Violent Media Is Good For Kids By Gerard Jones Analysis

He soon finds a psychologist with a PH.D named Melanie Moore who explains children who watch violent films would express their feelings better. She has gotten her research by working with students in public schools. Jones then shares the entire journey they went on to find out is watching films is bad for children’s minds. Although he is sharing the journey, in the body paragraph he did not share with us anecdote. All the writer was writing about was statistics and the information that they found, there was no true story of what the students were saying about the films.

From infancy onward, parents and teachers have drilled into the young generation that violence should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and “using one’s words” as tactics to combat difficult situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims there is an alternative way. In his essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Jones argues that “creative violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives children a tool to master their rage” (Jones). In other words, media violence, used correctly, can serve as an alternative method for powering through adolescence. By reading and writing violent stories, children are able to express

In the writing of Gerard Jones “Violent Media is Good for Kids” is very interesting essay in which he describes how violent media can help kids to overcome obstacles, but whether it is convincing or not, I am not truly sure because the way the essay is written is biased. Jones as writer is making this controversial topic to gain more audience to read his writings, in addition, this essay fails in detail, it needs more statistics to support the examples that Jones addresses in his essay. Also, we need more information about what is the opinion of parents of these kids that believed violet media is good so, we need the statistics of the studies of the psychologist that support the idea of good

Mother Jones, an American independent news organization, published the essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids” by Gerard Jones on June 28, 2000. In this article, Jones, a comic book writer, argues that violent media can have positive effects on children’s behavior. In fact, he asserts that “superhero stories helps kids negotiate the conflicts between the inner self and the public self” (60). Even though Jones’s thesis, refutation, and the conclusion are strong to support his argument, his evidence is weak to convince his audience about his point of view.

While it gives the impression that Gerald Jones could be wrong in his arguments, there is an aspect of truth at least from his case studies he took in his research. In addition, while no one would support exposure of the young children to violence and violent scenes, not at least in a stable civilization like America, it is quite evident that violent media provides the children and the young people in the society with certain message in life. It becomes clear that the

In Gerard Jones' essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” he argues a position not taken by many in today's culture. Jones advocates children should be exposed to violent media in order to overcome real life hardships. The problem with Jones' argument arise when he fails to develop his somewhat dated ideas and leaves his audience questioning how effective such exposure would be.

In the article, “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”, the author, Gerard Jones, begins by providing background information about himself. As a child, Jones was taught that violence was wrong, and as he grew up, he learned that violent comics and stories aided him to become an action movies and comic book writer. In his article, the author addresses why violent media are good for children. He points out that it helps them transform better socially, explore and conquer their feelings, and improves self-knowledge. Jones purpose is to inform readers about the positive use of violent media on children. The author uses rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, and stylistic techniques such as allusions and repetitions to create his argument.

“Violent Media is Good for Kids,” written by Gerard Jones, is an interesting argument about the positive aspects of violent media. He has narrated his own experience as a child about the impact of violent media. Jones has further developed his argument to convince parents about the importance of violent media by noting that exposing kids to violent media helps the kids to overcome their fear. Jones is focused on parents and teachers, both of whom restricts the exposure of kids to violent media. He also notes the skeptical thinking, which argues that violent media have a negative impression on kids. His argument is catchy and strong based on his own realizations of the world and experience. Let us discuss how he has made the argument realistic.

The essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids” by Gerard Jones was published by the New York Times in 2000. Jones was a well-known author both in fiction and nonfiction and mainly focused on comic books. Jones argues that the violent behaviors depicted in comic books can be beneficial because they can help children overcome their fears. Jones incorrectly assumes that all children are the same and although a comic book may help one child, other children may become emotionally scarred by them.

In the article of Gerard Jones, “Violent Media is Good for Kids” he tries to convince the audience, especially parents and persuade them the need for kids to be exposed to violent media to help build confidence. He explains that violent media can be very beneficial to kids instead of harming them. Gerard Jones uses many literary devices to persuade the audience. He uses his own childhood experiences; he shares how he was, able to overcome his challenges or as Jones states in his article overcome “passivity and loneliness”. He also uses his son to continue to persuade the audience. He shares how his son used superhero’s identities to get through challenges he faced during preschool, kindergarten and first grade years. Other examples he uses

Gerard Jones is quite a fan of The Hulk and Tarzan comic books. In his essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids” Jones argues that the violence in those and other comics teach valuable lessons that will help children understand difficult emotions. Jones states that in “try (ing) to protect our children from their own feelings and fantasies, we shelter them not against violence but against power and selfhood.” Throughout the essay Jones relies on personal anecdotes that reveal his opinions about violence in comics and other media instead of citing formal research. Jones’ personal experience is that violent media is not generally harmful, and fills an important place in childhood imagination and play.

He later wrote comic books for marvel Comics and other publishers for several years. When jones was a young boy he was inspired by marvel comics, “they were good for [him] me because they were juvenile. And Violent”. (Jones 3). Jones’s article “violence is good for kids” argues that engaging in fantasy violence can have a positive effect in children. A disagreement or agreement can occur on the topic Jones brought up, but he clearly wants the topic to be educated well enough. I can agree that destroying a child’s imagination is horrible, therefore I would agree with jones’s appeal towards parents wondering what their kids should watch. Jones attitude in the article came off as influential, convincing, and determine, and an instance was were himself and concern parent helped the parents child to socially adjust, “she came out of it just as fiery and strong, but more self-controlled and socially competent: a leader among her peers, the one student in her class who could truly pull boys and girls together” (Jones 567). The way he expressed himself throughout the article was by being helpful in a way to explain the ideals of a child’s development assuming that violence transforms us to someone good. As for Jones, he also inputs his on personal experience of “the character who caught [him] me, and freed [him] me, was the Hulk: over gendered and under socialized, half naked and half witted, ragging a frightened world that misunderstood and persecuted him” (Jones 565). Although both articles can be compared by relating to the topic of violence media affecting the

author of “Violent Media is Good for Kids”. It is undeniable that the title of Jones’s essay

In the beginning, the author described his childhood when he was little and how comic books helped him to build confidence and was able to face challenges in life. Also, when he states that many mothers think that, "violence media is bad", he then gives examples and reasons that supported his side of the argument. Also, the author points out true facts that doctors have researched and supported these facts which make it's more accurate and reliable.

Nowadays, in the world in which we live, violence is reported everywhere. It makes parents became worried. So, they try to protect their children from the adverse impacts in society. But although society has taught us that violence is not accepted, in the essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Gerard Jones tries to convince people, especially the kids’ parents, that violent media is good or furthermore, it is essential for the development of children. He uses his own childhood as an example of how media or The Hulk helped him switch to “more sophisticated heroes” (Jones 195), and “finally found my own lead along a twisting path to a career and an identity” (Jones 196). Afterwards, his son was afraid to climb a tree, so Jones read the