Warrantless Surveillance Research Paper

Technology has become very effective for a thriving generation, but it also possesses a handful of flaws that counter the benefits. Technologies help people post and deliver a message in a matter of seconds in order to get a message spread quickly. It also gives individuals the power to be the person they want to be by only showing one side of themselves. But sometimes information that had intentions of remaining protected gets out. That information is now open for all human eyes to see. This information, quite frankly, becomes everybody’s information and can be bought and sold without the individual being aware of it at all. However, this is no accident. Americans in the post 9/11 era have grown accustomed to being monitored. Government entities such as the NSA and laws such as the Patriot Act have received power to do so in order to protect security of Americans. However, the founding fathers wrote the fourth amendment to protect against violations of individual’s privacy without reason. In a rapidly growing technological world, civil liberties are increasingly being violated by privacy wiretapping from government entities such as the NSA, Patriot Act and the reduction of the Fourth Amendment.

Big Brother is a term used in the book 1984 by George Orwell. This term is used to describe a person or an organization that gains total control over people’s lives, it exercises complete control by doing things such as, creating a new language, destroying history, taking away rights so the people become powerless and all sources of communication are recorded and stored by “Big Brother”. George Orwell predicted this would happen in his book 1984 he predicted that we would live in a society in which everything is controlled and monitored. Slowly but surely his prediction is becoming correct, we are losing rights, The National Security Agency (NSA) is spying on everything we do, all text messages, phone calls, emails, anything that goes through the internet or a wire is being recorded by the NSA, and the media is being controlled by the government, being allowed to say what they please, and whatever to keep our heads forwards and our eyes closed to the atrocity that is our government. There are many questions that need to be asked, and connections that need to be made, and those are not being provided by our government. This paper will determine the connections, answer the questions and answer one question, is america truly free? This paper will shed some light for the blind to see if we are truly free, or if the the government is controlling us, if the NSA is spying on us, if the police force is doing their job and many other things. We will know if we need to

The New York Times addresses that your phone is being tracked by the government, they explain the government supervises through our phones as well through our messages.. (Maass,Rajagopalan 66). This is another example that the government is starting to get more and more access to popular accessories that citizens use to spy on them. “...Google’s privacy protections are false he supports this claim by stating law enforcement agencies seem to have easy access to the data.” (Henderson 72). This article shows how websites claiming to protect your information give law enforcement easy access to invade your privacy and obtain your information. The discussion of power and control of the government seen in George Orwell’s 1984 almost directly parallels the government in our modern day society. Technology is used to exploit the unaware citizens under the government. Resources given to those with legal power use this power with an illegal advantage.The violation of the 4th amendment by the government shows how our private rights are being

The last state to allow a warrantless arrest of a domestic disturbance is California. About 1996 the law modified allowing for a warrantless arrest for domestic brutality offenders. Allowing for a warrantless arrest does not assure that law enforcements will make an arrest in a domestic disturbance incident. In California, a domestic disturbance incident is a low priority for law enforcements due to it being a misdemeanor. However, considering if law enforcements made a domestic dispute a superiority perhaps it can save a majority of civilian's lives.

James Stacey Taylor's article, "In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance" begins reviewing the concept of "Big Brother" as it was originally presented in George Orwell's 1984. The Big Brother started off as a fictional character in 1984-- a dictator of Oceania within a totalitarian state. Set within a society in which everyone is under complete surveillance by the authorities, mainly by telescreens, the people are constantly reminded of this by the phrase “Big Brother is watching you” (Wikipedia) . Taylor goes on to explain some examples of recent surveillance technology and how it is applied in lives today. An interesting note and comparison between today’s technology and

The Fourth Amendment makes certain that people are protected within themselves and “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” Although the Fourth Amendment protects the privacy of people, today’s technology has led to privacy issues that need to be addressed. For illustration, when people comment on Twitter, Twitter and a few other digital companies keep all the comments a person has ever posted. Similarly, warrants must be used at all times if people are seizing information from someone, but searching through metadata does not need a warrant and there is no cause. Another issue is surveillance captures people with cameras, and people who have not committed a crime are still being watched, but security people do not need a warrant

In the wake of all the "leaks" by Edward Snowden of the National Security Agency's collection programs and the resulting debate over those programs, one constantly hears from elected officials and the commentariat about the need to strike the right balance between privacy and security. More often than not, this is followed by a suggestion that, as a country, since 9/11, we haven't. Putting aside for the moment that no one has come up with evidence that the NSA, in spite of all the powerful capabilities it has at hand, has done anything untoward, the common refrain is that we are only a step away from the era of "Big Brother."

Many Americans inquire this question concerning their privacy: is government-monitored internet usage constitutional? Is it okay for the U.S. government to view American citizens' email, social media, and internet activity in order to prevent bullying, crimes, and terrorism? These are burning questions that many Americans ask in this digital age. Several Americans wonder if this act of surveillance may become an invasion of privacy and to what extent the government may use these surveillance technologies. Many innocent Americans believe that this viewing of internet usage is breaking the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which states that citizens have principal constitutional protection against government spying. If the government begins to view citizens' internet activity, is it a violation of every American's Fourth Amendment rights?

Everything you do is now being watched thanks to NSA. Americans are at risk of their privacy being revoked. Although, it seems as we are able to keep things to ourselves on our devices; NSA has other ideas. From installing cookies in your computer to drones following you on the street, there are tons of new ways to be tracked. $10.8 billion of taxpayer dollars is going into NSA to get new surveillance. Shockingly, even your face can be tracked; you may want to think again before changing settings on your phone to unlock with your face or fingerprint. As technology becomes such a big part in our lives, maybe we should consider cutting back. The government is working quickly at adding more public surveillance; this could be good for some reasons,

must be directed exclusively at protecting national security interests of the United States or our allies;

According to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Yet, in the United States at this very moment, the government is collecting information on everyone who makes a call, sends an email, plays a video game, or even owns a computer. They are in people’s houses without actually having to be there. This collection of information is unlawful, and unconstitutional, violating exactly what the government

1984, a novel by George Orwell, represents a dystopian society in which the people of Oceania are surveilled by the government almost all the time and have no freedoms. Today, citizens of the United States and other countries are watched in a similar way. Though different technological and personal ways of keeping watch on society than 1984, today’s government is also able to monitor most aspects of the people’s life. 1984 might be a dystopian society, but today’s condition seems to be moving towards that controlling state, where the citizens are surveilled by the government at all times.

have many similarities in the way of tracking their citizens as stated before. For example the article “That’s no Phone. That’s me Tracker” the authors, Peter Maass and Megha Rajagopalan, talk about how cell phone companies gather information through GPS technology and smartphone apps, “Every year, private companies spend millions of dollars developing new services that track,store, and share the words, movements and even the thoughts of their customers” (paragraph six, quote used by author, stated by Paul Ohm). This implies that data is constantly being recorded for the companies. Not only is this information beneficial for the government as a tactic for crime prevention/solving but also for advertisers. Apps like snapchat, instagram, facebook, twitter are all free because the companies want to be able to see the kind of things that people are interested in to advertise merchandise and other things. In the article the authors inform their audience by stating that cell phones are losing their purpose, the purpose of making phone calls. “...showed that making calls is the fifth-most-popular activity for smartphones; more popular uses are showing that social networks, playing games and listening to music. The smartphone is taking over the functions that laptops, cameras, credit cards, and watches once performed” (paragraph

The government obtains this feature to an advantage having the competence to trail down an inhabitant. Meena Hart Duerson mentions that 84% of people cannot go a day without their phones. Considering this it can be assumed that a vast amount of people have their phone with them at all times, this procreates it to be remarkably simple for the government to track a citizen location when having a phone. As stated by washing blogs “AT&T and Verizon had responded to at least 1.3 million law enforcement request for cell phone location and other data”. Cell companies are not required to ask for a concession from a customer every time the government inquiries personal information. According to Mike Dona Version is one of the top most wireless carriers with about 140,000 million customers and in second is AT&T with 130,000 million customers, multiple customers who purchase from these carrier companies are unconscious about their private information being given out to the

No person is safe from surveillance these days with the expansion of technology. With prices dropping dramatically most consumers have at least one device with internet connection with some sort of camera attachment. From Snapchat to Facebook it is nearly impossible to avoid being captured unwillingly. The data collected by these applications are not limited to the photo itself but much metadata, such as the location and time, are stored. Government agencies may request this information and companies could pay for Facebook users’ data to place directed ads based on individual consumer preference. The problem is when government agencies and companies use the information the people request to remain private to manipulate their own malevolent agendas. This is exactly the case in 1984, where telescreens capture most of the people's movements, even in their own homes. Unfortunately, most people in the USA suffer the same type of surveillance. Research shows that “Every day you leave your home, your image is caught on surveillance cameras at least two hundred times, it is estimated… Cameras monitor us while we shop, ride elevators, tour museums, stand in line at banks, use ATMs, or merely walk down streets, desensitizing us to unceasing observation and recording” (Boghosian and Laphan, Spying on democracy, p.26).