preview

Vermeer: A View Of Delft

Decent Essays

Vermeer’s life is mostly a mystery for historians. Most of what is known about his life is what can be pieced together using his paintings. Art historians use the paintings and the very little written records available to try and piece together Vermeer’s life. However, the task is difficult because of the lack of information and the guesswork involved with using paintings. Vermeer: A View of Delft is Anthony Baily’s attempt at reconstructing Vermeer’s life, using his art, the written records, and the town of Delft, Vermeer’s home. Anthony Baily does not make a convincing biography about Vermeer because of the lack of information about Vermeer’s life; instead, he creates a biography about Delft. Information available about Vermeer’s early …show more content…

Because of the lack of records, many possible painters have been proposed as his teacher. Carel Fabritius is thought to be the most likely candidate. Baily has to rely on other apprentices’ accounts of their studies with their masters such as Isaac Isaaczoon or Rembrandt, as a typical apprenticeship. The lack of information about where and who Vermeer apprenticed with results in having to conjecture about what he would have experienced. Baily uses information about other apprentices in order to give an idea about what Vermeer’s apprenticeship might have looked like. Baily has to rely on the typical apprenticeship in order to reconstruct what Vermeer’s possibly would have been like. After Vermeer’s marriage, another record is available. Records show that he was registered as a master painter in the Guild of St. Luke in 1653. He was charged the full entrance fee to the guild when he joined, which is strange because he was a resident of Delft and should have been charged half the cost. The reason for this unusual charge is not known, and Baily can only guess at why he may have been charged this price. He proposes that the reason Vermeer was charged this price was because he may have been sent away to study, possibly in Utrecht. However, none of this is actually known. Baily has to use this information about Delft and its guild in order to try to …show more content…

He married Catharina Bolnes on April 20, 1653. They owned a house on the Oude Langendijck. Baily uses an inventory in 1976 in order to attempt to reconstruct what the house would have looked like. He also uses other similar houses in Delft to provide additional information. His description only uses an inventory and example houses because the actual Vermeer house does not exist anymore and historians do not know what it looked like. There is no available description of the actual house, forcing him to fabricate what the house looked like using a source about Vermeer and a source from Delft. Using other Delft houses gives a view of what Delft looked like. While having the inventory of goods allows Baily to give a more personalized depiction of the house, he still has to rely mainly on Delft in order to give a reconstruction on what the house was like. He suggests that the Vermeer family most likely had a live-in female servant because it was typical of well-to do Delft households. Professor Montias believes that the subject of one of Vermeer’s paintings, The Milkmaid, could be Tanneke Everpoel, the serving woman of Catharina’s mother Maria Thins. The woman depicted in the painting is brawny and capable of fending off an unwanted suitor, like Tanneke did with Willem, Maria’s son. Maria Thins definitely employed Tanneke, evidenced by records. Tanneke was named creditor of Vermeer’s estate and was

Get Access