Verbal Reaction Times Experiment Essay

The Stroop effect was tested on four different tasks. Nineteen Queens College students were recruited by flyer, and each were assigned to a word reading task, color reading task, color inhibition task, and word inhibition task. They were timed using a stopwatch function on a cell phone, to name the color, or word to the quickest of their ability. In the order from longest reaction time to shortest: inhibition color naming task, color naming task, inhibition word reading, and word reading. This study shows that people can read words more quickly than they can name colors, and that inhibiting an automatic response to color/word tasks will take longer to do than tasks that do not involve inhibition.

The Stroop experiment by J. Ridley Stroop in 1935 was performed in order to analyze the reaction time of participant’s stimuli and desired results while also obtaining a collective result of color interference and word reading(Stroop, 1935; Lee & Chan, 2000). In the experiment three forms of the test were given, the first consisting of color patches, the second had the color words printed in black and the other was an incongruent test beaming the color did not match the color word

Controlled Vs Automatic processes: A modified version of a Stroop experiment using colour-associated and colour neutral words.

The research assessed in this article discusses the Stroop effect. The Stroop effect occurs when our selective attention fails and we are unable to attend to some information and ignore the rest. This study tests the Stroop effect by presenting the participant with a congruent or incongruent word and the participant is asked to type the color of the word or the actual word in a series of trials. In this research, it has been found that participants had faster reaction times for congruent items and slower reaction times for incongruent items. In addition, participants had faster reaction times when

While taking the Stroop test your brain is trying to say the word because words are a stronger influence than colors. This then causes conflict in your brains, mental tasks. When you look at one of the words, you are seeing both the color and an opposite meaning which forces your brain to make a decision on which one it should focus on. John Stroop’s theory is that interference happens because people can read a word faster than saying a color because color is more complex, taking more time to correctly

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effect of conflicting stimuli on a response task (Stroop effect), the results supported that it takes approximately double the time for the participants to perform condition 2 in comparison to condition 1 which indicates that there is a distinction between controlled and automatic processing in the brain. Thus the results support the Stroop experiment. In the Stroop experiment it withstood the idea that we are able to read words faster than naming colors. In relation to this experiment in particular; participants were able to read the words faster than distinguishing the font/style of the text. This is because the mind chooses to receive specific presented stimuli before any other aspects

J. Ridley Stroop created a study that explains the stroop effect in the year 1935. In two experiments, he first compared reading a list of words printed in black with reading the same list of words but this time printed incongruently (the name of the color conflicts with its ink color). At first, Stroop observed that there lies very little difference in the reading time for the two lists and that it took a little longer to name the color

Though the results may vary slightly from the original study, the overall outcome was the same; it took longer for the participants to complete the English color test versus the German color test. We can conclude reading is an automatic process and can interfere with conscious processes. One limitation of our study was the age range. Older people tend to have a more difficult time with their vision thus making it harder to distinguish between the various colors resulting in a longer reaction time. Another limitation is the setting of the test. None of the tests were conducted in a laboratory setting nor by the same person so the results may be skewed. Though the distractor made the test more difficult the overall task could be considered a low load task therefore the participant could have easily been distracted, also resulting in an increased reaction

An experiment in demonstration of this was conducted by J.R. Stroop (1935) who introduced the color naming experiment known as the Stroop Effect, where he showed that when people have to name words in different printed color it interferes with their abilities to read them efficiently. Stroop asked participants to read words as quickly as possible in one condition where words were printed in all black and in a second condition where participants had to name the ink color in which each word was printed as quickly as possible. Stroop found that the participants were much slower at naming the ink colors when they had the distracting stimuli of having it in a different color, indicating that a possible explanation for the Stroop effect is that people quickly and automatically process the meaning of the word. This would therefore interfere with the ability to process a color effectively in the second condition. In conclusion, Stroop stated that conflicting stimuli to a certain task interfere with with the person’s ability to complete it efficiently (J. R. Stroop 1935). The study is worth replicating as it shows the limitations of an essential human ability that is heavily relied on. The aim of our experiment is to investigate the effect of two contradicting stimuli on the time it takes participants to name them

In testing for the Stroop Effect, three conditions were used in a pseudo-randomized way. One such condition involved participants naming the color of a word, when the word spelled out the direct opposite of that color. For example, when a participant was presented with a green colored word, the word actually spelled out “blue”, and vice versa. This condition was called the direct conflict list. A

The psychological phenomenon called the Stroop effect was first popularized by John Ridley Stroop’s series of experiments (1935). Stroop investigated the conflicting stimuli of color identification and reading, and whether practice could diminish interference effects. His first experiment compared the speed at which it took participants to read 100 color-words printed in black ink with the same list of words printed in incongruent colors. Stroop found participants took an average 2.3 seconds longer to read black-printed words, which was, “…not reliable, which is in agreement with Peterson’s prediction made when the test was first proposed,” (p. 17). In his second experiment, Stroop compared the speed at which participants identified colored squares with the naming of ink color a color-word was printed

Word meaning is processed involuntarily thereby slowing down colour naming as attention is divided. The Stroop effect was retested by using a list of semantically-related distractor words instead of colour words and a list of colour-neutral words. The one-tailed hypothesis is that reaction time between stimulus and response will be longer when colour-related words are in a colour that is incongruent with the word. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the reaction time for the two lists.

To understand the concept of Stroop effect, learning the definition is the first step in learning. To define the meaning, it is “a test for this effect in which individuals are presented with lists of color words in matching and non-matching colors and the time they take to read the different words, or the number of errors they make, is recorded.” (Stroop effect | definition of Stroop effect by Medical dictionary). With Stroop effect, we try to recognize and identify such colors and numbers. In the article, Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control, by Chris Blais , Michael B. Harris , Jennifer V. Guerrero and Silvia A. Bunge, the subjects' performance is fundamentally based on implicit, rather than explicit, knowledge of the

J. Ridley Stroop (1935) investigated the response of the brain through the Stroop Effect, and attention fails as two cognitive processes conflicting each other. Stroop (1935) asked students to read off lists in two types of conditions; the congruent condition (NC test), which consisted of solid colored squares and a condition with in-congruent word colored pairs (NCWd Test). For example, in the in-congruent condition the word “Green” would be printed in red ink. Stroop found that the students had a slower reaction rate in the NCWd Test than the NC test, due to the word interfering with the ability to focus on the colors (Green, n.d.). His results suggest that the ability to quickly perceive words can conflict with the processing of

We are replicating J.R. Stroop’s original experiment The Stroop Effect (Stroop, 1935). The aim of the study was to understand how automatic processing interferes with attempts to attend to sensory information. The independent variable of our experiment was the three conditions, the congruent words, the incongruent words, and the colored squares, and the dependent variable was the time that it took participants to state the ink color of the list of words in each condition. We used repeated measures for the experiment in order to avoid influence of extraneous variables. The participants were 16-17 years of age from Garland High School. The participants will be timed on how long it takes them to say the color of the squares and the color of the words. The research was conducted in the Math Studies class. The participants were aged 16-17 and were students at Garland High School. The results showed that participants took the most time with the incongruent words.