Violence In John J. Collins's Does The Bible Justify Violence?

If a young child is exposed to violence in their early stages of growth it will have a lasting impression on them. "The younger the child, the more harmful the impact may be. Young children are at high risk due to their immature ability to understand," (Futures without Violence 1). However, according to The National Institute of Mental Health, the brain is less influenced by ideas, like violence and foul language, by the age of 15 because the ideas have already been shown to them through excessive exposure to these topics in television, video games, and current events. Children have been desensitized of the permanent aspect of death, but the older the child the more violence has been shown as something to be afraid of. High schoolers in advanced placement classes have already uncovered the violence in modern society. Therefore, the violence in In Cold Blood should not have a long lasting effect on these students if the issues are discussed in a secure

Many youngsters ,teens and simply people become more inspirited after watching fictional violence ,which teaches them to act courageously and be high-spirited .It became no wonder for the new generation to possess such discs with violence at all their dwellings .Attracted by their heroes ,humans

From infancy onward, parents and teachers have drilled into the young generation that violence should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and “using one’s words” as tactics to combat difficult situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims there is an alternative way. In his essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Jones argues that “creative violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives children a tool to master their rage” (Jones). In other words, media violence, used correctly, can serve as an alternative method for powering through adolescence. By reading and writing violent stories, children are able to express

Many parents seek to have children’s literature which contains violence removed or banned from all access to young children. They complain that the subject matter of these books is too much for children to handle. The parents do this as they believe it to be a form of protection from the dangerous world we live in. they know all too well that what is expressed in the books is happening in reality.by reading these violent books it evokes a sense of fear or the need to harm oneself or others. Therefore stopping the chance of them reading these books is shielding them from the hurt and pain which it is associated with. Literature and media are the main reasons for violence in the

The text reveals that Daddy Norton’s religious fanaticism dominates every aspect of his family’s lives. Nonetheless, his parenting methods are analogously guided by the same ideological standards. Bottoms et al. refers to the fact that the Bible actually encourages such violent, physically abusive parenting techniques as Daddy Norton’s in the verses: "He Religion and child abuse that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes" and "Withhold no correction from the child: for if

The literature also feels and backs her opinion on violence. Violence among our youth has spread widely throughout the nation. This can be linked to several problems in our society, but mainly one. The constant barrage of television and media violence causes deviant behavior in

Many people, especially parents of school children, would be inclined to believe impressionable human beings should not be exposed to the violence seen in

When it comes to the topic of violent media, some of us would readily agree it’s a controversial subject as to whether kids should or shouldn’t be exposed to it. This is because many children who view violent media react negatively rather than not being affected at all. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of what effects does it have on children. Whereas some are convinced that it is a healthy alternative for kids to express themselves, others maintain that it causes kids to become more aggressive and contributes to juvenile crimes.

In fairy tales, children are pushed into ovens, have their hands chopped off, are forced to sleep in coal bins, and must contend with wolves who've eaten their grandmother. In myths, rape, incest, all manner of gruesome bloodshed, child abandonment, and total debauchery are standard fare. We see more of the same in Bible stories, accentuated with dire predictions of terrors and abominations in an end of the world apocalypse that is more horrifying than the human imagination can even grasp.

Violence in mass media has been constantly discussed in the past twenty years as a reasoning for teenage violence against others, between video games such as “Doom” and “Call of Duty”, movies such as “Fight Club”, “Scream”, “American Psycho”, and “Natural Born Killers” and social media dehumanizing acts of violence. Many parents have labeled anything that is not family-friendly as a root cause of criminal behavior. Others also blame the amount of violence in media now as unhealthy to young people, solely because many don’t know the line of what is real and not real. “In Cold Blood”, by Truman Capote, details the gruesome murder of the Clutter family in rural Holcolb, Kansas in November of 1959 committed by two men; Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. In Capote’s novel, he describes the motives of the killers and their backstory in order to help humanize them. Some may say that because of both the violence and the humanization of the killers, the book should be banned. However, banning the book would be censoring something important for youth to learn from. This novel should be implemented in schools to let younger generations be aware of the real world, and to be aware that not everything is picture-perfect in the world.

In Gerard Jones' essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” he argues a position not taken by many in today's culture. Jones advocates children should be exposed to violent media in order to overcome real life hardships. The problem with Jones' argument arise when he fails to develop his somewhat dated ideas and leaves his audience questioning how effective such exposure would be.

Most violent acts committed in modern times are seen as unthinkable and heinous. Today’s culture appears to be at its most serene and peaceful. However, this may not be true. Today’s culture is still one of extreme violence and is comparable to some of history’s most horrific times. Over the course of history, violence in culture has been in fluctuation but has always been considerably aggressive. Modern violent culture is comparable to history’s as society’s forms of entertainment are still violent, racial, domestic, and religious. Disputes still occur and lastly, war and cruel punishments still exist in the world. Fortunately, there is hope as violence, although still existing, seems to be improving and slowly diminishing.

Conclusively, Blackburn’s ideas explain why ethics should be distinguished as personal sentiments, instead of compliance to authoritative codes such as religious traditions. In order to assist Blackburn’s outlook on ludicrous religious attitudes, he selects a few radical illustrations from The Old Testament. Some matters which were a cause for concern to Blackburn were God’s acceptance of child abuse, slave owning societies and cruel attitudes towards disbelievers. Blackburn’s messages indicate that morals are constantly changing with social attitudes; therefore there lies a contradiction in biblical teachings of God’s word being everlasting and unchanging. From my perspective, Blackburn does not address his matters effectively due to his constant critical judgements he focuses on a preferential interpretation, as a replacement to discussing the wider connotations to these passages.

Before answering the question posed, first the etymology of the word ‘violence’ will be examined:

In the book Critique of Violence ,author Walter describes Violence as "The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, male development, or deprivation .The violence that is portrayed in the media has been debated for decades ,and it has rose a question about how does it influence the youth?. From movies to video games society has been accustom to seeing violence in their everyday entertainment. Since children are easy to be influence by their environment, it is safe to say that violence in the media can and will contribute to violent behavior.