Walmart Observation Paper

Castro told me he was able to recover all of the lost except for a black Michael Kors purse, valued at $159.99. Castro said the total value of the recovered lost is $354.96. Castro gave me E-1 a DVD of the shoplifting captured on video surveillance. I booked the DVD into property as evidence. Castro said TJ Maxx desires prosecution if the suspects are located. Refer to Castro’s report for further details on the incident. See attached copy of Castro’s

Teagle 170 P.3d 266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007), defendant Teagle was pulled over after being observed speeding down the highway. When the officer approached the vehicle, he noticed two cellular phones on the dashboard, an open container of liquor, fast-food wrappers, a box of cookies, a map, and luggage and clothing in the backseat. The officer gave the defendant a warning and then asked him if there was any contraband in the vehicle or whether there was a chance anyone else could have placed any contraband in the vehicle. Although the defendant answered in the negative, the officer returned to his patrol vehicle and asked if there was a canine unit available. There was not and so the officer told the defendant that he was free to leave. Shortly afterwards, the officer saw the defendant speeding once again down the road. The officer proceeded to pull him over and gave him another warning. The officer again asked him if he could search the vehicle and the defendant answered in the affirmative. The officer called a canine unit which arrived an hour later. The canine, in proceeding to do an exterior sniff, circled around to the trunk. The officers then opened the trunk to find 338 pounds of marijuana, a can of air freshener under the driver’s seat and several toilet bowl sanitizers in the compartment ofthe vehicle as well as the trunk. These were all indicative of an attempt to mask the smell of marijuana. At trial, the defendant argued that he had taken his vehicle to a repair shop, implying that someone else had placed the drugs in the car. The court found that there was enough evidence, including the large amount of drugs in the trunk of the vehicle, the air freshener, and the inconsistent statements to determine that the defendant had sufficient knowledge of the marijuana in the

P alleges that he is a drug dealer. P alleges that from March 2010 through January 2011 defendant MOS Tepperman extorted money from him. P claims that when he refused to pay, MOS Tepperman had P arrested. P claims that MOS Tepperman was earsdropping on his cellphone conservation and tracking his whereabouts through GPS. P claims he paid MOS Tepperman money to keep the police away from him. P states that he did sell MOS Tepperman a brick of cocaine in September 2010.

Facts: August 7, 1999, a car occupied by three men, Donte Partlow (driver and owner of vehicle) accused Pringle (front seat passenger), and Otis Smith riding in the back seat, were ultimately pulled over by a police officer for driving over the speed limit. Upon the officer approaching the vehicle, he asked to see Partlow’s license and registration, and as the defendant opened his glovebox, a fairly large sum of money was exposed in the amount of $763. The officer then returned to his patrol car to check Parlow’s license to ensure he had no warrants of anything outstanding, Partlow came out clear, so he issued Partlow a verbal warning. Upon arrival of the second officer he asked if they minded he search the vehicle, Partlow had no issues and agreed to the search. The police not only found the $763 in the glove compartment but also five glassine Baggies of cocaine stashed behind the backseat armrest. The officers questioned the men as to who the cash and drugs belong too, none of them took ownership, the officers advised them that if no one claim the drugs and cash as theirs, they all would be arrested and charged. So, all three were arrested and taken to jail. Later on, in the morning Pringle decided he would waived his Miranda rights, then made a full verbal and written admission that the cash and drugs were his

Upon our arrival, Officer Ramirez and I witnessed the front door to the residence had been forcibly opened and was left wide open. The door frame was broken off and the deadbolt lock was still engaged. Officer Ramirez and I cleared the residence and did not locate anyone still inside.The cabinets to the entertainment center as well as kitchen cabinets were left open and items appeared to have been taken. I located a black and yellow Crowbar a pool table. The master bedroom appeared to have been

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that MOS entered her apartment and placed her, her parents, and brother in handcuffs and had them stand against a wall. P alleges that defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco inappropriately searched her by touching her inner thighs and buttocks. P alleges that she requested at a female MOS search her and defendant MOS Sico denied it and refused to loosen her handcuffs. Defendant Jeffery Sisco states that he was executing a search warrant after two positive controlled buys were conducted. ESU entered the apartment first and searched and handcuffed everyone then MOS Sisco and other MOS entered the apartment. MOS Sisco does not recall P asking to have her handcuffs loosen and did not search her. MOS recovered narcotics and

Upon arrival, I made contact with Walmart LP Officer, Steven Uliano. Uliano was with the Black female defendant, later identified as Chiffon Bernita Gold. Gold was being cooperative with loss prevention.

According to police reports, on 12/21/2005, the defendant, Pelkey, failed to stop at a stop sign at 2200 F Street. An officer conducted a traffic stop and vehicle search. Other officers conducted a search of his residence. Both searches discovered drugs as well as other evidence supporting the charges. The officers arrested the defendant for possession of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine for sale, and transportation of methamphetamine. The defendant went through processing at Headquarters and booking at County Jail.

Inside of the case was a plastic container containing approximately one gram of a green leafy substance, which was field tested for marijuana with a positive result. There was also a pipe and scale containing a small amount of marijuana. There was a baggie containing a white pill marked “E 79” in the case as well. I asked Elias if the pill was methadone or hydromorphone and he replied it was just something he took to fall

Officer Jimenez was advised that the subject in question was wearing a hospital gown checking the trash cans of the stated location. Upon arrival, Officer Jimenez observed a subject that matched the description. Officer Jimenez observed that the subject was standing outside the store right next to a “No Loitering” sign. Officer Jimenez asked the subject for an id and the subject retrieved a wallet out of his pocket. Officer Jimenez asked the subject if the wallet was his and the subject said no. Officer Jimenez opened the wallet and observed there were several identifying information items of at least three people that did not belong to the subject. Officers were also to locate inside the wallet a crystal like substance that tested positive for Methamphetamine. Officer Jimenez placed the suspect under arrest for Fraudulent Possession of Identifying Information and Possession of a Controlled

In the Johnson case, Mr. Johnson and his son, Sam went shopping and were falsely accused of stealing. They went to the mall and then directly to Target after the mall. After adding multiple items to the shopping cart, the previous items bought got mixed in with the items to be purchased. Upon leaving Target, Mr. Johnson was approached by a security guard who loudly accused Mr. Johnson of stealing. The security guard was loud enough for others to hear him. He also roughly pulled on Mr. Johnson’s arm telling him to go with the store manager or he would call the police. It took two hours for the store manager to prove Mr. Johnson did not steal the video game and the figurine.

Upon my arrival I contacted the complainant Nicholas Swanson and he told me the following. Around 2000 hours a white female, later identified as Sonnie R. Youngblood, entered the store through the front doors. Youngblood stopped at the popcorn stand in front of the store and picked up three bags of popcorn. Youngblood then walked to the west part of the store and returned to the front of the store with no items in her hand. Swanson said was notified by his employee that Youngblood might have placed items in her bag. Swanson checked the video footage and saw Youngblood place several items

Incident to arrest, I searched Sutton’s fanny pack and found a glass pipe, which resembled a crystal methamphetamine pipe. I then searched Sutton’s backpack and found a blue plastic container. I opened the container and saw a crystal substance inside, resembling crystal

These points together could and was found by a jury to be under Maine law, to be false imprisonment, the defendant unlawfully acted to intentionally cause confinement or restraint of the victim within a bounded area. Wal-Mart employees did use physical barriers, threating actions and did not have legal authority to

On Monday, July 25, I spent most of my time reviewing the trials scheduled for this Tuesday. Rather than attending pre-trial conferences with Liz this Tuesday, Kathleen has permitted me to sit in on one of her bargaining meetings, so I decided to only research the afternoon trials that I will sit in on rather than the usual cases scheduled for pre-trial. I am excited for this opportunity to learn more about contract law and to observe the proceedings of a bargaining meeting. There are two cases set for trial on Tuesday, each being some form of theft. The first case is retail theft, meaning that Liz must prove that the defendant violated Manitowoc municipal code ordinance 14.600 (2) stating that the defendant intentionally altered indicia of