Theory of trait Verbal Aggressiveness
Justin DeRosa
Kennesaw State University
The study of Verbal Aggressiveness The trait theory of verbal aggressiveness has been studied through the last decade, with most researchers working to find a common denominator with what can be the cause. This trait usually “manifests through interpersonal messages intended to inflict psychological harm” (Bishop, Hill, & Lin, 2012, p.74.). Bishop, Hill and Lin use the “Verbal Aggressiveness Scale” (2012, p.74), which shows people more likely to attack a person's self-concepts and not their positions on the topics. (2012). This led to a look at verbal aggressiveness and the way it is formed by use of humor. Humors' intent to use as a joyful experience, however, today, there are things that some people use humor as an aggressive attack against other people. (Bishop Hill, & Lin, 2012). People today use prejudice and stereotype jokes, but “if a person uses these kinds of jokes in public discourse, (s)he
…show more content…
There was another side of verbal aggression that was beneficial called verbal benevolence (Guerrero, & Gross, 2014). Guerrero and Gross related that verbal aggression was the attack of self-concepts of a person, but verbal benevolence was to support and validate others in arguments (2014). The main point was, “do partners perceive an individual's conflict style differently depending on the traits (i.e., argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, avoidance, and verbal benevolence) that an individual possesses?”(Guerrero, & Gross, 2014, p. 100). Previous research has said that most people that are verbally aggressive attack the self-concept, however they are verbally aggressive, according to Guerrero and Gross, because of they are motivated to be superior and derogate others by using self-concept attacks
Research has identified different types of aggression to include instrumental, reactive, relational, bullying aggression (Berger, 2008; Merrell, Buchanan, & Tran, 2006; Cappella & Weinstein, 2006) and social aggression [ (Merrell, Buchanan, & Tran, 2006; Cappella & Weinstein, 2006) ].
Social Psychological Theories of Aggression Social learning theorists propose that behaviour, such as aggression is learnt through observation, imitation and behaviour shaping. This behaviour is learnt automatically through observation of male and female role models, for example parents, peers and media characters. Whether or not this behaviour is imitated depends on the type of reinforcement that the role model receives. Vicarious reinforcement involves the outcome of a role models behaviour, for example if a child observes a parent acting aggressively and receiving positive rewards for they are more like to be imitate this behaviour in the future, than they would be if the role model
Aggressions can be broadly divided in to two types: Reactive/ Impulsive aggression (RA) refers to aggression that is impulsive, emotionally charged, affective and uncontrolled. It has its theoretical roots in the frustration-tolerance theory. It is most often observed in response to a perceived threatening stimulus and is frequently accompanied by negative affect, facial expressions described as hostile, temper tantrums,
Modern society allows humorists to touch upon offensive topics without receiving much criticism. As Alain de Botton claimed in his 2004 book, Status Anxiety, humorists’ role is not merely to entertain but “to convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly.” De Botton’s argument proves legitimate. Many humorists, such as cartoonists and television hosts, decide to use their humor as a tool to prove an idea or express a belief that cannot be voiced candidly in public.
Aggressive children usually direct the behavior of others on those they think are against them. Helping the child to know that their action hurt the victims they verbally assault.
“According to Kaj Bjorkqvist, a pioneer in the field of human aggression, the development of social and verbal skills allows for "sophisticated strategies of aggression," "with the aggressor being able to harm a target person without even being identified: Those strategies may be referred to as indirect aggression” ("Sex Differ- ences," 179).”
Aggression is a natural part of human behavior, and can even be adaptive in certain situations. However, when aggression manifests itself in violent behaviors, it becomes problematic. Patterns of aggression change throughout childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood, and these changes usually differ between males and females (Loeber, 1997). Physical aggression is typically greatest early in life and decreases during adolescence, whereas more serious violence tends to increase with age, particularly during adolescence (Loeber, 1997). Despite the changes that occur in aggressive tendencies throughout childhood and adolescence, aggression is seen as a very stable trait, almost as stable as
behaviors. Longitudinal studies have proved dissimilarities between violent and non-violent behavior whereby aggressive and violent behavior were more stable.
During our lifetime every one of us feels anger and aggression occasionally, some more than others, maybe as a child in the play ground or later as an adult when somebody cuts you up when you are driving along. But what causes anger and aggression and why do we all suffer from it? Well there are lots of different theories to what causes aggression and where aggressive behaviour comes from. So throughout this essay I will examine the different concepts and theories from different psychologist and develop and show an understanding of Aggression
The concept of humor inciting change continues to be disagreed upon globally. Whereas mordant humor demands mental depth to understand the purpose, blatant impunity messages are accessible and easily created by humorists. Thus, humorists that are vital to society often rely upon humor with an underlying message. As a result, de Botton’s claim of humorists serving society is true, provided that the message is dangerous to state blatantly.
These effects of verbal aggression are not only harmful to those that are on the other end of the aggression but it can also affect the social life of the aggressor, pushing away loved ones and further angering the individual and creating a vicious circle.
Based on the theories of self-identity, aggression plays a major role where individuals seek to establish their identity. In order for individuals to identify themselves they sometimes require a form of opposition that can be manifested through aggression. In general, most of our activities as human beings are a mixture of negative and positive forms of aggression
The cognitive-neoassociation theory of aggression, otherwise known as the negative affect theory, was proposed by the American social psychologist Leonard Berkowitz. The theory suggests that certain experiences, or affects, can contribute toward the onset of aggressive feelings or behaviour. These affects can range from weather conditions (e.g. high temperatures) to unpleasant external stimuli (e.g. odours and sounds). Concurrently, the theory advocates that merely observing different types of aggressive behaviour can prompt aggression within the viewer. Given these points, an intriguing question comes to mind: might the implications of this theory be that repetitive exposure to catalysts of aggression increases a person’s inclination to be confrontational?
The aspects of my communication profile that have been validated this semester have been the Killmans result of conflict styles, my Heartland Forgiveness score, and my Verbal Aggressiveness Score. I’m foremost an avoider while compromising and accommodation are my second styles I mostly use in conflict. Since I tend to avoid and the person I am having an argument with is not letting me avoid then my verbal aggression tends to come out because, since I feel under pressure and my go-to conflict style is not working, I tend to release aggression, because I don’t like to be put in uncomfortable situations.
Previous research concerning peer aggression has been conducted under the assumption that women rarely display aggression; therefore, aggressive behavior has historically been viewed as a male phenomenon (Björkqvist, 1994). Recently, many researchers have challenged the gender bias in the existence of aggressive behaviors and have broadened the definition of aggression. Björkqvist’s research suggests sex differences exist in the quality of the aggression, but not the quantity. According to Paquette and Underwood (1999), an adolescent’s expression of anger and contempt for peers can sometimes be expressed through physical aggression, manipulation, exclusion, and/or gossip. This broader definition allows for