Vice Presidential Debate Over Tim Kaine

The Republicans and Democrats would have you believe that America is perfect besides the other party. There's no doubt that there are some serious issues with the politics of this country, but one of my significant concerns isn’t the feud between the conservatives and the liberals, it's the Electoral College. In my opinion, the reason that politics is so utterly bungled is the inherent issues that stem from the election process. The Electoral College devalues votes and the voices of the individuals so in my opinion, removing it should be a bipartisan issue.

But the race turned again before the end of September, when Bush went on two popular daytime television shows and Gore was hit by the media and his GOP opponents for exaggerating and embellishing stories and anecdotes. Suddenly, Gore was again on the defensive over the issue of character. The polls turned toward Bush, who received a surprising boost from the first presidential debate and then for Dick Cheney's performance in the lone debate between the vice presidential candidates. Bush did even better in the second presidential debate, and while most political insiders thought Gore did better in the third debate, television viewers split between Bush and Gore when asked to pick the winner. So, as Election Day nears, the roller-coaster presidential race looked much as it once did -- headed for a close contest and an uncertain outcome.

A Bush vs. Gore election, a completely unfair and illegitimate political race. Fighting for the final battle in Florida, winner claim to be the next president of the United States. With Bush’s brother to be the governor, every news station and political of Florida Palm Beach County, in Florida, home to many older and possibly more senile people. When voting for the next President, many people have believed to have incorrectly voted and claimed to have voted for someone they didn’t choose to. Gore lost the machine count, however many people were demanding a re-vote since they feel as if their votes were not properly filled out and/ or counted for the wrong candidate. Bush was leading by 15,000, however there was multiple mix ups with the numbers

The first topic was about economic issues and vice president 's views about our economy. The reporter has asked the first question about their explanation of a fact that non-partisan committees said neither of their economic plans will reduce the national debt. Pence started by stating that he has done an excellent job as a governor with balanced budget. Republicans plan is to cut taxes and improve the education. They believe cutting taxes will help US economy to move again. Also, he has stated the willingness of repealing Obama Care since it does not work as it is right now. According to Pence, when they will get the economy growing, only after they can deal with the national debt. Kiane brought the 5 components plan that they are planning to make. It consists of investing in manufacturing, investing in work force, making colleges debt free, promoting fairness, promoting small business growth, and raising taxes. In my opinion, democrats already have a clear plan, on the

What do I think? After reading NPRs fact check of the third presidential debate I maintain a different mindset than when I first endured the debate of our two presidential candidates. Although seeing the debate on tv might cause some voters to sway towards one candidate rather than the other it is apparent to me now that we are not always getting the full story. I am not as thoroughly educated as some of my peers or voters I do have an opinion on who I would vote for if I could and if I hadn't read this article my decision would have been made under false pretenses under the debate itself not the tangible evidence. This is a well known problem for americans voting without true understanding for the issues or for the suggested solutions, I didn't

I watched the third presidential debate on Wednesday, October 19, at 8 pm. Chris Wallace moderated the debate between the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump. The purpose of the debate was to allow for both candidates to be compared side by side in order to determine who would be a better candidate to become the president of the United States.

Throughout the debate, I had a difficult time following a lot of what was said. However, from what I was able to hear and decipher, I agree with Governor Mike Pence. In the economy portion I feel like Pence’s standpoint is better. His plan is to lower taxes, invest in the small business, and keep coal plants running. All of these things would better America. Raising minimum wage would raise everything else. Everything would cost more with the raise in minimum wage and that is what Senator Kaine wants. Also, he wants to raise taxes on the rich and I believe that this would indirectly affect the middle-class. I liked what Pence said about the law enforcement, he said that police are the best of us which I fully support. I also liked how he said that every police involved shooting should be investigated fully and completely. Kaine said

This debate between Kaine and Pence was interesting because of many reasons. Originally, I thought Kaine would win this debate because in the presidential debate, I believe Hillary won against Trump. Kaine uses a good technique against Pence by focusing on certain issues rather than a variety of issues. An example would be describing how bad Trump is. Pence is a strong person because he was able to keep his emotions under control even when he was being criticized heavily by Kaine. Regarding Trump’s tax returns questions, I believe that Pence’s response did not answer the question completely. I believe that Pence should have better prepared himself because I am guessing he knew that Trump’s tax returns would have been included in the debate.

After having fully watched the three hour long GOP Debates I have formed several opinions of my own regarding what was said by the candidates. Firstly I would just like to say that I started watching with the notion that Donald Trump was the worst political candidate, which I still believe is true. However I would prefer him in a very narrow margin above Carly Fiorina. Because she could very well, if elected as president could in one move, restart the Cold War. Anyone who underwent US history or lived through it wouldn't want a terrifying period like that to start again. This brings me to who did the best, someone I hadn't heard of before was, John Kasich. Since not only did he mention talking to Russia instead of threatening them, but

While both candidates did usually diverge a bit from the question, Donald Trump did so much more. Trump could only answer the questions about the Supreme Court directly. Everything else he would somehow relate back the either Hillary Clinton’s emails or to Bill Clinton. He also may times repeated the same fact for questions even if it was only vaguely related to the actual questions. Near the end of debate, Trump was asked if he would accept the outcome of the election.

CNN wanted this second Republican primary debate to look like a 3-hour WWE wrestling match. The motive was obvious. The first debate host by FOX News had blows between Donald Trump and Senator Rand Paul, and Paul against Governor Chris Christie. A month later, CNN are the hosts, airing commercials letting the audience know they wanted all the Republican candidates to fight with each other in a no holds bar match. The debate rules from CNN were “simple”- candidates were asked a question and if that candidate criticizes another candidate in the answer, the candidate invoked would have the chance to respond back to the criticism. And our friends at CNN intended to make sure the candidates would attack each by the questions they were given.

On September 26, the first presidential debate of the 2016 election was held between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump. The debate was divided into six segments approximately fifteen minutes long, each beginning with a question chosen by the moderator, Lester Holt of NBC Nightly News. The topic of “Achieving Prosperity” opened the debate, focusing of jobs and taxes. “America’s Direction” was the subject of the next two segments, which consisted primarily of questions based on the racial divide in America. The final matter of the night was “Securing America”. This topic brought attention to cyber and “homegrown” attacks and the nation’s current policy on the use of nuclear weapons.

What did you learn from the vice presidential debate that was different from the presidential debate?

Looking at the viewer rating of presidential debates in the election seasons can prove just how much people are interested in these debates. Voters have good reason to do so because debating can show many qualities of a person. These qualities become very important when it comes to presidential candidates because debates can show one’s thoughts about policies, the ability to carry them out, and ability to settle negotiations.

Presidential debates were designed as a medium for voters to determine the suitability of potential presidential candidates. Finding topics for these debates is an intense study performed by analysts who survey, along with big data information to determine which topics will pull the greatest emotion, fire up the most drama, and most of the time fail to product any viable solution regardless of what those topics are.