preview

Victims Of Torture: A Case Study

Decent Essays

The Center for Victims of Torture does great, admirable work. The groups purpose is to heal and rehabilitate, with a mission statement to “rebuild the lives and restores the hope of people who survive torture and war atrocities”. The group helps hundreds upon hundreds of families every single year and their goal is to keep this number exponentially rising. They have felled no scandal nor any less than savory business practices. That had me wondering though, seeing as this group is so genuinely impressive, how come I’d never heard of them up until this assignment? Then it struck me, the CVT has a branding problem. One I believe sprouts from the name itself. Victims as a term feels fairly played out by this point. Not only does it seem played out it also seems downright patronizing. The term victim trivializes the pain, suffering, and trauma that these people, these so-called victims, have persevered through. Instead of empowering them calling these people victims neuters them. This is because once someone is a victim it’s very hard not to be a victim. The word inks itself into ones’ skin, acting as a permanent reminder of their status as other. As different. As not normal. Branding the people that this organization strives to help as victims doesn’t fall in line …show more content…

The words can definitely be viewed as two sides of the same coin. After all it is hard to find a survivor who wasn’t at some point a victim. The difference however is in the connotations that both words carry. The word “victim” carries with it a sense of helplessness, a need to be rescued or saved. While the word survivor evokes a sense of power with it. A survivor by (admittedly loose) definition is someone who fought and had to overcome. Someone who went through trauma and came out the other side. Truly this is everyone that the CVT is trying to help. The group has no victims, only

Get Access