War Crime Research Paper

The Geneva conventions are a group of treaties on treatment on the public, (POWs) prisoners of war and soldiers who are differently concluded hors de combat, or incapable of fighting. The leading convention was admitted by the International committee for relief to the Wounded (that became the International committee for the Red Crescent and Red Cross). This convention made a treaty which was designed to protect sick and wounded soldiers during wartime. The Swiss government agreed to hold the conventions in Geneva, and couple of years later, an alike agreement to protect shipwrecked soldiers was produced. In 1949, subsequent to World War 2, 2 new conventions were added on from the original 2, and all four of them were confirmed by a lot of countries.

After World War II, the trials of war criminals established the new beginning of international war crime prosecutions. Thousands of atrocities that occurred in the war fields had been documented- ranging from murders, rapes, torture, and overall inhumane mistreatment of non-combatants and prisoners of war. In an attempt to further prevent these from happening, war crimes are punished to protect humanity, maintain peace and prevent future incidents from occurring. The punishment for war crimes establishes that criminal actions against innocent people are not justifiable, and will not be tolerated, even in the most permissive situations of war. Furthermore, since the definition of war crimes has been established to prevent cruelty against other

Crimes against humanity as defined by the ICC any of the following acts that are committed in widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: murder; extermination; enslavement; deportation or forcible transport; imprisonment; torture, rape/sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; persecution against an identifiable group on political, racial, national, ethnic,

Crime and criminals go hand in hand, it happens almost everyday, anywhere, and anytime. A person might just come out from the front door of their house and boom, get shot and killed instantly. There are a lot of horrible people out there that in the act of assassinating kill someone that has nothing to do with what or who they were looking for. One thing that can be assured is that no one gets up one day and decides to go attack someone for no reason. In many cases innocent people are hurt, some may say it is destiny and it is suppose to happen that way. Others say God wanted it to happen that way, but the real question is can something like this be prevented? On Monday 27th 2017 an 8 year old girl was killed sitting in the back seat of her

The Geneva Convention impacted Global affairs by defining war crimes and how to remain humane in a time of war. The Four Geneva Conventions were created by Henry Dunant, after he witnessed a battle aftermath. The Four Conventions talk about how to treat a prisoner, how to treat civilians, how to release a prisoner, and many more things. These articles and rules helped created the “Rules” for war, and what not to do in a time of war.

Our world ignores the issues and epidemics caused by war. Innocent people all over lose their lives due to combat even when they do not involve themselves in it. Some are even forcibly recruited and must surrender to orders given to them no matter how gruesome. An article titled “Children in Somalia Facing War Crimes,” a speech given by former president Jimmy Carter, and a Pulitzer Prize nominated photograph taken by Tyler Hicks show evidence of the subject at hand.

The rise of treaties, protocols, commands, and case law assets to both the achievements and limits of an engaged international community. In Part II of this article, it outlines the global phenomenon of child soldiery. The problem torments boys and girls, but it is not appropriate to harm girls, who often stomach the additional indignity of sexual slavery and forced marriage to the leaders of the armed forces. (Part III) of this article examines the international legal framework recently drawn up to ban child soldiery. This part of the article included the First Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions and the Second Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions (AP1 and AP2), The 1989 Convention on the Rights of Children, the 1997 Cape Town Principles( the principle in which list social programs for child soldiers), the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court( court law which criminalized the enrollment of children into the armed groups), and the 2002 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Children(OPCRC), protocol which encouraged violating states to crack down on the practice. (Part IV) investigates the contributions made by recent international criminal courts in the proscription process. Finally, (Part V) surveys the United Nations’ various attempts to solve dying problems for our children who went to war.

Although the definition of a crime itself is stagnant, the study of criminology is continuously evolving as society changes. This is referenced in the article “The Crime of Genocide.” When WWII began and the world was facing the fairly new issue of mass homicide solely motivated by demographic characteristics, the terms mass homicide and war crimes hardly seemed fitting. Criminologists were dealing with an entirely new form of criminal behavior against humanity. They needed to determine the nature and cause of these heinous acts before they could attempt to combat them. This article also touches on the overuse of the term genocide in an effort to bring attention to situations

Individuals who commit war crimes and genocide undoubtedly deserve severe punishment, and their victims deserve justice. Though this sentiment would likely be agreed upon by a majority of people, the logistics of how exactly to carry out this punishment and procure justice are widely debated. Recently, international courts and tribunals have been set up to try individuals for war crimes and bring justice to the victims of these war crimes. However, these international courts and tribunals are often ineffective. Throughout this paper, I will explain why I agree with Adam Smith that domestic or hybrid courts are preferable over an international court system.

The Geneva Convention was the place where a list of rules was made to save and protect the lives of those that were involved in the war.

Jocknick and Normand argue that the IHL cannot be used to “humanize war” and that they may impose states to create “effective humanitarian limits on the conduct of wars.” They also outline the importance of understanding the events of “past legal effort to regulate war” in an attempt to reassure that mistakes are prevented and that outcomes in regards to protecting civilians can be better predicted. However, this is not always the case with international humanitarian laws. Today, the Geneva Conventions remain to be an important doctrine of the body of International Humanitarian law as it contains the rules that protect people who are not a part of the armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions did not change after the article Theodor Meron published. However, I believe that the Geneva Conventions should take some of his ideas about international law into

Should we have entered Iraq even though we were not absolutely positive that they were in possession of weapons of mass destruction? We had two choices to choose from at the time: 1) we could take our chances, not go into Iraq, and put Americans’ and many other people's lives at risk or 2) we could go into Iraq, find the weapons of mass destruction, and confiscate them.

War has been an ongoing thing for many centuries that we have become far accustomed to. From the very first World War to the present day, the world has not gone a day without a break of violence somewhere in the world. War is seen as the ugliest thing in the face of mankind and yet “Most of us have been conditioned to regard military combat as exciting and glamorous- an opportunity for men to prove their competence and courage.” (Lama). Many young men see the opportunity of going to war as the moment of their life to prove something, but why go so far as going to war? “I think there’s a lot of cultural reinforcement. You know, you’re not a man until you’ve done something really difficult, and war is very difficult.” As stated by Sebastion Junger a Wesleyan University graduate, author, journalist and documentary filmmaker (Gault). The world leaders today have to reestablish a sense of stability and security in the mind of its citizens. Although war is sometimes a necessary option, the effects it has on the global community is big.

The Geneva Conventions embody “strongly felt humanitarian ideals” which is the main source of their legitimacy. These treaties allow the international community to work together and agree on certain standards of war and human rights. The Geneva Conventions are an important aspect to the field of international relations. These treaties embody the commonly felt humanitarian ideals of the majority of the world, which proves that the international community can work together and agree on human rights. This element of teamwork across the international community contributes to the idealist view of international relations. The idealist view claims that ideas and traditions are what brings countries together, ends war, and facilitates globalization; typically laws and traditions vary per state, but sometimes they can transcend borders.

Article 7 of the Rome Statute, Crimes against Humanity defines murder and extermination. A crime against humanity occurs when a party commits a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population that includes certain acts such as