Vulnerable Populations

Due to the lack of money but the high demand of need of specific regimens in developing countries, researchers from developed countries are allowed to conduct trials on those citizens. In this article, Baruch Brody argues against moral criticisms given towards clinical trials in developing countries. His three arguments are the subjects weren’t treated unjustly (following an appropriate standard of justice), the subjects weren’t coerced (in terms of any plausible interpretation of the word), and the subjects weren’t being exploited (if they themselves gain access to the treatment after the study).

In this assignment I will select a vulnerable population sub-group and consider how social science contributes to understanding the social problems encountered by this group. I will do this by firstly explaining and identifying and locating the chosen sub group within the broader societal context. Next by explaining why the chosen sub group is considered to be vulnerable with reference to relevant theory and research based evidence. Then I will be identifying and explaining the role of relevant agencies, both non-governmental organisations and governmental in relation to welfare provision for the chosen sub group. Finally I will discussing the role of social science in informing public health and welfare practice in relation to the chosen

Jona’s definition of identification is that “the most educated and motivated members of society should be the candidates for research, and their agreement must be autonomous and informed to be valid.” He believes that people who are being experimented on should have a better understanding of what exactly is being done as well as all the details behind it. Patients should not be the guinea pigs in these experiments “the most highly motivated, highly educated, and the least captive members of the society” should be the ones who are being experimented on. With any case this is only justifiable if the experiment relates to the disease. The belmont report states that there are three core principles identified, respect for persons, beneficence,

The first ethical principle stated by the Belmont Report is respect for persons. “Respect for persons incorporates at least two ethical convictions: first, that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection” (The Belmont Report). The researcher must respect the subjects decisions and be obliged to allow them to take part of the experiment voluntarily. The second

Guinea pigging should not be permitted. Fair subject selection was one of the seven requirements for ethical research described by Emanuel, Wendler, and Grady (2000). The scientific goals should guide recruitment and enrollment and not vulnerability, privilege, or other factors. The reliance of the study on the amount of payments to subjects and their personal financial situation as a determinate to participation would violate the ethical value of justice. The selection of undocumented immigrants, the poor, racial minorities, other vulnerable groups violates fair selection. The reliance on recruiters and word of mouth to determine if a study is safe would indicate the lack of informed consent. This violates the ethical value of subject autonomy.

I would protect the vulnerable population from being exploited in research by telling the population all the risks involved. In the FenFluramine Case, researcher’s targeted minority groups of blacks and hispanics where they used children between the ages of six and eleven to test if violent behavior could be predicted due to the fact that their older brothers had some form of criminal behavior. There were ethical and moral concerns pertaining to the case where they did not tell the mothers about possible side effects in the experiment. I believe the researchers were not promoting any good nor did not care about using the children as a science study without even worrying about any risks involved. They violated the children and the mother’s rights

Understanding numerous vulnerable populations is important for any healthcare worker. It is important to learn about the various populations to better be able to cater specific patient-centered-care to these unique individuals. Mennonites are known to be highly community oriented, and it is not unusual to consider their fellow church members as part of their families. They rely on each other in the community for many things including healthcare. When one member of the church is ill, in a sense, the rest of the church is afflicted as well.

Societies had experienced countless financial crises associated with stock market crashes, bursting of asset price, banking panics bubble currency crises whatever the reason this had occurred the financial crises between the different countries had become more connected due to globalization. The establishment of integrated global financial, capital market crises usually more than just an economic issue. This affects the lively hood of billions of people worldwide regardless or the origin of crisis. These adversity strike vulnerable population even more in efforts to decrease vulnerability would be to form an effective risk reduction strategy. In doing this investigate the “risk” investigate “vulnerability” clarify vulnerable population this would include racial ethnic, minorities, low income children, the uninsured, economically disadvantaged, the homeless, those with chronic health conditions, severe mental

It is essential to produce valid, creditworthy, and objective research results to help benefit society (Horner & Minifie, 2011). However, research should be conducted within an ethical manner and strict principles should be followed when using human subjects in the research process. As a result, the use of human subjects came into sharp focus during the Nuremburg war crimes (Shamoo & Resnik, 2009). Therefore, a variety of human experiments during and after World War II leads to the need to protect humans in research. Nowadays, there are numerous ethical dilemmas that researchers encounter when using human subjects in research. In addition, there is a current trend of human research subjects in developing countries.

The US government has erected stringent protections for the prison populations to be left out of medical research entirely. However, such routine exclusion may harm the public good as well as the prisoners. Ethical principles for research with human subjects should be applied to avoid unconscionable violations of human rights. Further, performing medical experiments without the consent of the prisoners constitutes crimes against humanity. This

There have been many instances in science where ethical consideration for human participants has been called into question. Between 1920-1970 many ethical guidelines were put into place to ensure researchers were conducting experiments safety, ethically, and fairly. Out of all the experiments that took place within this time frame, a few stand out. These cases were groundbreaking for ethical treatment within the scope of research done on human subjects.

Biomedical research has been going on for many years, it is how we have knowledge of many deadly diseases as well as the discovery of vaccines and antibiotics! These things seem so common today, but infact went through lots of stages of research to get to the technologies we have today. However, before 1947, there were no codes of ethics or regulations to ensure that research being done was ethical. The smallpox vaccination, although the first successful vaccine to ever be developed, would be considered highly unethical today. Edward Jenner experimented on a healthy young 8 year old boy without consent. In today’s society, this study would never have been allowed to continue. There are many other

Since the United States approved the regulations that controls the research on human subjects in 1970s, there have been many discussions and arguments concerning this approval on research on humans; the issues focuses clinical research like the risk management, the use of substances (drugs) with no therapeutic effect – placebos in a group, selecting random sample of a population, informed consent, adverse events and investigation on susceptible populations. “ Most of those controversial researches no human subjects were the Department of Energy’s secret human radiation experimental exercise, HIV research in developed countries, and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study have been about medical

It is not a new idea for science to interfere with people’s sense of ethics it has been going on for centuries. However, recently these issues have become extremely personal for every human being. This is because in the medical field scientists are now able to modify humans before and after they are born. With this new technology comes a lot of ethical issues that have to be addressed. But before one can jump to conclusions and assume that these new medical advance are morally or philosophically wrong, the science behind it has to be understood. If there’s misconceptions about what really goes on in the lab it can lead to these new advances never becoming a reality. Some highly criticized scientific research done in our world today is cloning, stem cell research, and human enhancements. Exploring the scientific work that actually goes on in these advances can help to stop unjustified objection to the research being done based on ethical standards.

Over the years science has developed drastically and almost every day a new discovery is made. However, in recent years there has been one major obstacle that prevents science from moving forward and coming up with new ideas that deal with certain situations and offer hope for medical treatments, this obstacle is ethics. Ethics has become the major factor that has to be considered if one is to continue his research and development in the field of science and most of the time it has prevented science from having its ‘freedom’. There have already been many sanctions against scientific development and that has decreased the rate of development of science in certain areas such as the dissection of corpses, invasive surgery, and animal testing.