Victor And Frankenstein Comparison Essay

Several fields have studied the relationship between creator and creation. The most significant aspect of this research considers the difference between nature and nurture. Sociologists, psychologists, scientists, and other professionals have tried to pin down the exact distinctions between these two types of upbringings. In literature, the same questions have been asked and studied using fictional characters, most famously in John Milton’s Paradise Lost, in 1667, and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, in 1818. The complexity of the characters in these texts creates the theme of nature versus nurture before they diverge and arrive at differing conclusions.

The contrast and comparison between, Victor and the monster affects the plot, the theme and the character motivation is also affected. The two characters of the book Frankenstein are Victor and the later introduced monster. These two character come from a very different plot each but this small change in the plot affects the story in a big way. Their specific theme of the book also matters in the story in a way that impacts the reader's emotion itself. Lastly the character motivations play a key role in making the characters' do certain things that they may not fully want to have done.

With Halloween being right around the corner, children are preparing for ABC’s “Thirteen Nights of Halloween,” parents are picking up pumpkins to celebrate the Celtic holiday, and the urge for a good horror story is emerging. The monster, such as vampires or zombies, is taking the spotlight and it’s hard to ignore. From Dante’s Inferno to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, being frightened has not only been one of people’s favorite pastimes, but a way for us to explain the paranormal and unrevealed. In recent times however, there seems to be a shift from demonic creatures of the night to over sexualized human-like creatures who hide amongst us in the day. In this essay, I will show the gradual humanizing of the vampire and how it has morphed from a demonic creature damned by God into a creature with a big heart that is not much different from us.

In “Insurmountable barriers to our union’: Homosocial male bonding, homosexual panic, and death on the ice in Frankenstein” James Holt McGavran makes a compelling argument about the nature of Frankenstein’s creature in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein.” He argues that the creature represents his creators repressed sexuality and that Victor’s rejection of the creature stems from “homosexual panic.” The revulsion Victor feels is due to being faced with a physical manifestation of his sexuality and being forced to confront it. McGavran claims that the mutual obsession with one another that the creature and Victor share is due to attraction, and that the creature represents an ideal lover for Victor. He goes on to offer proof of both Shelley’s

In Shelly’s novel Frankenstein’s monster in often compared to Adam from Milton’s epic work. In fact, the monster himself tells Victor Frankenstein that he sees himself as being very similar to Adam. Like Adam, the monster was, in a sense, perfect at his

     The challenges of race, class, and cultural privileges are frequently questioned, and how a person is perceived by society often is decided upon by these aspects. Although it is an everyday occurrence that a person is judged by what color their skin is or how much money their family has, it is a topic that most feel too uncomfortable to examine. However, Mary Shelley had the courage to verbalize the pain and suffering that results from oppression and judgment. She lets the reader delve into the mind of the subjugated, and in doing so she allows them to challenge the traditional ideas of cultural privilege, race, and class. It is proven that looks determine the way a person is perceived by the contrasting

In the novel Frankenstein, Victor and the Monster had the same correlation throughout the entire book. They were always dealing with the same situations. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, with Victor and the Monster. From nature, family, and living in desolation, they shared an abundance in common.

Frankenstein’s creature is a testament to this theory as his education and growth follow several divergent paths throughout his short existence, resulting at the last in the freedom of the creature through the death of his creator. Strangely, although the secular theme is continued throughout the text, the religious references and biblical allusions cannot be ignored and are a complex addition to a text that would otherwise be viewed as a secular treatise on the dangerous nature of knowledge. Although it would be simple to pare the text down to such non-religious terms, it cannot be ignored that Frankenstein contains a great deal of biblical symbolism, particularly the theme of the outcast and the story of creation. One difference, though, makes the monster a sympathetic character,

Victor Frankenstein envisions his creature as the epitome of human wisdom and ability, overlooking the possible moral consequences, comparable to the optimistic conception of in vitro meat production. Although considering to form his creation as "a being like [himself], or

In “Frankenstein” otherwise known as the “The Modern Prometheus,” the author Mary Shelley unfolds a gothic tale that at the surface is a cautionary horror on the sin of creating a visual monster but upon close inspection unfolds a framed buildingroman that encapsulates how society can shape one self through the eyes of a growing creature (1). At a fundamental part of creatures growth, chapters eleven through fifteen, the creature encounters the De Lacey family where he learns and grows to understand human emotions through each of the family members and through their interactions with each other. Shelley utilizes key notions of societal understandings of family relationships to demonstrate how the creature, like a child, yearns to be apart and learn from those around them. The yearning to be apart of society becomes a fundamental part in how the mind of the creature is dependent on the acceptance of society around him, but through the visual depiction of the creator himself, this ultimately creates a turning point in how he is the monster. The family in essence represents a rapid structure of the bildungsroman for the creature as each of the members and actions of the family represent a growing stage in the creature’s life that outside of his relationship with Victor Frankenstein becomes apart of his upbringing.

The two find themselves to be lonely. Sadly because of isolation it brought out their desires for vengeance. Victor Frankenstein, though having a family and college professors, does not seem to have any close friends. Instead of socializing with those living on the college campus, Victor devotes his time and energy to establishing his creation. In comparison to Victor, the creature’s loneliness seems to be far more extreme and quite sad. The creature has absolutely no one. Instead of respect, the Monster’s loving affections are always met with disdain, disgust, despise, scorn and slight. Victor has been accustomed to love and mutual respect nearly all of life. This is not the same for Frankenstein, who has never really experiences friendship

From the beginning of time to the present, nature is always portraying as a broad element of life that is rarely in everyday language. As a genius writer like Mary Shelley, she writes a frame story called Frankenstein that illustrates the natures of Victor Frankenstein and the creature. Although it’s a story that revolves around nature but it contains a strong view that Victor Frankenstein as the creator is less human then his creation. With the very first sight of his creation, Victor already named it frightful and unpleasing to see. As frighten as Victor can be he abandoned his creation or the creature to an unknown world.

From his biased description of his creature’s conception, Victor Frankenstein clarifies his abhorrence for the creature’s physical features, which necessarily prevents a development

Mary Shelley writing this novel when she was only eighteen years of age in 1817, it is a classic and iconic novel of where she greatly displays the theme of human motives. Both Victor Frankenstein and the monster are the same and also different in some ways. She displays how there is good and evil in both human and nonhuman beings and makes connections to real life, by showing the highs and lows of Victor and the monster.

In most people’s minds as of today, there is no question to who the monster is in Mary Shelley’s book, Frankenstein. It is the creature that Viktor Frankenstein created, that murders innocent people. However, when looking beyond the appearance of the creature, it is evident that he did not begin as a monster. Mary Shelley analyzes fundamental and crucial issues in her novel in terms of being able to use science and knowledge for the good of people and not for the satisfaction of personal ambitions without even being able to take responsibility for that. It is also the novel of social rejection based on external looks and inability to accept. It was the extreme misconceptions of humans that resulted in the extreme isolation of Frankenstein’s