Violent Video Games Cause Violence In America

A huge controversy in today’s society is violent video games and their behavioral effect on the children and adults who play them. Violent video games have been blamed for bullying, school shootings, and even violence towards women. Many have fought that violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence, and that they are teaching the youth that violence is an acceptable conflict-solving strategy. Other sources have stated otherwise. The 2004 Secret Service has stated that only one-eighth of attackers have exhibited interests in video games. Violent Video games do not cause violent behavior or behavior problems because it has not been proven that there is a link between violent video games and behavioral issues, playing video games provide a safe outlet for aggressive and angry feelings and reduces violence in young children, and violent juvenile crime has actually gone down since the violent video game popularity has increased.

“According to data recently released by The NPD Group, in 2012, U.S. video game software sales reached $6.7 billion (174.8 million units) and computer game sales were $380 million (13.2 million units)” (Improving Economy). To many, the violent video game industry has turned all adolescents into mass murderers. However, they’re absolutely wrong. Very seldom do adolescents who play violent video games commit acts of violence, and the ones who do usually have a mental disorder. Instead of blaming the tragedies that occur on violent video games, the news media should explain to people that a large percentage of young males play violent video games, indicating that the two are uncorrelated. They should alternatively research other possible solutions to the crisis. In lieu of negatively affecting people’s lives, video games could potentially improve their lives!

“Violent video games increase aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, and aggressive behaviors and decrease empathic feelings and prosocial behaviors” (Gregory Ferenstein). Gaming devices not only desensitize us, but it heightens our chances of going out and committing acts of violence. Such as, James Holmes because of the games that he played (Call of Duty, Advanced Warfare and etc.) he believed that for every person he killed; he would receive a point for doing so. “There are definitely games kids shouldn't be playing, she said, for example those where hunting down and killing people is the goal)” (Anne Harding, CNN). After playing these games, many kids feel as if the real world is like a game and killing people to earn points is rewarded. Video games have changed our America to believing that death and violence should be rewarded, but with a twist and that includes handcuffs and a prison

Guns. Blood. Death. Three of the most prominent words or actions used to describe video games. Arum Steinbeck wakes up, goes to school, comes home and plays video games. His face glued to the television, he is exposed to gruesome acts of violence. Nonetheless, Arum Steinbeck is not a serial killer. How is this possible? Adolescents who play video games are killers. Dead wrong. 90% of children in the US play video games and 90% of those children play games that involved mature content. Yet, it is possible that not one of these children will grow up to commit serious acts of violence. For most of the children who do end up committing crimes other factors are involved in the equation nonetheless, society tends to blame what they cannot explain. It is easier to blame video games than to accept responsibility for our actions. To put a seranio to words say there is an adolescent drunk driver who gets into a car accident and kills a family. When in court the intoxicated driver will plead not guilty putting the blame on anyone besides themselves. We have fingers to point them. People get in trouble with the law and need a way out, society has made videogame companies a revolving door of allegations that a court of law should find the person rather than the fictional game responsible. In summary, violent video games do not cause real life violence, though some people seems to wish it did.

Video games are loved by many people. People even make money by playing video games and posting them on YouTube. But many people argue that violent video games cause real life violence in children. Many video games have actually been banned in countries. One example of this is Watchdogs in the United Arab Emirates. Violent video games do not promote violence in kids under 17 because it has not been proven to increase aggression, there are recommendations for age groups on the package because of this, and countries that have a high percentage of video games use, have low gun violence.

Video game violence and youth violence don't connect to each other based on juvenile crime rates. In fact, game sales have gone up 204% while crime rates lowered dramatically by 37% in the same time period.this info came from the us sales department and us crime rate index. This means that crime rate almost cut in half and game sales doubled is the same time period. Equally important, the us sales department and crime rate index say that in one month if that month came out with a new game they would knows is that crime rates would go down in that same month. This means that the higher that sales the less crime in that same time period. All in all, with this evidence I can say that the more games sold the less crime there is in that same day,

To begin with, video games are something kids, teens, and even adults enjoy playing every day. Video games have provided people endless hours of entertainment to people across the globe, yet people seemingly want to get rid of video games altogether. Whenever any sort of crime occurs and a report comes out that the individual plays video games, video games take the blame rather than the person who committed the crime. Video games tend to be a very common scapegoat for causing violence. However, video games may not be the cause of the crime or issue at all.

According to a 2008 excerpt from Grand Theft Childhood, a Harvard study, “...60% of middle school boys who played at least one Mature-rated game hit or beat up someone, compared to 39% of boys that did not play Mature-rated games.” (Kutner, Olsen). This research shows partial statistics of violent media on boys. For instance, distinguishing fantasy from reality may prove troublesome for some people. Actually, there is no direct correlation between violent video games and crime rate. Juvenile crime rate have been declining as video games gain popularity. For example, between 1995 and 2008 the arrest rate for juvenile murders has fallen 71.9%; in addition, juvenile crime rate declined 49.3% (Malliet). Overall, research shows, video games are inconclusive factors towards

The first question you have to ask is, “Why do people play videogames?” We have to know this before we can make a connection between violent games and violent acts. Is america using them as an innocent pastime? Almost any parent who lets their children play will probably tell you that it keeps them busy. If a child is busy they

Though video games are entertaining and increase the dexterity and computer level in people, there has been much harm that has come from violent

Over the years, the popularity of computer and video games has grown. Specifically violent video games make up more than 50 % of the top selling games. These games include violent themes that involve guns, crime, blood, and gore. There is an ongoing belief that these types of games are to blame for the many acts of violence in society and have encouraged America’s youth to act out in aggression. Several organizations, such as the PTC (Parents Television Council) have moved to discourage the development of violent games while also pushing for stronger regulations when purchasing such games. There is also debate among parents and concerns on how games can negatively influence their children. So is there a direct link between video games and violence? The truth is video games do not encourage violence in society based on several factors which include scientific studies, statistics on crime, and prevention measures adopted by game publishers.

Who here has ever played video games? Who here has ever played Grand Theft Auto? Who has played Call of Duty: Black Ops? Who has played Far Cry? Who has played Halo? These are some of the most popular video games known today, that happen to be some of the most violent video games in today’s society. Video games have been around and becoming more and more popular since the 1950’s decade. Playing these violent video games can cause many problems, which bring me to my claim being, playing violent video games can lead to violent behavior in all age groups. Over the course of this speech I will first discuss how playing violent video games leads to violent and abusive behavior. Next I will discuss how playing violent video games can lead to antisocial behavior. Finally, I will conclude my speech by discussing how playing violent video games can lead to people committing crimes.

Most of us have certainly pondered on the thought if video games truly create violent citizens, I personally believe that video games do not what so ever. One must distinguish this topic accurately and consider learning to differentiate and not have a biased or radical opinion. There have been many attempts from a number of different people who have tried to give a bad name to video games due to the simulations and realness and say that video games will create a negative environment for anyone who plays them, especially in children. Enthusiasts of video games have spent decades asserting that there is no underlying link between playing violent titles and engaging in the violent real-world behavior. Brand-new data confirms their contentions.

Violent video games provide an emotional outlet for inherent violent thoughts and feelings, which essentially deters crime. A study regarding the subject of violent youth activity found that “between 1994 and 2010 the number of violent crimes among youth offenders fell by more than half, to 224 crimes per population of 100,000. At the same time, sales of video games have more than doubled since 1996” (Corriea). These statistics communicate the idea that violent video games actually decrease the chance for people in general who express interest in violence to commit violent acts in real life, as their time will be spent engrossed in the virtual world of violent video games

Video Games do not cause violence, instead, they develop positive character traits that actually have the potential to reduce the risk of violence. People say that there is a correlation but in fact, no solid scientific evidence that clearly shows video games cause violence. People use exceptions and outliers, but they are, by their very nature, different from the rest of the dataset and therefore cannot be used to define the normality of the data set itself. Video games are also representative of art and general media. Each has been criticised in their nascent life for degrading society/individual. This is a social reaction to technological progress.