preview

Walmart's Free Cultural Relativism

Good Essays
Open Document

The purpose of the ethics paper is to analyze the business decision of Walmart and if it genuine method of helping the community, or a way draw in more customers who may be addicted to drugs. Is Walmart finding a way to hide societies elephant in the room of opioid abuse? Walmart is known for it’s inexpensive goods, but has it stopped even lower with offering free opioid disposal for those who may struggle with abuse. The article focus on the fact that Walmart is attempting to slow the “abuse and misuse of the opioid drug”(Wal-Mart Inc website). I find it rather odd that a large company like Walmart, cares about the drug crisis in America all of a sudden. In this paper I will unravel this particular question of, is walmart offering free …show more content…

The particular social group that agrees with Walmart’s decision, would be the working class citizens. The working class has more stress and more difficult lives, than the higher class citizens, and to cope with their personal struggles, may lead to drug use. A positive outcome from this framework that connects with the decision is value of diversity. Walmart is setting themselves apart from other retail store by starting this new particular trend. The negative aspect is that there is no moral improvement. As long as drugs exist, there will be someone trying to get high. Walmart can change the way people dispose of drugs, but it can not persuade the people from not doing them. This framework aligns with my analysis because I think Walmart is attempting to find a way to obtain new customers. Walmart knows that they can not change human nature, so they found a method to connect to those who have a problem with drugs. Once that particular individual gains trust with Walmart, they will star to buy their products. Walmart's decision to help those who struggle with drug addiction on the surface looks like it will benefit the community, but in the grand skeem of life, offering a free service to dispose of drugs, will not change the culture of drugs in this …show more content…

On particular cause and effect that Walmart’s decision can have is; opioid users will gain trust with Walmart, therefore they are more likely to spend their money at Walmart. Allowing individuals to fully trust a company, will allow for the company to enlarge their particular customer base. A positive result of this, is that individuals who take advantage of the dispense system, will receive a sense of freedom. The freedom of not having the government know that they are drug addicts or protecting a loved one who is addicted to drugs. A negative can be the inconsistency of human nature. Yes, Walmart’s idea is different and supportive, but the individuals might not want others to know that they are addicted, so they go about disposing the drugs in their normal means. Once an individual is keen on doing something a certain way, they are liable to continue in the same manner. I personally agree that the cause and effect of the decision is solely based on people bringing in their opioids. If they are not comfortable with doing this, then Walmarts decision will catch fire in their face. Disposing drugs in a retail store may not be suitable for the individual doing the disposing. They might not want to change their environment, for which they do their business. It could work in for reducing the overall wrong disposal of the opioids, but i do

Get Access