Voter Fraud Research Paper

In John Fund’s reflection, the Department of Investigation went through a procedure to see how easy it was to commit voter fraud. The DOI had sent out agents to show up at 63 polling places all who “pretended to be voters who should have been turned away by election officials; the agents assumed names of individuals who had died or moved out of town, or who were sitting in jail. 61 instances, or 97 percent of the time, the testers were allowed to vote.” (Fund, pg 353) After gathering this evidence that voter fraud was possible and way easier than it seemed, they published a report which accused the city’s Board of Elections voting

The voter suppression strategy is used to influence the outcome of an election by dissuading voters from exercising their right to vote. Voter suppression should not be comparable to campaigning because the two differs significantly. Campaigning in its political sense is the ability to change voter’s likelihood of voting behavior to change their opinions through persuasion. Voter suppression on the other hand attempts to reduce the number of voters by means of suppression.

There are many arguments against the Electoral College. The most common attack on the system is that it enables a president to lose the election when they have won the majority of the popular votes (Polsby and Wildavsky 171).

In this country, we hold elections every four years to select the president. The founding fathers of our country established the electoral college to give the original thirteen states a fair voice in the election process. This country electoral called the electoral college into question on more the one occasion. In the most recent election, President-elect Donald Trump won the electoral vote over Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. This election has sent the country into an uproar and citizens of the United States are now challenging the legitimacy of the electoral college process. This paper will examine whether this process is reliable and valid when choosing the leadership of this country.

First off, if one moves to a USA territory you lose your right to vote, but if you move to another non-united states territory you still could vote, if you an asternot you can vote in space (Document from the video). Therefore, This is bad because that if one person moves out of our country they should be able to lose there right to vote, but if you are in a USA territory you still should have the right to vote. It also is a problem for people voting from a nother country because they might not be as enformed as compared from someone from the united sates that are more enformed. Therefore, The electoral college is unfair and not right because the president could win the election and not get the popular vote they on need to focus on all the small states and get the electoral college votes and you only need 231 votes to become president of the united states (Document from the video) therefore the electoral college is not accurate to the voters votes because the electoral college really matter because if we the people want a president we will not decide because there a supreme individual know what to do. Finely there have been four cases in America history when the president lost from the Electoral College when they got the popular votes (Document G). Therefore this is not accurate to the people votes, because the smaller states got more votes to win the election it was an unfair to

           The U.S. electoral system was created to give every citizen a say in who their elected officials should be, but this system has failed miserably. The right to vote is a basic right that needs be provided to every American regardless of such traits as political party, religion, or ethnicity. It is unethical to deny a person the right to vote and historically that has been a major problem in the United States. Our election system is completely corrupt and voter rights is not the only problem, strategically drawing voting districts is also a major issue. Our current electoral system is corrupt and unethical because of gerrymandering, the breaking down of the voter rights act, and voter ID laws.

The most recent case of an unfair election was the Bush vs. Al Gore Election. Robert Hall from the Sun Sentinel says that Al Gore should have won because he had 544,000 more votes than Bush, meaning that Al Gore had the majority vote. Al Gore still lost though because of electoral votes. According to Tom Landform, there have been 4 other cases like Al Gore’s where the candidate lost because of the Electoral College. This is completely unfair to the candidate because these people won their election with the majority votes that are needed but the Electoral College took their victory away from them. The public is a victim of this ongoing problem too. The public does not realize this but people’s votes are being “wasted” or thrown away. Tara Ross says that the winner take all system are “wasting” people’s votes. This happens because in an election the majority vote wins and all the electoral votes go to that party. This means that if a party wins with 50.1 percent it is equivalent to winning with 100 percent. This occurred in the Bush vs. Al Gore election also. According to Tara Ross from Democracy, Al Gore had 2.5 million people who voted for him in Texas but were wasted because of the winner take all system. The Electoral College is ruining the people’s say in who they want and what they want to happen. This system that America has is not working and needs to

In most of the presidential election, the candidate that wins the popular vote will win the electoral votes but as you seen in the election that doesn’t always happen. The electoral college creates a possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote. The candidate who receives the majority of the electoral votes which is two hundred seventy wins the election. Also, if the candidates get a tie on the electoral votes the election will be thrown in the hands of the House Of Representatives. This has happened five times out of the fifty-seven presidential elections. In 1824, the sixth president John Quincy Adams won the election against Jackson without winning the electoral or popular vote. In 1876, the nineteenth president Rutherford B. Hayes won the election even though he lost the popular vote by 250,000 against Samuel J. Tilden. In 1888, the twenty third president Benjamin Harrison won the presidency with two hundred thirty-three to one hundred sixty-eight electoral votes and he lost the popular vote ninety thousand against Grover Cleveland. In 2000, the forty third president George W. Bush won the presidency with two hundred seventy-one electoral votes while he lost the popular vote by five hundred forty thousand against Al Gore. Now president Donald Trump has become the president with two hundred ninety electoral votes while losing the

This past election has raised several questions and issues, one of them being on the effectiveness of the Electoral College. Though Clinton won the popular vote with a margin of 2,868,692 votes, Trump won the presidency because his electoral votes were greater. Many were confused as to how this could happen, but looking at a map of the U.S. county-wise, it is somewhat more believable. Most of Clinton’s votes were concentrated in major cities,unlike Trump’s which were more widespread. This allowed him to cast a wider net to collect more electoral votes. Despite this being the reasoning behind it, many question if this is the right path. In truth, the Electoral college system is very faulty in the sense that it misrepresents a large portion of American Citizens. Therefore, it requires several changes, i.e. converting to a proportional system rather than winner-take-all, to be made so it could better reflect the will of the people, without dismissing the entire establishment as a whole.

Presidential elections in the United States are commonly unfair. One might think that the presidential candidate who receives the majority popular vote would be elected president. This is not always true, because of the Electoral College, which is a “winner-take-all” system. Ever since the election of 1824, when Andrew Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams who did not win the popular vote and was elected into office because of the Electoral College, many other candidates have been cheated out of winning. The Electoral College should not stand any longer because in many elections it has prevented the candidate that the majority of the citizens voted for from winning. It would be difficult if there were to be tie in the Electoral

The Electoral College doesn’t count every vote the same and the popular vote isn’t considered. With the current system, the president, although not every time, can be the loser, and at the same time the winner. He may not get the vote of the many, but can squeeze by and get just enough votes to become president, like Donald

Last election, Donald Trump won the electoral college by 74 electoral votes, but he lost the popular vote by almost three million. The system is not fair towards the people in the election. Even the president who won is this broken system said in a 2012 tweet “The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy. The Electoral College is the current system we have for electing president. The Electoral College should be abolished and replaced because it is unfair, poorly regulated and there are better alternatives such as the majority vote.

The 2016 presidential election was an example of the discrepancy between the Electoral College votes and the national popular votes. If the last presidential election had been decided by a national popular vote, then Hillary Clinton would have won the presidency because she had the majority of votes. However, due to the design of the Electoral College, Donald Trump won the election for president in 2016; although, he lost the national popular vote. Just as some people questioned the effectiveness of the Electoral College during some of the previous elections, several people questioned the effectiveness of the Electoral College again in 2016. The debate about whether the Electoral College should be kept or

Hello, I am an elite detective named Buca from a company called Bucas organization. I and a team of researchers are going to use a time machine to travel back in time to the 3 days before Poe died in 1849. It was a sunny October 4th in 1849 with stone streets and horses carried man and conveniently I had appeared at the exact location where Poe was being used for a voter fraud called coping, and what a saw was mind-blowing. My theory from the beginning was that Poe died of coping and an overdose of alcohol which the gang who kidnapped him were giving it costly based on the events I saw I wrote a book called what really happened to Poe.

“Given that someone who is dead, is in jail, or has moved isn’t likely to complain if someone votes in his name, how do we know that voter fraud at the polls isn’t a problem?” (Fund, 1) With the amount of the general public that have been held accountable for committing voter fraud I can say that it exists. The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now is an organization that, while it intentions are for the good and public, has been known for participating in several cases of criminal activities, during election their members are arrested for voter