Video Self Modeling As A Fluency Recovery Strategy For Adults

When it comes to conversing, there are a few folks who have a disorder causing an individual to falter at the point of vocalization. The habitual activities that most perform per diem are an added challenge for these folks, no matter the task at hand. This could be showing gratitude, responding to a straightforward inquiry, or stating their own name. The normal falterer being noticeable for conversing complications. We are so lost in the virtue of the "normal" that it is simple to slip one's mind. For most, the normal does not present itself until a problem comes up. As for the faltering, this is the result of conversing. Faltering exposes an essential separation in terminology and vocalization. Various features go into vocalizing but we are generally blind to these features including the normalness of vocalization. Those who falter, are very aware of

Hoagland begins his essay with an analogy to help the audience understand his stutter in a clear and visual way. He likens his handicap to “trying to run with loops of rope around your feet” (Hoagland

After 60 years of stuttering, Hoagland reminisces about his struggles and triumphs to overcome his stuttering. While attending school, he learned that, “Life can become a matter of measuring the importance of anything you have to say.” He felt that it was

The main purpose of this article is to examine various research on the etiology of stuttering. The experimental research explored various brain circuitries involved, specifically the the basal ganglia. Furthermore, the meta-analysis discussed neuroimaging, lesion, pharmacological, and genetic studies on the neural circuitries connected to persistent developmental stuttering and acquired neurogenic stuttering.

I entered the field with an interest in fluency and participated in the National Stuttering Association in Queens, New York. The stutter started in my teens and faded away in my early adulthood.  I researched speech language pathology and came upon all the different aspects of this field since the definition of speech pathology is broad. I knew I wanted to specialize in stuttering when I was a teenager. This changed when I was in the Communication Sciences and Disorders program in my undergrad. This program exposed me to different classes and observations of communication disorders in a variety of age ranges. This exposed me to adult population as well in which I gained an interest because of their lack of tantrums and willingness to gain back

One person, a young teen guy, even mocked me. I tried not to let it go too deeply under my skin. I had to keep reminding myself that this was just temporary, just for the assignment. I definitely can’t imagine what those who have or have had a stutter for the majority of their lives go through. Just one short experience of having to stutter made me feel so small. I can’t even begin to fathom how people with an actual stutter feel about themselves, especially when people treat them so cruelly for something that they can’t help. Overall, stuttering made me feel slower and more self-conscious. I felt like I was being judged solely on the stutter and nothing else. I felt as though all the eyes in the food court were on me, even though they weren’t. I felt slower in the sense that it took me longer to say what I wanted and for some reason, I had to deliberate more as to how I would say what I wanted to. When we watched the kids stuttering during the lecture last week and describing how they felt, I could sympathize with them. After having to experience stuttering first hand, I would definitely say that I developed empathy for them and anyone else with a

Barry Yeoman in “Wrestling Words”, expresses the struggles of how stuttering becomes a setback in life. Stuttering may seem like an easy disability to overcome,but for those who struggle know the true devastating pain. Not being able to fit the cookie cutter perfect imagine of society not just physically,but also emotionally impacts stutters. Stuttering seems incurable,but organizations like the National Stuttering Project believe an end is reachable. Stuttering is not a life threatening disease,but a setback to thrive on.

This documentary focuses on the journey of seven different individuals who are considered people who stutter. I believe it is important to note the statistics of the prevalence of stuttering mentioned in the video. The statistic states that 1 out of 100 adult and 5 out of 100 children are people who stutter. This prevalence is important for speech therapists to become informed and equipped to treat this population. This documentary gives great insight on the struggles and successes of this population.

The Stuttering Foundation provides a free online resources, services and supports those who stutter and their family members along as the support of the research. This foundation is proudly a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and classified as a private operating foundation, defined in section 4942(j)(3). The first and largest nonprofit charitable organization in the world, that reach to over a million people annually to improve the treatment of stuttering. The stuttering foundation also offer extensive training programs for any professional in this

the Modifying Phonation Intervals (MPI) Stuttering Treatment Program With Adults Who Stutter. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), 256-271.

In this blog, she discusses topics such as authenticity and vulnerability. She defines messy versus clean stuttering and the different emotions associated with each. She speaks about how accepting her stutter affects not only her feelings of personal identity and belonging but also her students’ feelings of respect and acceptance towards her. Furthermore, she touches on different issues like small communities, covertness, and separate classrooms which create an isolated feeling for those who stutter and prevent community building. She builds off of her own experiences as a

The Johnson’s Speech Therapy Experiment was conducted by Dr. Wendell Johnson, whose purpose was to prove preexisting theories about stuttering wrong. During the time, people commonly believed that genetics was to blame for stuttering and nothing could be done about it. However, Dr. Johnson hypothesized that children become more worse once they are labeled as a stutterer. To conduct the experiment, twenty-two children were forcefully chosen to participate without even being informed about what the study was about. From the twenty-two participants, half of them were placed into a positive therapy group while the other half were placed into a negative therapy group. Children in the positive therapy group were complimented and cheered on for their

In 1939 an experiment now known as the “Monster Study” was conducted on 22 orphaned children by Wendell Johnson, a very influential speech pathologist at the University of Iowa. In this experiment the orphaned children were divided up into two separate groups. One group was given positive speech therapy, in which they were praised for their fluency. The other group was given negative speech therapy. They were belittled for every speech imperfection and told that they were stutterers. Many of the normal speaking children who were subjected to the negative speech therapy experienced negative psychological effects and some developed lasting speech impediments.

Although there is empirical support for the use of video self-modeling (VSM) as a fluency maintence and recovery tool for children, the effectiveness of VSM as a maintence tool in the treatment of adults has yet to be established. This study evaluated the effectiveness of (VSM) as a recovery tool for adults experiencing a decline after successfully completing a stuttering treatment program. It also explored participants’ viewing practices and perceptions of the use of VSM. Three adult males who recently completed the Comprehension Stuttering Program (CSP) and were unhappy with their level of fluency prior to the study, were the chosen participants. The participants viewed VSM recordings twice a week, for 6 weeks and a final interview was conducted

The following is a summary of a journal article titled, “Is Parent -Child Interaction Therapy Effective in Reducing Stuttering?” by Sharon Millard, Alison Nicholas, and Frances Cook. This article was published in the Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research in June 2008, to report the findings of a research conducted on the effects of parent-child interaction therapy approach (PCIT) on children who stutter. It was conducted to add more research and evidence to the efficacy of using the PCIT approach (Millard, Nicholas, & Cook, 2008 p 636).