preview

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Better Essays
Open Document

Abstract
Clinical problem: Oral care and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is extremely important in all healthcare organizations and has gained increased attention. For this reason, oral care has been introduced in many hospital settings. However, there is not enough evidence on critically ill patients concerning the effect of oral care interventions on the development of VAP. In order to evaluate the effect of oral care on VAP for hospitalized patients, additional studies are required.
Objective: To determine if oral care lowers the incidence rate of hospital acquired pneumonia infection in hospitalized patients with ventilators.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the effects of oral care on ventilator-associated pneumonia for inpatient …show more content…

(2012) evaluated whether oral care by swabbing with 0.2% CHX decreases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in hospitalized patients. Patients 18 years and older were included in the study if they had no episode of chemical pneumonitis and have never been diagnosed with thrombocytopenia. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups as follows: a CHX group (n=29) and a control group (n=32). Oral care was performed by swabbing oral mucosa with either CHX or saline on sponge pellets, four times daily (at 6 AM, 12 AM, 6 PM and 12 PM). Approximately 30 mL of 0.2% CHX or saline was applied and this lasted for about 1 minute. The control group received the standard oral care (saline applications). All patients were followed for at least 14 days or until discharge from the hospital, extubation or death. The main outcome in this study was the incidence of VAP and was assessed using a mouth mirror together with a headlight. VAP was observed in 34/61 patients (55.7%) within 6.8 days. The rate of the development of VAP was significantly higher in the control group (68.8%) compared to the CHX group (41.4%) [p = 0.03] with a significant odds ratio of 3.12 (95% CI = 1.09-8.91). This study identified acinetobacter baumannii (64.7%) as the most frequent pathogen of all study …show more content…

The rate of development of VAP was significantly higher in the control group (68.8%) compared to the CHX group (41.4%) [p = 0.03] : [odds ratio = 3.12 95% CI =

Get Access