Violence And Nonviolence Research Paper

However, a peaceful protest can easily turn into violence, as you can’t control the actions of everyone involved. People with different agendas embed and hide within groups that are trying to achieve to the greater good for people. Although people with different agendas end up resorting to violent, that should not prevent the idea of civil disobedience to be just. Rather those individuals that causes violent are violating the law should be punished. This creates a problem for those that meant good, because they end up being victims and being arrested. Like in the case of Martin Luther

All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.

So, while peaceful protest is allowed, and even encouraged sometimes, violence and chaos is never welcomed. For example, one of the most recent protests was on the day of the Inauguration of Donald Trump. Most of the protesters were peaceful and cooperative, some people even say not to judge these pretests based on one burning car, but we have to! For the safety of everybody around, better be too careful than not careful at all. This point is civil disobedience at its worst. All that this violence does is cause a state of chaos and confusion, where then communities are vulnerable, and vandalizing and looting take place. The night of Donald Trump's election, when there was also protests, people were seen burning the United States flag, which is a crime, but not this night when there was already turmoil everywhere you looked. This is how "peaceful" protests can negatively affect a society, because there is not order and only

Peaceful resistance in today's society is counted as just as bad as violent riots. As Americans with our constitutional rights should have the ability to peacefully resist anything that we find unjust but within current events it is seen as being a criminal for showing your opinion. I believe that peaceful resistance should have a positive impact on our country and that it should be seen as powerful rather than as weakness caused by the displeasure of events. As a country it is our job to take into consideration the rights and beliefs of all rather than few. For example within my own community there was a peaceful resistance or peaceful protest at our local university in which around 70 to 100 people were arrested simply for showing their

One example of non violence is The March on The Pentagon. The March on The Pentagon occured on October 21st, 1967. The March on The Pentagon was when 50,000 surrounded the Pentagon and protested the U.S military action in Vietnam, (Birth of Flower Power 1). This is a strong example of non-violence because the protesters surrounded the pentagon not with weapons but with flowers, these people faced guns pointed out and held flowers to peacefully protest. This shows that civil disobedience can have less bloodshed and loss than if they stormed the Pentagon with weapons, which would have got them all killed but just staying there and peacefully protesting saved all their lives and was equally affective rather the violence, for example Martin Luther King led his March on Washington a peaceful protest which led to the Civil rights laws being passed with no

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. America itself was built on the concept of adapting to meet the changing needs of society; its government outline was created so that the people could change laws when they needed to be changed, although the process is slow so as to avoid laws that are poorly thought out or do not represent the views of most American citizens. At several points in American history, there are times where only a few groups were fairly represented in government, and therefore, the needs of all the people were not represented accurately and we could not get the change we needed to happen. This is where civil disobedience comes into play - by peacefully and respectfully disobeying unjust laws that oppress American citizens, we get the attention of government officials who can do something to change the laws and right the wrongs that have been committed. Some well-known examples of this are the Women’s Suffrage movement and the Civil Right movement, as well as some recent examples, such as the Standing Rock protesters. By using peaceful protesting, we draw attention to injustices and garner the support and strength to say “no more”.

Social protest happen on an almost daily basis. Many of these social protest go unnoticed because they do not make the news. Some would argue that is why violence is needed when protesting. Violence may make the headlines but it will never make positive strides to reach the goals one hope to reach by protesting. Violence should not be an option when it comes to protesting.

Taking a look at history, there are many events that have been recorded that involve some type of protest. It usually seems that those who exercise their right to peacefully protest have had a greater impact than those who protest in violent and uncivil manner. Protests that evolve into riots and ensue police brutality have no positive impact on society, rather they cause damage and a strong controversy between people and society and the government. For example: the riot that exploded in ferguson Missouri when Michael Brown was shot. The only thing that resulted from a protest such as that

Protests throughout history have sparked controversy in both their subject matter and execution, calling into question the true value they impart. Peaceful resistance is a key element in the development of a free society as it facilitates a wide breadth of actions from the raising of awareness and the greater dissemination of ideas all the way to active change in laws and government.

Many people want to use violence to get their point across and hoping that it would solve their problems. Those who use non-violence hope that with time, the problem would be solved. The future of protest with the use of violence will cause more chaos rather good. That path is the path that should be avoided. The future of non-violent protest has more results than

Whether peaceful protests are just or not is not the most important aspect of them, they cause citizens to question their belief in laws, which is how a society evolves. As Charles Frankel reminds readers in his article “Is it Right to Break the Law?” citizens need to take responsibility for their choices and their hand in making laws. Peaceful protest help to make others aware of their hand in the subjugation or empowerment of others. Aware citizens are necessary for free society, without them, citizens blindly following delivers the government back into the hands of the

First, in years past and in the year of 2016, riots have been a major distinction throughout the history of existence in America. Because of these riots, resistance has promoted a negative impact in America. Knowing that we American's live in a free society, riots are assumed in time of depression and opinion, but at the same time, riots don't make the situation any better. In the Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. talks a little bit about riots and how they have effected the world. More or less the situation that he is in. Riots didn't help him in his situation, and they will never help our society now. To add on, riots are in no such way peaceful resistance towards laws. It takes away from the idea of a safe community and it scares a lot of people into thinking that America is falling away from the idea of peace. In the article Civil Disobedience: A Threat to Our Society, it states topics that many consider

In this day and age, change is vital. In order to see change, we must stand up for what we believe in. By speaking out against laws we believe to be unjust, we can make a difference. As long as we act with peace and respect, it is possible to change the law if your reasoning is sensible. Due to this, I wholeheartedly believe that peaceful resistance to laws has an overall positive impact on a free society. I came to this realization during my attendance at a local “Speak Up, Speak Out” rally in which our main goal was to protest against racism, police brutality, and to essentially speak up for those being oppressed by our society. Due to the resurgence of racial inequalities in America, police brutality has been a major issue this year in politics.

First, this peaceful resistance is healthy for our communities because it allows for altering unjust laws. Many issues that require nonviolent protests are forgotten or ignored matters. According to Martin Luther King Jr., the government’s indifference towards those problems forces people to “dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored” (Luther). Thus, peaceful protesters mean to create tension in the community that propels others into listening to their message. This attention for to the given matter, if strong enough, ultimately leads to an amendment in the constitution. Altogether, civil disobedience is appropriate because it purges our government of unconstitutional

Many people act differently to certain situations. Violence is usually used to express feelings. Violence should not be the only way to solve things. It’s not only dangerous but unnecessary also. Not all circumstances are violent though. Civil disobedience is a nonviolent way to expression your opinion towards something. People practice civil disobedience all the time. A friendly protest is a good example of civil disobedience. The Salt March, led by Mohandas Gandhi in 1930, was one of the first acts of civil disobedience in the 20th century. Violence was not the motive of the protest at all. The protest was for Indian independence from Britain. The people were tired of Britain’s reign of terror. No one could predict the affect it would have on the country in the near future. The non-violent protest served many purposes and got the message across.