The purpose of the ethics paper is to analyze the business decision of Walmart and if it genuine method of helping the community, or a way draw in more customers who may be addicted to drugs. Is Walmart finding a way to hide societies elephant in the room of opioid abuse? Walmart is known for it’s inexpensive goods, but has it stopped even lower with offering free opioid disposal for those who may struggle with abuse. The article focus on the fact that Walmart is attempting to slow the “abuse and misuse of the opioid drug”(Wal-Mart Inc website). I find it rather odd that a large company like Walmart, cares about the drug crisis in America all of a sudden. In this paper I will unravel this particular question of, is walmart offering free …show more content…
The particular social group that agrees with Walmart’s decision, would be the working class citizens. The working class has more stress and more difficult lives, than the higher class citizens, and to cope with their personal struggles, may lead to drug use. A positive outcome from this framework that connects with the decision is value of diversity. Walmart is setting themselves apart from other retail store by starting this new particular trend. The negative aspect is that there is no moral improvement. As long as drugs exist, there will be someone trying to get high. Walmart can change the way people dispose of drugs, but it can not persuade the people from not doing them. This framework aligns with my analysis because I think Walmart is attempting to find a way to obtain new customers. Walmart knows that they can not change human nature, so they found a method to connect to those who have a problem with drugs. Once that particular individual gains trust with Walmart, they will star to buy their products. Walmart's decision to help those who struggle with drug addiction on the surface looks like it will benefit the community, but in the grand skeem of life, offering a free service to dispose of drugs, will not change the culture of drugs in this …show more content…
On particular cause and effect that Walmart’s decision can have is; opioid users will gain trust with Walmart, therefore they are more likely to spend their money at Walmart. Allowing individuals to fully trust a company, will allow for the company to enlarge their particular customer base. A positive result of this, is that individuals who take advantage of the dispense system, will receive a sense of freedom. The freedom of not having the government know that they are drug addicts or protecting a loved one who is addicted to drugs. A negative can be the inconsistency of human nature. Yes, Walmart’s idea is different and supportive, but the individuals might not want others to know that they are addicted, so they go about disposing the drugs in their normal means. Once an individual is keen on doing something a certain way, they are liable to continue in the same manner. I personally agree that the cause and effect of the decision is solely based on people bringing in their opioids. If they are not comfortable with doing this, then Walmarts decision will catch fire in their face. Disposing drugs in a retail store may not be suitable for the individual doing the disposing. They might not want to change their environment, for which they do their business. It could work in for reducing the overall wrong disposal of the opioids, but i do
The United States of America has had a war against drugs since the 37th president, Richard Nixon, declared more crimination on drug abuse in June 1971. From mid-1990s to today, a crisis challenges the health department and government on opioid regulation, as millions of Americans die due overdoses of painkillers. Opioids are substances used as painkillers, and they range from prescription medications to the illegal drug, heroin. Abusing these substances can cause a dependency or addiction, which can lead to overdoses, physical damages, emotional trauma, and death. To ease the crisis, physicians are asked to depend on alternatives to pain management. Law enforcement cracks down on profiting drug-dealers and heroin abusers. People are warned against misusing opioids. The controversy begins for those who suffer from chronic pain, because they depend on opioids. There’s so a correlation to the 1980s cocaine epidemic, and people are upset over racial discrimination. Nonetheless, the best way to avoid this crisis is to recover the people at risk, reduce inappropriate opioid description, and have a proper response.
In the article, “Don’t blame addicts for America’s opioid crisis. Here are the real culprits” by Chris McGreal, America’s widespread opioid problem is discussed. Primarily, McGreal points the finger at multiple sources such as the FDA, pharmaceutical companies, and the government for aggravating the opioid problem. According to the author, “America’s opioid crisis was caused by rapacious pharma companies, politicians who colluded with them and regulators who approved one opioid pill after another” (McGreal). However, McGreal believes that there are multiple causes for the deadly opioid epidemic that exists today. Next, McGreal states that money is one of the main reasons for the epidemic of opioids. The author asserts that patients are given
On the other hand, Sebastian Mallaby cares for the customer and the profits of the company, rather than the worker and their working conditions and wages. He suggests that Wal-Mart actually saves people money and is “a progressive story” (620). Their discount on food alone increases the welfare of the shoppers by fifty billion dollars a year. If you were to count all of Wal-Mart’s products into that same estimate, it would increase ten times. “This is very good news for poor and middle class families,” says Mallaby, because in this situation the customer really comes first. Even though the workers are not treated the best, they still have an advantage over the shoppers. They have less pay, but receive discounts on all of Wal-Mart’s merchandise whenever they shop there, which should be a plus for them. Compared to most companies Wal-Mart
Walmart is the world's largest company by revenue (approximately four hundred and eighty billion dollars) and the largest private employer in the world with two point three million employees. Walmart is also one of the world's most valuable companies by market value, and is also the largest grocery retailer in the U.S. “One Nation Under Walmart” is a case about how Walmart has taken over the retail business and the effects of their market domination. The case also shows statistics of how much percentage Walmart is of many suppliers’ sales. According to the case Walmart has a 30% market share of all household items. Twenty-eight percent of Dial’s business and twenty-four percent of Del Monte’s business go through Walmart stores. It is also worth noting that Walmart imports ten percent of all United States imports from China. The case states that Walmart is able to offer cheaper prices because they put so much pressure on their suppliers to lower their prices. The case, “One Nation Under Walmart”, explains the problems that some people have with the massive retailer. One of these problems is how Walmart has forced numerous local businesses to close their doors through their extremely competitive pricing. They are able to purchase bulk goods at such low prices and thus pass the savings onto customers. As a result of these lew costs, rivals are driven out of business which results in a loss of jobs. Jobs are vital to the success of a community and with Walmart causing job
Studies have highlighted how socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and unemployment, correlate with higher rates of opioid use and overdose deaths. This is a premise of which Macy's declares that the opioid crisis cannot be addressed in terms of individual interventions and demands only through systemic reforms in order to address underlying social and health inequities.. "Dopesick" presents a compelling argument that the opioid crisis gripping the United States was not simply a result of individual choices or addiction, but rather a complex issue rooted in systemic failures across multiple levels. Macy's narrative exposes how aggressive pharmaceutical marketing, inadequate oversight, and societal challenges combined to fuel the epidemic of opioid addiction and overdose deaths. Studies from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), investigative journalism from sources like The Washington Post, and academic research published in journals such as JAMA, further reinforces Macy's central
Everybody reaches out of pocket to pay for different prescription drugs. Parents for children, elderly for health conditions, and pet owners for pets, but there is one extensive concern; the price and outcomes. Transiently, it may be common for someone to come out of pocket for some prescriptions, but when people draw out of pocket every time just to pick up a prescription drug, it becomes annoying and upsetting. Pharmaceutical companies like CVS and Walgreens collect over $1,000,000 dollars just from gouging people for medications. According to David Belk (M.D.), Pharmacies buy medication in mass from pharmaceutical corporations and suppliers, then sell for a profit. What everyone is trying to ask the companies though is why. Why would a top-producing company like CVS or Walgreens sell expensive medications to a group of people like the elderly for profit?
Authors use a number of different tones, settings, themes, characterizations, and points of view in order to create a fictional world inside the readers head. We see these tools used in contrasting ways in “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson. The distinctive techniques used in these short stories leave you feeling uneasy once you finish them. Using different methods, both authors create a story of horror for their readers.
The public was scared that purchasing Wal-Mart products could kill them. Unlike Johnson & Johnson, Wal-Mart was not suffering from a murderous product, it was dealing with an image problem and potential legal implications. While Johnson & Johnson was forthcoming and honest about the problems that they faced, Wal-Mart chose to go against its own code of ethics and cover up the problem. While the corporate giant has spent over $650 million on its internal investigation, and it create a Global Compliance program, their actions point to a company that is merely playing damage control instead of a Johnson & Johnson style overhaul.
People in Florida are experiencing a rapid increase in opioid use. Thousands of families will and have been affected by the epidemic including children. Opioids are prescribed medications that is used in treating pain. If not taken properly, opioids can lead to an addiction that will forever change your life. The main prescribers of opioids are medical professionals, who choose to run ‘pill mills’. While running these ‘pill mills’, professionals are getting rich and ruining the lives of many.
While Walgreens is exposed to all the general ethical conundrums of the business world, the highly regulated “Pharmacies and Drug Stores” industry does not give much room for them to act unethically.
Opioids are taking over the United States with its addictive composition, once patients are take opioids there is no escaping. The drug directed from opium which is obtained from a plant (Katz). Opioids are most commonly found in prescription pill from making underground sales more common. Since opioids are derived from a plant this makes the reality of home grown drugs more of an issue. American citizens overdosing on opioids is what is sparking the crisis because opioid “overdoses killed more people last year than guns or car accidents” (Katz). Opioids are extremely addictive and that is why so many citizens overdose on these types of drugs. After patients become hooked on opioids their body constantly is needing more and more opium to escape they pain they think they are enduring. The overdosing of Americans is not a small percentage of the population either, it is estimated that “over two million people in America have problem with opioids” proving this growing issue is an ongoing crisis (Katz). The United States government needs to take action immediately to the opioid crisis because doctors are overprescribing patients because they seemingly overreact to pain, and opioids are one of the most addictive drug types in the world.
In the story “Death of a Sales Man,” Willy Loman is a man who wants the best for his family but goes about it in all the wrong ways. The society Loman lives in believes every house hold should have certain luxuries. These luxuries that he craves end up being his reason for all his troubles. Loman is all about success and appearances. He is someone who is concerned with being well-liked as he also wants his sons to share his beliefs that he holds.
In America, the use of opioids is at an all time high, it has became such an issue nationwide, that it has became an epidemic. Because of the opioid epidemic, America is tearing apart, children all across the country are dying everyday, these children are dying from overdoses due to poisoning. The opioid problem is not just because of a person's decision to pick up a needle or a pill bottle, but it is because in the 1990’s doctors gave up on trying to treat patients for their overwhelming pain and discomfort, causing opioids to become over prescribed. Due to the carelessness of America, opioids are being distributed more and more everyday, causing the skyrocketing number of deaths.
In the last two decades, opioid addiction started affecting more and more Americans. But who is at fault for this epidemic? The pharmaceutical companies. They make and distribute their drugs to doctors and pharmacies and are making billions off the American worker’s dollar. All while, lying to doctors about these miracle drugs effectiveness and advocating against protective measures for the drugs.
Even though people need their prescriptions, the abuse of them is getting out of control and we need to find a way to regulate it better,because it can destroy a family, cause some to become addicted, or even kill them. Prescription drugs are no joke, they can be worse than illegal drugs like marijuana, cocaine, and even heroin. The only difference is a doctor can prescribe these types of drugs. The problem we run into with prescription drugs is there is not enough being done to keep the person from becoming addicted or them selling to others. In 2007 2.5 million Americans abused just painkillers (Drug free world). That is not even including the other two types. Now it is starting to affect teens, one out of every ten teenagers admit to abusing a prescribed drug(Drug-free world).