Warren And Brandeis Define Privacy

Privacy (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/privacy) is being by ourselves. “The state of being free from unwanted or undue intrusion or disturbance in one's private life or affairs; freedom to be let alone.” “Freedom from damaging publicity, public scrutiny, secret surveillance, or unauthorized disclosure of one’s personal data or information, as by a government, corporation, or individual.” Having a state of concealed/secrecy.

Privacy, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is the quality or condition of being secluded from the presence or view of others, and the state of being free from public attention or unsanctioned intrusion. Interestingly, the Constitution of the United States does not expressly protect a person 's right to privacy; there are however some provisions to privacy within the Bill of Right and the Amendments to the Constitution. Among them are the first amendment, that ensures the privacy or belief, the third amendment, that ensures the privacy of home, and the fourth amendment, that ensures the privacy of person and possession.

As Oliver Diggelmann and Maria Nicole Cleis wrote in a 2014 article published in the Human Rights Law Review, the right to privacy has two distinct meanings: “privacy as freedom from society” and “privacy as dignity.”

"59 Radio Address about the American Right of Privacy. February 23, 1974." American Reference Library - Primary Source Documents, Jan. 2001, p. 1. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mih&AN=32360825.

"There is no explicit mention of privacy in the United States Constitution. But the courts have found a constitutional basis for privacy rights in the broad sense of freedom from interference in certain intimate realms of personal life. This is based on the protection of individual liberty from government interference in the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution. 3 The First Amendment protection of the freedoms of speech, assembly, religious practice, and so on, could also be seen as privacy protection in this sense. On the other hand, the right to free speech could be used to defend someone who invaded the privacy of others by publishing or disclosing their personal information.

In 1787, the constitution was born. The constitution has been America’s guideline to the American way of life. Our US constitution has many points in it to protect America and it’s people from an overpowered government, our economy, and ourselves. The only thing the constitution doesn’t directly give us, is our right to privacy, and our right to privacy has been a big concern lately courtesy of the National Security Agency (NSA).(#7) Although our constitution doesn’t necessarily cover the privacy topic, it does suggest that privacy is a given right. Some people say that the right to privacy was so obvious, that our founding fathers didn’t even feel the need to make a point about it.(#9) It also didn’t help

A government like that portrayed in 1984 does not gain that amount of power overnight. It is gained in small steps over a long period of time. The people underneath a government who are doing this just think, “Oh, the laws are not that bad,” or “It is for our own good.” With enough time, the laws become to control people instead of to protect them. In the United States, there is a constant battle between government power and the freedom of the citizens. In the past decade, the amount of people who regularly use the Internet has skyrocketed because of the services that are provided, such as social networking, email, banking, and the ability to pay bills online. To effectively use these services requires personal information to be entered. Much

Privacy in America is a pretty big issue, with the whistle blower, Snowden, leaking information on the NSA, many people across the country and the world have become weary of just how much the government can access out personal information. I am pretty unnerved by the fact that the government can look up almost anything about me and I wouldn’t know. I understand that they do this in the name of protecting America, but there needs to be some kind of regulation there so that the people don’t feel so vulnerable and that they have no privacy.

What is the definition of privacy? According to Merriam-Webster, it is the quality or state of being apart from company or observation or the freedom from unauthorized intrusion. This definition implies that one has the ability to isolate onself or even information about onself, and is thus able to express oneself freely and secretly. While “privacy” and what is considered “private” differs across cultures and societal norms, the common themes remain. When an individual deems something “private”, this usually suggests that this object in particular is intrinsically special or sensitive for him or herself. With the emergence of 21st century technologies (such as smartphones) and of public knowledge of global government surveillance (NSA, Snowden),

In fact, these codes of ethics work in a kindred approach as with the ethical principles (Gillon and Lloyd, 2001). The principles are autonomy (respect others), beneficence (do good), non-maleficence (do no harm) and justice (treat others equipollently) (Beauchamp and Childress, 2001; Duquenoy et al., 2005). It is important to realize that these principles are the backbone of the sundry ethical theories (Ridley and Wickham, 1998).

Privacy can be a sore subject for many people, but what does is really mean? Privacy is the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. The majority of the population would be uncomfortable knowing that someone knows just as much about their personal life as they do themselves. Without privacy one can feel a sense of being exposed. Although, a large amount of people in society don’t really express their importance of privacy until it is actually breached. In my mind privacy is something that everyone should have until a certain extent. I can understand if government or the law were to get involved in your privacy if they see a reason too. If the person interfering with your privacy doesn’t have lawful

“A regard for privacy is a belief that we must maintain human dignity, and that is the core objective of human rights (Jørgensen, 2006)”. As Jorgensen so clearly states, privacy is a fundamental base of human rights. Privacy is often overlooked by most people and is taken for granted until it effects themselves. Privacy is a basic human right and should be treated as such. Basic individual rights should not be taken away from the people, but if someone does something incriminating to abuse this basic right they should have it revoked immediately under a certain degree. The judicial system constantly changes how this right is interpreted throughout historical court cases, court cases that define privacy in numerous ways.

I define the meaning of privacy as a basic human right to be able to keep one’s personal information, activities and communication protected against public observation. Oxford English Dictionary defines the meaning of privacy as: “The state or condition of being alone, undisturbed, or free from public attention, as a matter of choice or right; seclusion; freedom from interference

Over time, the meaning of privacy can be altered and described in so many ways making it unique to every individual. New apps and social sites like Instagram, Facebook, instant messaging, and Snapchat has made it easier for everyone to share moments of their life with others around the world. It is believed by many citizens that things that are not shared on social sites and blogs by them are automatically kept private but that may not be the case. In a recent article called Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets, author Peter Singer goes into discussion describing the meaning of privacy in the modern world. Reveling that the government and other authoritative figures are using their powers to invade in citizens everyday life with the impression that it will help keep the world we live in a safer place. There are websites that Singer provides in the article called Wikileaks and Anonymous that are created to release government official documents and tabs on citizens basically showcasing that the government may be doing more than just protecting citizens. There is no doubt that the population is rapidly growing which means there is in increases in the amount of dangers people are subjected to be exposed to on the daily basis. It is the responsibility of the government and police officials to ensure that everyone feels safe and protected but it should not be at the expense of violating innocent individual’s privacy. All citizens should believe that because they are

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;” (1st Amendment, Constitution of the United States of America) The founding fathers of America believed the people had a right to voice their opinions, no matter their viewpoint. They believed the press should be able to inform the public unhindered by political parties and high ranking officials. The founding fathers considered these things essential to the establishment of a free nation. These Rights stated in the Constitution helped shape our country, they allowed us to become what we are today, to permit a sense of trust and assurance throughout the populace. But the question could be asked “Have we grown too comfortable and thus started to abuse the rights given to us?”