Visual Violence Experiment Essay

The main purpose of the article written by Gerald Jones is to change the public perception of violent media for kids. He argues for this by saying violent media can actually have positive effects on young people because a violent media help the young people to gain self-knowledge and sense of potency through heroic combative storytelling. In addition to this, when young people are growing, watching a media action full pool of blood, killing, stabbing, screams of agony and pleas for mercy help them pull out of the emotional trap by plunging themselves into violent story. Jones also believes that violent media are a positive influence on children because pretend to have a superhuman power helps children defeat the feeling of impotent that inescapably

And by careful meta-analysis, the conclusion came out that repeated exposure to violence not only decreases individuals’ normal negative emotional responses to violence, but also " [makes people] easier to think about engaging in violence and decreasing sympathetic and helping reactions to victims of violence" (Anderson and Berkowitz et al. 104). This means they showed a decrease in pro-social behavior, which is a voluntary behavior

Furthermore, it is pointed out that viewing violence and then later performing violent behavior has been proven to have a high correlation. In order for people to acquire a knowledge of aggressive behavior, they have to be exposed to it first. According to Steven F. Messner on JSTOR, “...residents in communities with high levels of exposure to television violence might be less likely than those in communities with lowers levels of exposure to report criminal incidents to the police.” From past researches, it was said that this is because of the possible fear and mistrust which is connected with television

In the discussion portion of the article the authors discuss the lowered reaction to the violent images in the video following the 20 minutes of violent video game stimulation. They also discuss the fact that results were quite dramatic across the different individuals and attitudes toward violence. They also give insight into their results and the implication of the GAM concerning the prevalence of lowered arousal levels to violence acts following the violent stimuli via video games. Using the GAM they discuss implications such as people’s lowered likeliness to respond a victim in a violent situation if they are not in an aroused state in the midst of the violent act.

When it comes to the topic of violent media, some of us would readily agree it’s a controversial subject as to whether kids should or shouldn’t be exposed to it. This is because many children who view violent media react negatively rather than not being affected at all. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of what effects does it have on children. Whereas some are convinced that it is a healthy alternative for kids to express themselves, others maintain that it causes kids to become more aggressive and contributes to juvenile crimes.

Since this experiment was conducted 50 years ago thinks could be different if it was conducted today. For starters I‘m unsure if such a test would be allowed to be enacted this way, but if so would kids react the same? Watching violent tv, video games, and videos is not a new thing in

Onscreen Violence: Desensitization I) Introduction a) Hook: How has television violence desensitized society and what has been affected by that desensitization? i) Throughout the years, onscreen violence has steadily been on the rise. Society, does not notice that the change has become increasingly gruesome. ii)

Violence in movies can lead to tragic, barbaric events in real life because it can lead to aggressive attitudes and desensitization for victims of cruelty and abuse. The author mentions that “ The typical American child will view more than 200,000 acts of violence, including more than 16,000 murders before age 18 … [as well as] exposure to media violence leads to aggression, desensitization toward violence and lack of sympathy for victims of violence, particularly in children.” (PG 1. Paragraph 1) Also violence in movies can teach children that it’s an acceptable way to solve problems and according to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics in 2011, students ages 12-18 were victims of 597,500

The gender of the participants is operationally defined as males or females. The dependent variable is the violent actions that the participants engage in after being exposed to the specific media content. Violence is operationally defined as the level of aggressive behaviour that the participants exhibited due to the exposure towards violent media or non-violent media. Moreover, 30 participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group that watched a single episode of the violent TV show called “The Walking Dead,” while the other 30 participants watched a single episode of the non-violent TV show called “Anne.” Furthermore, the participants were asked to assess their behaviours after being exposed to the different types of media clips, which will be measured by a 5-point Likert

The majority of people have an involuntary response to scenes of violence, often followed by changes in one's heart rate and skin conductance. The negative emotional response that follows inhibits aggressive behaviour, which provokes a helping behaviour. However, those who are exposed to violent video games or violent media, show a reduction in their skin conductance and heart rate when they are met with real violence. Young children become desensitization to these violent acts and tend to exhibit aggressive behaviours to follow. To these children, violent scenes becoming less arousing, and their exposure to media violence may reduce their physiological reaction to violence surrounding them in the real world. These behaviours may take an effect

In the article that was provided, the reporter was effectively able to interpret the brain activity involved in this study. The media focused in on the neural responses to the stimuli of the people who were playing violent video games. The researchers were expecting to see lower empathy levels in the participants in the test, but their hypothesis was incorrect. The empathy levels did not change drastically, or much at all. The last element that the researchers discovered from this experiment was that the effects of violent video games are “short lived”, which means, the impact is tremendous in any way.

The media has a way of influencing people of all ages. Specifically, violence and horror in the media are the most debated. Why do people go to watch violent movies or horror movies? They go for entertainment without realizing the physical or mental effects. Kathy Benjamin’s “5 Scientific Ways Watching Movies Effects You” and Bernie DeGroat’s “Scary Movies Can Have Lasting Effects on Children and Teens” both mention the negative effects of movies, especially horror movies, with research or studies. However, only one of the essays, “5 Scientific Ways Watching Movies Effects You,” mentions some positive effects. Statistics have shown that watching these type movies can have short and long term repercussions.

          Due to violence on television, children become less sensitive to that pain and suffering of others or to become more aggressive to others. It also makes children more fearful to the world around them. (Abelard 1) Viewing habits of children observed for many decades deduced that violence on TV is associated with aggressive behavior, more than poverty, race, or parental behavior. It also reported that a TV show contains about 20 acts of violence an hour.

As evidence has shown, children view many violent scenes while watching television, movies, or playing video games, but the question still remains: What psychological effect does violence in the media have on children? Research over the past 10 years has consistently shown that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between media violence and real-life aggression (Strasburger 129). Violence in the media can lead to aggressive behavior by children and teenagers who watch the various programs. Of course, not all children who watch television, or movies, or play video games develop aggressive behavior. However, there is a strong correlation between media violence and aggressive behavior. A study, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, examined how children's television viewing practices are related to aggressive behaviors. The results revealed that children who reported watching greater amounts of television per day had higher levels of violent behavior than children who reported lesser amounts of television viewing (Singer 1041). Witnessing violence is an important determining factor in violent behavior. The media serves as a means for children to witness violence. According to Bandura's Social Learning Theory, children imitate behavior that they see on television, especially if the person performing the behavior is attractive or if the

According to the National Television Violence Study, the context in which violence is portrayed is as important to its impact as the amount of violence. The study concluded that 66% of children’s programming had violence. Of the shows with violent content three-quarters demonstrated unpunished violence and when violence occurred 58% of the time, victims were not shown experiencing pain. That makes the children think that violence is just like riding a bike, simple as that (NTVS, 1-2).