Venezuelan Media Censorship Essay

freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” These are the exact words used by our country’s forefathers when they made these amendments in the late 1700’s. Ever since then there have been people trying to abolish this right by censoring

There are many domestic issues within Cuba, that is because we chose controversial countries that allowed for mass amounts of research. However issues such as human rights, brain drain, and censorship are the most prominent. First of all, human rights are constantly impeded in a repressive country like Cuba, especially the right of freedom of speech and expression. When Fidel Castro was in power, he denied people of their rights and if their opinions contrasted. This is still happening in today’s day and age where people are simply thrown in jail just for fighting for rights that should have been granted by the government. To make things worse, if the detainee later decided to stand up again to being treated wrongfully in their country, the

What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression

Censorship has evolved over time in America, from TV, books, and even the internet. America has prohibited specific things from citizen’s beliefs. The role that censorship plays in America is taken from personal beliefs, such as voting for certain things to be banned from books, TV, internet, and articles. This allows and denies things that are used for public use, due to personal preferences on things that are appropriate and inappropriate for public users.

The 1st amendment of the United States Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When the Framers of the Constitution wrote the 1st amendment there intention was exactly was to prevent the government from interfering with States’ rights. More specifically, the Framers intent was to allow citizens to speak freely without violating the law or public policy. However, the Framers did not intend the 1st amendment to be a gateway for citizens to say whatever they want, individuals can still be censored. We can find

Venezuela, located in the Latin American region, is a country that has been characterized by its abundance of oil reserve. A natural resource that has shaped the history and development of the country, affecting its economic, social and most important is political spheres. For many years Venezuela was controlled by authoritarian regimes. The country, being very important in the sense of geo-politics due to its abundance of oil, has been a key player in the international arena and most important, to those that for many years kept the country under their regime. It was not until 1958 that Venezuela experienced the change to democracy and a stable democracy was kept between the two main political parties of the time, Accion Democratica (AD)

When observing the freedom of speech it should be noted that not all speech has the same value on a scale. Lewd and obscene speech are not as thoroughly protected and claimed by constitutional immunity as seen in Chaplinsky V State of New York. The prohibition of speech which may advocate the overthrowing of the government can be just as dangerous as outlawing speech which criticizes serious defects in our government but does support the overthrowing of the government. Those who have serious concerns for government reform may stay quiet in fear of criticism and inadvertently be losing their first amendment freedoms. The court does not bear the responsibility of deciding how to manage the clash of interest, and instead respect congress decision that the avocation of overthrowing the government is speech that can be

Connections: In one paragraph, connect the theme and pieces of evidence you found within the selected reading. I believe the theme for this story is to not stray from a goal you have set out to do. In this story, Juan sets out to retrieve the letter he has sent. Keep in mind, this is his initial goal when he joins the Censorship Bureau. As time goes by, however, Juan is starting to lose track of his goal and his behavior changes. Once a person full of innocence and love, Juan is now part of the rigid system of the government. My first evidence is from the quote “After thinking it over, he reported the man to his superiors and thus got promoted." (Valenzuela 184) which shows Juan is now willing to put down others to get ahead in his job. However,

I chose to compare the freedom of the net in the United States to that of Cuba. Obviously, we have had lots of tension with Cuba in the past, and relations have been strained ever since the Cold War days. Therefore, I suspected that there would be much difference between the two countries in terms of freedom of the net. Whereas America is one of the most non-repressive countries in terms of freedoms, Cuba is one of the most repressive. Access to the Internet in the United States is almost completely unregulated. Certain laws and policies allow us to post and access almost anything that we want, and access to information is, for the most part, free from any sort of government interference. On the other hand, Cuba’s Internet users are subject

America is very fortunate that the media censorship is not as controlling as it is in autocratic countries like, Russia, Iran, or China. These countries control it by eradicating critical news and building state media brands, but we are limited to what the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allows to be broadcasted. I believe that the words we speak and media we are exposed to, should not be censored. Although some supporters of media censorship argue that the government has the right to choose what we see, a closer examination shows that media censorship proves to be unjust because the public should know what is occurring in the world, we're only exposed to half-truths, and hiding the truth hurts the interpretation of reality. Censoring

When censorship is not enough, “Cuba's best-known blogger, a prominent critic of its government, was arrested by authorities, apparently to prevent her from covering the trial of a conservative Spanish politician who is accused of causing the death of a Cuban dissident in a car crash this summer” (Fausset). The Cuban government is only working for the good of itself and not the good of the people. Yoani wants people to know the truth without the restriction of censorship and she won’t stop, “#Cuba Arrests, surveillance, and repression will not deter us from our work as journalists on @14ymedio” (Twitter). After everything she has been put through while following her passion of journalism, she is still going strong and encourages other journalists to as

Costa Rica, dubbed “the Switzerland of Central America”, unlike its neighboring countries has relatively low levels of censorship in the media ("Press Reference"). The second criteria for a free media system is it must provide “a political environment that is free from government censorship, allows open access to multiple competing sources, and is free from intimidation and violence against journalists” (Whitten-Woodring). The censorship that occurs in the media is discreet, rather indirect and rarely leads to violence. Self-censorship, due to fear of threats, is a persistent issue that journalists and editors face in Costa Rica but does not inhibit journalists from openly criticizing the government and reporting on controversial issues.

Since the international community has not majorly contributed to the resolution of the conflict until now, there are only few

First of all, this is the definition of freedom of the press from lawbrain.com. Freedom of the press guarantees the rights, “to gather, publish, and distribute information and ideas without government restriction or restraint”. Also it is

The parameters of the term censorship have been changed and manipulated very much over the years. Television and movie ratings have become more lenient against violence and indiscretion because these things are now seen as entertainment. Is this appropriate for our youth? Should children be exposed to these images so early on? How does censorship in the media affect adolescents? Children are the future of our society and need to have some understanding of real world occurrences. Ultimately, censorship can only be determined by the parents. The media cannot filter every bit of controversial images. What rights does the media have in this situation? How are their First Amendment rights applied here? As an aspiring political science