As the shirtwaist with skirts became fashionable for college women to wear outside, wearing gym suit outfits outside the gymnasium was not acceptable. The loose fitting, functional but unfashionable gym uniforms were only allowed when other women were present. No men were permitted to see a woman in a gym uniform and without a corset on her waist. Hence, women’s colleges like Vassar College had gym costumes since the 1860s or earlier and updated the attire. The two Vassar student Adelaide Mansfield described her first purchased gym suit in 1893:
We got our gym suits Saturday. They cost seven dollars, which I think is a good deal. They are full trousers and a blouse waist, with underclothes. The stuff is dark blue flammel, trimmed with black braid. They are pretty well made, I thin the buttons all sewed on tight and button holes well made and the braid is sewed on straight enough to suit Edie. I don’t know
…show more content…
Felix Fuld recognized the dangers of women wearing gym suits that consisted of additional material. As he explained, “ Not only do the fullness of the blouse and the fullness of the bloomers cause physical discomfort to the wearer unnecessary disquietude because of the existing conditions at the knee and at the waist, but the costume is outrageously unhygienic.” The debut of two pieces of clothing remedied the cleanness issues in gymnasium outfits. Florence Bolton, the director of the women’s gymnasium at Stanford University, devised a one-piece suit with no belt and waist, aptly called the Bolton suit. Based on the British gymnasium slip, while including the bloomer, this suit was sleeveless and at knee length. It consisted of a square-necked with a straight yoke that held box pleats front and back. For additional hygienic appeal, a shirt was underneath the suit. Felix Fuld described the benefits Bolton suit and its undershirt called a “washable
A zoot suit is a men’s suit with high wasted wide legged, tight cuffed, and a long coat with wide padded shoulders. This style was worn in the city of los Angeles during the 1930s and 1940 zoot suit were mostly worn by poor and working class Mexican Americans.
In the article, “The Battle Over Dress Codes” written by Peggy Orenstein, explains the dress code of Berkley Middle School from a mother’s point of view. This mother of argues that young girls who are reaching puberty and whose bodies are growing, are being told to cover up once they start to develope. She says, “In May, students in Utah high school opened their yearbooks to discover digitally raised necklines and sleeve added to female classmates’ shirts.” I find this act highly deceitful and unnecessary. If i was that student or that student’s parent, I’d be very upset. Orenstein also states that “seductiveness” has been an issue for girls, which has become politicized. Although, no matter how we’re dressed, there is no excuse for catcalls from older men. Orenstein says, “I don’t want her to feel shame in her soon-to-be-emerging
2Traditional suits have low versatility as they are expected to be worn as a ‘whole’ suit (or uniform).
The female apologetic suggests that female athletic involvement is tolerable as long as traditional notions of femininity are present (Pierman, 2005; Roth & Basow,2004). The AAGPBL had to present femininity to the public by wearing feminine uniforms, having charm, and code of conduct. The overall look of the uniform was intended to remind fans that they were not only watching real baseball, but real girls (Draeger, 1997). Players were issued an 11-page “Guide for All-American Girls: How to Look Better, Feel Better, Be More Popular” along with a beauty kit (Charm School). They were given instructions in putting on makeup, how to get in and out of a car gracefully, how to speak correctly, and how to make proper conversations in social settings (Fincher, 1989). Clothing guidelines were issued, as well as a 10-step suggested beauty routine for after the games. Many females were denied from being able to join the AAGPBL if they looked masculine. Back then, being labeled masculine as a female meant they did not meet the expectations of beauty. This raised the question of, whether or not the exclusion of the masculine looking athletes compromised the power statistics of the league. The answer to this question still remains unknown because it is controversial.
Varsity Brands and Star Athletica both produce cheerleading uniforms. Varsity Brands copyrighted some of their uniform designs, including how some of the stripes, colors and shapes were arranged. In 2010, Varsity Brand sued Star Athletica for copyright infringement on designs found on Varsity Brand’s uniforms. The district court ruled that “the colors-and-designs component of a cheerleading uniform cannot be conceptually separated from the utilitarian object itself.” This meant that without the designs on a cheerleading uniform, it isn’t a cheerleading uniform. Essentially, without the colors and designs, it’s just a piece of fabric, like a dress. With this ruling, designs on the uniform couldn’t be copyrighted because without the designs,
The film Rosewood, made in 1997 was based on the true story of the Rosewood massacre in 1923. Rosewood was a predominantly black town in which the residents owned most of the land and businesses. After her husband severely beats her, a white woman named Fanny Taylor runs into the streets shrieking and accusing a black man of beating and raping her. Violence erupts from the white residents of the Rosewood community as they begin accusing black men of being the perpetrator or hiding the “suspect” (a man named Jesse Hunter.) There were shootings, burning down homes and the public lynchings of black men and women. In light of the attacks, some men such as Sylvester Carter stood up to the violence, as he grew weary of the treatment of his community. The film creates a strong reflection of the status of race and gender relations in the south.
The clothes not only can be worn as functional apparel in the gym, but also can be worn in the street, and that's why people love it.
Fashion in the early nineteen twenties was all about comfort. Men’s pants got wider and women stopped wearing their corsets and tight dresses, while older women of the age considered this scandalous and still held the thought that women should not show their ankle. Though the majority of adults disagreed with the fashion revolution, young women continually hiked up their skirts, stayed out late, and kept up with fashion trends. Times were changing, and thus the flapper age was born. Hemlines rose to the knee, and then later above it- exposing the muscular
In 1979, China decided to establish a one child policy which states that couples are only allowed to have one child, unless they meet certain exceptions[1].In order to understand what social impacts the one child policy has created in China it important to evaluate the history of this law. China’s decision to implement a Child policy has caused possible corruption, an abuse of women’s rights, has led to high rates of female feticide, has created a gender ratio problem for China, and has led to specific problems associated with both the elderly and younger generation. Finally, an assessment of why China’s one child policy is important to the United States allows for a full evaluation of the policy.
It is the beginning of August, the dreadful days in school have finally arrived. Since it is still ninety degrees outside and the AC can not keep up, most boys walk through the halls with shorts and cut-off tank tops. Girls, we wear long pants such as, jeans or leggings, “Why?”, you ask, Why would one ever want to wear that? Unfortunately, It is not a choice for us. Girls face the question when deciding to wear shorts, “Are these long enough, am I going to get in trouble?” Despite the warm temperatures outside and inside girls can not wear what they want, because it shows too much of their bodies. Boys? Can wear their cut-offs showing more than girls. Do they get in trouble for showing too much? The answer, usually is no. .To this day women are not equal to men in, school, the workplace, or at home. In this article, Rowena uses ethos, a very limited amount of logos, and no pathos to make an argument about the sexism towards school dress codes and how it promotes rape culture.
Originally, the district court found in favor of Star Athletica, finding that “the copyright was for such design features as chevrons, stripes, and patterns, but those could not be separated from a cheerleader uniform, because such an item of sportswear was indistinguishable from its design elements” (Denniston). Varsity appealed the finding to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit where they overturned the decision of the lower court. They “concluded that Varsity’s design features could be separated from the utility of the uniforms, so they were protected as pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works” (Fang). The differing interpretations and vagueness of the Copyright Act led to the Supreme Court granting certiorari on May 2, 2016.
They say that boys have a distraction problem when the girls wear shorts and leggings, but In athletics girls wear leggings and shorts, and the boys are in there. Girls can’t even be comfortable, as In wearing shorts and leggings. We go to school to learn not for a fashion show. As a girl I feel like I should be allowed to wear Nike wind shorts because I'm a very athletic person. And the high school is allowed
As the temperature rises, so do hemlines and the suspension rate. Students get suspended for violating school dress codes by wearing outfits that ‘show too much skin.’ One can argue that revealing clothing is distracting, but some families and students agree that school dress code implementations end up just shaming girls. Dress codes, the epitome of high school, teach girls to act ashamed, not modest. According to most school boards that come up with the dress code, the outfits young women wear come across as too distracting for their peers, especially men, and make it unable for women to be viewed by the public with dignity and respect. Everyday, school dress codes target females—especially females that are more developed.
Women are empowered, encouraged and even pressured into being involved in a sport or some type of fitness activities today; however, it hasn’t always been that way (Cahn 278). In the 1920s, also known as the “golden age” of sports, women and young girls faced obstacles such as rejection, gender discrimination, and stereotypes when showing interest in sports or fitness activities. One famous author named Susan Cahn, wrote a book called Coming on Strong: Gender and Sexuality in Twentieth-Century Women’s Sports, and focuses on the decades between the 1920s and the 1960s. For most of the 19th century, females were accused of causing a great deal of danger to the moral and physical areas of masculinity. Through the research of multiple different aspects, such as media, appearance, and gender roles, Cahn puts together an idea and theme that athleticism is seen as a masculine trait because it was once constructed by society itself; which fortunately for the women, that idea can be changed. In the later centuries, Cahn writes about the progress of woman 's appearance in sports, however then describes the difference in respect, attention throughout media, opportunities and wages between men and women. Through both primary sources such as newspapers, interviews, and journals, as well as secondary sources like relevant literature, Cahn writes her book in a historical non-fiction genre. After reading Coming on Strong: Gender and Sexuality in Twentieth-Century Women’s Sports by Susan
With all the presented concepts apparent, it is important to note that the suit and it’s manifestation is not restricted to only clothing, but it is rather diverse as it encompasses all of the suffering endured by any generation put into one tangible, or intangible outcome. This is evident as there are examples of forced manual labor throughout history at varying locations of the world that profited off of forced servitude such as: Africa and England. However, as the writers presented have relayed, so long as one keeps their morals and communal ideals intact, their origin, or lack of experiences has little to do with the outcome they are entitled to. But even though one may have the drive and guidance to achieve their purpose, with no assertive