to Medicare beneficiaries; for doctors it could mean doing less mean decrease in revenue and lower salary for the doctors. Therefore, value-based care has its pros and cons based who you talk to.

It is important to follow payer guidelines when completing a claim form; otherwise, reimbursement will be delayed until the form is corrected.

Healthcare is in a constant state of change with movements that impact rates, access and quality of care. Hospitals have become more competitive due to the rising cost of care delivery and the reduction in reimbursement from payers. This causes difficulty in delivering quality care to all patients, which is being measured by mandated patient perception surveys, Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). HCAHPS scores are part of value

In 2012, the ACA found an excessive amount of readmissions of patients that were hospitalized within 30 days for the same medical conditions. This factor viewed under the ACA as a quality issue and CMS implemented value-based incentive payments based on performance in a set of quality measures. The plan is to implement a pay for performance (P4P) in formulas used by Medicare to reimbursement providers. “The objective is to link reimbursement to quality and efficiency as an incentive to improve the quality of health care, as well as reduce system-wide costs” (Shi and Singh, 2015). In addition to the P4P, nonprofit hospitals also focus on continual improvement, data and cost containment throughout the organization (Adamopoulos,

The change to value based purchasing has bought many challenges to the healthcare industry. With the change to value-based purchasing for payments, it has changed how healthcare organization receive payment and delivery care. The advantage of have value based purchasing is that it improves the quality of care while reducing cost in an effort of aligning patient’s with the right provider and treatment plan (Minemyer, Jun 29, 2016). However, there are many disadvantages, such as it increases the patient volume as counteracting the reduction of procedure volume (Brown, B. & Crapo, 2016). Also it makes providers more responsible for care that is beyond the expected treatment of care needed (Minemyer, Jun 29, 2016). With quality measures tied

Unit 2 AssignmentKelley WhitcombKaplan UniversityHI215-01: Reimbursement MethodologiesProfessor Kathleen SobelJuly 20, 2015Medicaid is one of the biggest insurance plans you can get in any state. In the state of Indiana, it is based off of your income. There is a certain amount (income) you have to make to determine if you will receive Medicaid or Healthy Indiana Plan (HIP). HIP is still a form of Medicaid, but you would have to pay monthly cost for it and have certain set of co-pays for certain services that is needed. HIP Plus is the recommended plan for members as it provides health coverage for a low, predictable monthly cost. HIP Plus also covers dental and vision services. If you do not pay your monthly payment you can be removed from

In the past several years, there have been several changes in economic policy at federal and state levels. The two economic policies that present to be the most precedent for healthcare leaders with concern to facility reimbursement are the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the switch from volume to value reimbursement. First, there is the ACA policy, which have affected healthcare facilities and their reimbursement methods. In fact, ever since this policy was implemented, provider reimbursement has started to decrease in terms of fee-for-service payments (The Common-Wealth Fund, 2015). In other words, the intention of this policy was to provide budget relief to the government payers as well as giving providers an incentive to provider patients with great quality of care.

They will now receive payments from the quality of care they provide to their patients. Those with higher based value will receive higher payments than their counterparts (Berenson 2010). I think this is very important because the healthcare system has been volume driven for so long that quality healthcare has been an issue for quite some time. In addition to value, this would definitely improve quality and efficiency needed for better patient outcomes.

According to L. Horton, LTACHs are funded by commercial insurance, Medicare, and charity (personal communication, March 7, 2014). For claims reimbursed by Medicare, patient satisfaction survey’s or Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems/HCAHPS help determine the hospital’s reimbursement scores. Value Based Purchasing (VBP) was established by the Affordable Care Act, which implements a pay-for-performance approach to the Medicare payment system (“Linking Quality to Payment,” n.d.). This program can help hospitals evaluate the performance of the services they provide to the public. Part of the VBP plan includes a questionnaire to patients that determines 30% of the weight of the hospital’s reimbursement scores. There are eight measures included in the HCAPS: nursing communication, doctor communication, responsiveness of staff, pain management, communication of medications, discharge information, cleanliness and quietness of hospital environment, and overall rating (Grellner, 2012, p.57).

The DOJ and HHS created the Stop Medicare Fraud website, which provides information about how to recognize and protect against Medicare and Medicaid misrepresentation and how to report it. In conclusion, the government has moved away from the inefficient and costly fee-for-service payment type and moved toward the value-based reimbursements for health services to help increase patient care and quality outcomes. I believe the FCA and AKS regulatory laws are able of guarding against overutilization, raised costs, and poor quality of care and I look forward to this being debated in the

One major trend in the healthcare environment is the shift from volume based reimbursement towards value based reimbursement. Many provider practices remain on a volume based or fee for service reimbursement plan. This system tends to reward high quantity of services with less regard for the quality or performance of the service. However, with a renewed focus on value, reimbursement plans

(Earlier this month I noticed an extra deposit in my account from Seidler. I assumed it was a commission check but then I later noticed another extra deposit….?)

The positive outcomes that have resulted due to value base programs have caused the model to gain traction and ignite one of the largest changes in history in the health care marketplace. By linking reimbursements to service quality, insurers such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have facilitated a massive leap forward in the performance of United States health care providers. This achievement is a considerable accomplishment in the face of an institution that has received reimbursement from insurers via a fee-for-service model during the last 75 years. Soon, valued based payment models will represent the norm as more insurers support initiatives such as shared savings program, integrated clinical care, and accountable care payment models.