Vlad the Impaler: The definition of Evil

One day, Vlad Dracula decided to cleanse his Kingdom of those he considered to be lazy and unproductive, those who suffered from

Each of the victim’s appendages was tied to a different horse. Then, the horses were sent in four different directions. With inexact departures, the victim was usually just yanked around until the tormentors gave up and cut off his limbs.

In the infamous novel, Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, by Mary Shelley, there have been a variety of recurring themes throughout the book, one of them being good versus evil. Good versus evil is a popular theme that appears in several movies, TV shows, as well as literature itself. According to Wikipedia.com, it means: “[...] the battle between ideologies, with one side Good, and the other Evil. Another variation is the inner struggle in characters (and by extension, humans in reality) between good and evil.” This theme is specifically crucial to the plot because it ultimately asks the readers what it means to be “human.” Shelley supports her representation by manipulating society’s behavior, questioning the limits of humans, and

The definition of evil is profoundly immoral and malevolent and is harmful or tending to harm. The most evil character between General Zaroff and Montresor according to the definition of evil is Montresor. Montresor is the most evil character because he plays a cruel joke, he has a moral compass and chooses to ignore it, and kills one of his friends.

Good versus Evil is an important concept. Evil sometimes overcomes our good but never exceeds good. The difference between evil and good is that good is an ability to have empathy and compassion towards other people. Evil is people who are selfish, self-absorbed and don’t have empathy towards others. Literature plays a vital role in developing concepts of good and evil and effectively portrays the morals of its time period. In the novels Dracula and The Strange Case of Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the authors explore the human nature of good and evil in men from different perspectives of Dracula, Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll.

It is in this way that the last parallel between the two are drawn. Vlad the impaler was actually the prince of Wallachia, and was therefore royalty. His treatment by the people around him would be reflective of his noble title. Alongside of the fact that people respected him because of his title as prince, brutality brought in the remaining respect for Vlad. Nobody would dare go against the will of Vlad. He would punish his own people just as severely as his worst enemies. People were ultimately terrified of him. Dracula obtained his respect in a similar way, but with a much less severe approach. Dracula was not of actual royalty like Vlad was, however he was the head of the castle and thus named Count. He is seen as the head of the house or in this case castle. His patriarchal hold of the household brought about it a certain dominance over everybody within the household, including the 3 women who tried to suck Harker’s blood. Dracula interrupted the scenario, stormed in with rage and ordered them back. The women seemed to be slightly afraid of him which hinted at the dominance he had over them. They obeyed his every command and made no further moves towards Harker

Batman beats the Joker. Spiderman banishes the Green Goblin. For centuries story tellers have used the basic idea of good beats bad to guide their tales. Stories of blood sucking, human possessions and other tales have been passed down generations and vary between cultures. Among the creators of the famous protagonists is, Bram Stoker, the creator of Dracula. This fictional character was soon to be famous, and modified for years to come into movie characters or even into cereal commercials. But the original will never be forgotten; a story of a group of friends all with the same mission, to destroy Dracula. The Count has scared many people, from critics to mere children, but if one reads betweens the line, Stoker’s true message can be

As shown in Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley people grow evil without the presence of others with which they can relate. If someone feels they are alone, their actions will stray from their good intentions, and soon their intentions will not be so good either. The awful deeds done by humans, including those done by Frankenstein’s Monster, are done because isolation drives people to malicious actions. Frankenstein, Walton, and the monster would all be better people if they had a companion to help them through their troubles. The actions of these characters in their solitude’s contrast to their previous actions shows that being alone is what make them evil.

There have been a lot of rulers in the world that have been remembered for great achievements. However, some rulers were terrible leaders and have been remembered for terrible things., Vlad the Impaler was one of the leaders. His decisions about how to rule made history because of their cruelty. Vlad the Impaler, who descended from Vlad ll Dracula had a unique personality, and some choices of punishments that made history.

The problem of evil is the notion that, how can an all-good, all-powerful, all-loving God exists when evil seems to exist also. The problem of evil also gives way to the notion that if hell exists then God must be evil for sending anyone there. I believe both of these ideas that God can exist while there is evil and God is not evil for sending anyone to hell. I believe hell exists in light of the idea that God is holy and just. The larger is how anyone can go to heaven. I will try to answer the problem of evil with regards to the problem of heaven and hell.

Their own citizens fearing for their lives that they may not be killed next in a violent raid or massacre that these men would often indulge themselves in. Vlad the Impaler earned his famous tittle during his second period as king. The only form of punishment at this time in Walachia was impalement, a form of torture/execution where a blunt stake was driven either horizontally or vertically through the abdomen and erected up so that the persons’ own weight would slowly slide them down the shaft, no matter the crime committed. In one account, in 1462 the invading sultan of the Ottoman empire arrived at the capital city of Targoviste where he found over twenty thousand Ottoman prisoners impaled on the outskirts of the city. Vlad left this as a deterrent to invading the invading Ottomans. Aside from the constant impalements Vlad had a problem with all the poor and sick people of Targoviste. As a way solving his problem Vlad summoned all the sick and poor to a grand feast and when they had all had their fill he had the building in which they were eating boarded up and burned to the ground with everyone inside (Top 10 Lists). Ivan the Terrible became truly terrible after his wife Anastasia had died. Ivan would frequently murder and massacre whole villages solely on the basis that they may have been traitors. One account of his massacring involved the city of Novgorod which he sacked and

    Many would say being Hanged, Drawn, and Quartered was one of the worst methods of torture. This was a commonly used method of torture in medieval England. It was often saved for prisoners convicted of high treason. First, the casualty was hanged by the neck and just before the minute he would die, he was taken to a wooden edge, where he was then laid and emasculated. At long last, both of his arms and legs were tied with ropes to four different stallions who were whipped to jerk in four different directions, eventually literally tearing the victim into pieces. The mangled limbs were then displayed over the town for all to see. This method was never used on women. As a matter of decency, women would simply be burned at the stake.

Dracula written by Bram stoker is a Novel that many people enjoyed. It talks about the good and evil. It was a Novel about suspense horror and mystery. In the novel Dracula Bram Stoker tell us the story of a vampire known as count Dracula who is known by the people of Transavia to be completely evil. I will be analysis the novel to see why Stoker wrote the book, who he wrote it for, the good people in the story, and some other analysis. First I will beginning with the reason Stoker choose to write about Dracula.

Evil never conquers because good always overcomes it. A good example of this is the book Dracula by Bram Stoker because the author expresses the nature of good vs. evil. Dracula wants to come to London because he wants to turn everyone into vampires. The basic background of the book Dracula is when Jonathan Harker, a realtor who is sent to Transylvania to complete a transaction with Dracula so he can come to England. What Harker does not know is that Dracula has a plan for world domination. Well, while Harker is on a train to Transylvania he enters “the east, a section of Europe whose peoples and customs will be for the most part, strange and unfamiliar” (Dracula, 20). Harker arrives at Bistritz on the eve of St. George’s Day,

The universe is composed of both good and evil beings. The good humans are always nice and thoughtful of other people. The evil characters, on the other hand, keep on hurting and harming their fellows. In most cases, people do not like associating with evil characters. These people are avoided, and they live a lonely life without friends. The reason is that good and evil will always be two parallel elements that will never meet. In a typical and real-world setting, good and evil characters are determined by their actions. For instance, an evil person could set a trap for luring their closest friend into danger. Conversely, in the fictional world, evil characters are differentiated from the good ones by giving them terrifying and monstrous images. The novel Dracula by Bram Stoker is one book that uses vampires to portray evil. Some people find pleasure in doing good while others find joy in doing evil to others. But everyone is entitled to choosing their paths and personalities. The question is, between good and evil, what is the noblest thing to emulate? The Dracula novel gives a series of events that answers the question. Evil will never surpass goodness, and neither will the two ever cross lines; instead, goodness will always win the battle.