Veronica V. Jake's Negligence

Causation: Had the offender not hit the victim whilst he was walking across the driveway there is no chance he could have died. His death was a direct result of the offender’s actions, as the wounds sustained from the attack killed him shortly after an ambulance arrived on scene.

1) Since the injured plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt, why is Ford being sued for failing to test the seatbelt sleeve?

A) The topic concerning this case is negligence law. The issue is whether Simon would be successful perusing a negligence claim.

Donoghue's well-being. From this legal precedent, I would say that Elvis harmed his neighbour, Freddy, negligently, because he did closely and directly affect his well-being by not taking into account what might reasonably happen when he carelessly dropped some bricks. (B) This case relates to negligence (as defined above) and the principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur - the facts speak for themselves. In cases involving proven Res Ipsa Loquitur, the burden to show that the defendant was negligent (or whatever the tort may be) by the plaintiff shifts to the defendant, who must prove that there is another reasonable explanation for whatever misfortune befell the plaintiff.

Our client, Sage Rent-A-Car Incorporation, leased a vehicle to Jeffery Calkin. The Defendant, Mr. Calkin was involved in a collision by failing to stop at a stop sign, therefore colliding with Jane White, the Plaintiff. Ms. White filed a negligence law suit against Mr. Calkin and Sage Rent-A-Car Inc. In the complaint, the Plaintiff claims that our client is required to carry insurance under the provisions of the Mandatory Financial Responsibility Act and therefore, has the duty to assume liability for the Defendant’s negligent collision. This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff’s complaint.

This paper is about the Case of Jacob and his diseased leg. Clinical negligence is one the main causes that led to the infection of Jacobs’s leg. It later resulted in his life being altered due to the fact that it prolonged his healing process because of a mistake that his own physician had made. The key component of integrity and honesty wasn’t exercised in this situation because of the lack of maintaining high moral and ethical conducts when treating Jacob. Due to this negligence, the consequences will be affected by both parties in which will result in taking it to the next level by taking Dr. M to court. This case should be treated as a civil action law suit because a wrongful act was committed. The use of clinical protocols helps healthcare professionals establish appropriate treatments and care for the patients.

The Plaintiff, Keller, sued the defendant, DeLong. DeLong was driving Kellers car at Tyngsboro, Massachusetts at approximately 11:40p.m. on April 14, 1963, DeLong collided with a utility pole at the side of the highway. The Trial Court ruled that the sole cause of the accident was the fact that the defendant dozed off to sleep and did not awaken in time to avoid collision with the pole. The driver showed no sign he was going to fall asleep. Defendant, Carl DeLong, suddenly and unexpectedly dozed at the time of the occurrence of the accident. Defendant, DeLong, was not found negligent. Vacated; reversed, affirming trial court’s judgment.

One would think that as a business person you should be allowed to distribute flyers as advertisements to people, and possible customers or consumers on the streets. Well, in April of 1942 a business man in Florida found himself facing charges for advertising his business using paper flyers. The Supreme Court did not consider whether or not commercial speech deserved First Amendment protection unit the Valentine v. Chrestensen case.(pg. 229) In Valentine v. Chrestensen, “The respondent, a citizen of Florida, owns a former United States Navy submarine which he exhibits for profit. In 1940 he brought it to New York City and moored it at a State pier in the East River. He prepared and printed a handbill advertising the boat and soliciting visitors

Plaintiff further asserts that the Defendant breached its duty of care to her by: (1) “failing to fix a hazardous condition within a reasonable time;” (2) “failing to adequately warn plaintiff of a hazardous condition;” and (3) “otherwise failing to exercise reasonable and due care under the circumstances.” The Plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars, plus interest and costs.

Running late for work is not something that can be fixed over night, and neither is stopping distracted driving, but education about the damages of distracted driving is something that is crucial to bringing awareness to this problem. Personal injury lawyers have the change to play a significant role in this education because of the knowledge and experience they have with these issues. My case is minor to many that require representation. Another thing that is necessary is personal responsibility. Since I know the consequences of distracted driving, I am now responsible for my actions while driving. I am also responsible for sharing my experience with others to educate them about their responsibilities as a driver and about the consequences of distracted driving and the importance of driving

The negligence claims against the Radio Station disc jockey. The disc Jockey was liable for misfeasance owed a duty of care toward the young listener in the contest, breached that duty of care by disregarding youthfulness carelessness by the driving unsafe on the Highway to meet in one location just to win a prize which cause the younger driver that performing a legal act, and the resulted in harm cause automobile accident that cause the young listeners

Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). The standard measure of negligence is the universal reasonable person standard. The assumption in this case is that a reasonable

(Creditability) I have seen too many families that have been affected by accidents from distracted drivers. This includes my own, five years ago my niece’s car was rear end by a teen that was texting while driving.

This is an example of faulty cause because we shouldn’t assume that because one thing follows another is cause by the other. She could have that car accident because her driving skill was poor.

Negligence is defined as the inability to demonstrate responsible behavior. Drivers are required to have a duty of reasonable care which means that they have to ensure they avoid actions that could possibly harm another party. If they fail to do so, they are said to be negligent.