Violation Of Dress Code At Work

Dress codes change generally among districts and fields of occupation in America. A Wall Street representative will wear a smart suit and shirt to work, while start-up workers in Silicon Valley may appear in shorts and shirt amid available time. Be possibly overdressed rather than underdressed for your imminent representative meeting, a fundamental meeting, or your first day at work. When you pick among moderate, sharp nice, and nice clothing, constantly go for one of the underlying two decisions, dependent upon how standard the association being alluded to is. If your commitments incorporate individual contact with customers or clients, more formal apparel is consistently anticipated. When you know the environment better, you may dress down,

Tattoos have been around for quite some time now, and they have always been a symbol of belonging, cultural expression or for religion. These days, individuals choose to tattoo themselves because it is part of their lifestyle or personal image. While continuing to grow in popularity and becoming a lifestyle, people are facing issues with having visible tattoos in the workforce. Although it is a form of free expression, employers have a right to enforce certain rules about tattoos in their company because they have a public image to uphold. How you present yourself to the public is solely important, which is why tattoos should not be allowed to be seen in the workplace, since it may appear offensive or unconservative.

Under Title VII, I would say this company is violating the law. It is stated in the textbook that under Title VII, “employers are required to reasonably accommodate religion, unless doing so would impose undue hardship.” (Walsh, Pg. 358). By having the employee respect her sacred religion and wearing her hijab, would not cause the company any costly, extensive, or detrimental accommodations.

In Jon Kelly’s article he brings more information on the stance taken against tattoos in the work place by potential employers. Kelly discusses how employers tend to discriminate

Discrimination from people have a tattoo are completed accepted and sometimes are not. Because of their what looks like or act, but anyways employers have options, on what they want to do for their care. That’s why some enthusiast for painting, their skin is bad for some employers to look of them with tattoos. For example, they have recognized that it’s no bad thing if their staff mirror the appearance of their customers.

One of the challenges I face in this school is the dress code. I believe the dress code is ridiculous, unnecessary, and not fair. One of the ways the dress code is not fair is the only dress code girls that are mainly in the 7th grade, and the boys could come to school with tank tops and shorts, and no one would care. As soon as a girl wears a shirt that has a 2 inch wide strap, all of the principles overreact, because it is “distracting.” Instead of dress coding the girls, they should educate these young boys on how to behave, and how to properly treat girls.

One of the challenges I face in this school is the dress code. I think the dress code is ridiculous, unnecessary, and not fair. One of the ways dress code is not fair is the only dress code girls that are mainly in the 7th grade, and the boys could come to school with tank tops and shorts, and no one would care. As soon as a girl wears a shirt that has a 2 inch wide strap, all of the principles overreact, because it is “distracting.” Instead of dress coding the girls, they should educate these young boys on how to behave, and how to properly treat girls.

While tattoos have become more and more acceptable over the years, the question still lies on whether tattoos or any other kind of body modifications in the workplace should be allowed. It's beyond easy to make cases showing the negative impacts of discrimination against tattoos and piercings in the workplace. Plastic surgery, drawing on your eyebrows, getting fake nails, and coloring your hair are also examples of body modifications. Though not everyone agrees with or thinks they’re beautiful, employees are not told to cover up these modifications. Tattoos and piercings are purely another form of beautification and what makes each person their own unique individual. Beauty is personal.

Three-fourths of businesses require employees to have no visible tattoos or piercings. A majority of companies agree that tattoos and piercings detract from a personal appearance and are irrevocable. In a recent article on Fox News a Starbucks’ employee faces firing for a small tattoo on the hand. Kayla told Fox News her managers informed her she has thirty days to begin a removal process or she would lose her job. Discrimination of professionals is very typical.

Does anti-discrimination laws pertain to those with body modifications? If an employer does not have the right to deny employment to someone due to their race, religion, and gender, then why should it be OK to turn someone away just because of a small tattoo. The knowledge and potential of the employee do not cease to exist due to their self-expression through their body art. A lot of potentially good employees have been turned away because of body modifications: big or small.

Should you have to have a dress code for your place of work. Many occupations require the employees to work in dress code. I agree that employees should have a dress code. Dress codes within the work place is very important because the employees will look professional, all look as one working body in the work place and to have a safer work place.

Everyone once in their life has come across a poorly dressed employee. They look very unprofessional, like they are not skilled. Clothing needed for an employee’s protection is important. Keeping the workplace a safe and equal community is essential for any business. Furthermore setting a dress code should be required for employees.

Recently, whilst researching about this topic, I came across an article about this unfortunate young girl, Amii, a 20 year old female from England. Amii had applied for the job of a waitress, and her interview was half phone call, half face to face. During the telephone interview the employer had mentioned what the uniform was, Amii had to inform the employer of her inked arms as the uniform had short sleeves which exposed her body art. When the employer heard this he hung up. Amii went on to get the job as a shop assistant in a mobile phone shop and whilst trying to help a customer who had issues with her mobile, the customer was shouting and demanding a refund which wasn’t possible. Suddenly, the customer started making nasty remarks regarding Amii’s ink, and yelled “You’re disgusting” and told her she had let the company down. Amii was clearly upset by this and had to leave to cry. Even though her tattoos weren’t inappropriate, this customer found them unsuitable. This is just one of the many examples of tattoos being discriminated in the workplace.

There are many employers that have the opinion that having visible tattoos is unacceptable for the professional work environment. Someone with a tattoo is seen as uneducated and possible dangerous. However, there is no solid evidence to support either of those beliefs. The stigma of sporting a visible tattoo has no validity. A person with tattoos is just as knowledgeable and capable of working as a non-tattooed person. Tattoos, whether visible or covered, do not change a person’s individual work ethic or how educated they are.

Team, the Character Count's room has been set up now for ISS. We now have a plan in place for the students that are in dress code violation. In an effort to stop the inappropriate conversations between students that are in violation while sitting at the table near the search area we are revamping the sitting areas of student during morning search.