Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero Dbq

Andrew Carnegie was one of the wealthiest men in America but his wealth didn’t come without hard work and dedication. Carnegie was born in “Dunfermline, Scotland on November 25, 1835” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle, the invention of the weaving machine unfortunately pushed Carnegie’s family in to poverty “In 1848, Carnegie’s family left Scotland and moved to Allegheny City, Pennsylvania, where his father and eventually him worked in a cotton factory” (Tyle). After leaving the cotton factory “Carnegie became a messenger boy for the Pittsburgh telegraph office and eventually made his way up to telegraph operator” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle “Thomas A. Scott, the superintendent of the western division of the Pennsylvania Railroad, made Carnegie his secretary at the age of eighteen.” Later, Carnegie took over Scott’s position of the railroad. Furthermore Carnegie “began to see that steel was going to replace iron and by 1873 he organized a steel rail company” (Tyle). According to Laura B. Tyle he continued to build his company when he “cut prices, drove out competitors,

As young as 33, Carnegie was pulling in an annual income of $50,000 a year, a huge amount at that time, and this was enough for him. Carnegie was a firm believer that anyone could make it to the top, and that it was the wealthys’ duty to help the poor work towards a more comfortable life. Carnegie said that “the man who dies rich, dies disgraced.” This is a greedy, unselfish philosophy that a robber baron could not conceive.

Being a man coming into America with nothing and climbing up to become one of the richest men in the world, he would eventually become the poster boy for every “Rag to Riches” story. Before he became the multi-million dollar tyrant we all know him as, his first job was a in a factory working as a bobbin boy. He received a measly dollar and twenty cents a week (Carnegie 34). It can be implied that this is why Carnegie was a firm believer in social darwinism and the concept of free enterprise, Carnegie believed that opportunity was there for anyone willing to seize it. He expressed these beliefs and demonstrated that they worked using his cutthroat business tactics and other unethical acts he committed to ensure dominance in the steel industry. Even in times of unrest and an almost stagnant

Finally, Carnegie should be considered a hero because of his philanthropy contributions and donations to society. Andrew Carnegie believed that the best way to spend your fortune was to devote it for the most beneficial results for the community by providing them what they could not do for themselves (Doc 8). Carnegie spent most of his life gaining immense amounts of money and becoming one of the richest men of the 19th century. Once he retired, he felt he needed to use his

Andrew Carnegie did amazing things with his money while and even after he was alive. He also had flaws and did some not so very good things. He used his fortune to do things like buying organs for churches, donating to colleges, and building public libraries. His Homestead steel mill, on the other hand experienced a strike and its workers were not very content, which Carnegie turned a blind eye to. So was Andrew Carnegie a hero?

When Carnegie decided to go into business for himself, he chose the steel industry, but his success came at the expense of his workers. He decided he should own the entire supply chain from iron mines and coal fields (to supply his raw materials) to ships and railroads (to deliver his products). He expanded rapidly; not

The general argument made by Robert L. Heilbroner in The Master of Steel: Andrew Carnegie is that Andrew Carnegie was a Captain of Industry. More specifically, Heilbroner argues that Andrew Carnegie was a benevolent industrialist who capitalized on opportunities to amass a fortune in which he would later donate towards the benefit of humanity. Andrew Carnegie grew up in a radical environment in Scotland where the arrest of his uncle shaped him into a Republican that despised privilege. Due to the Industrial Revolution and the establishment of steam mills, Carnegie’s family was forced to sell their looms and move to America in order to find new opportunities. Heilbroner points out that young Andrew Carnegie had a negative view on wealth

Andrew Carnegie A Hero or Not? Andrew Carnegie was a man who led the expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century. He was born in Dunfermline, Scotland in 1835. Carnegie was also known as one of the richest men in the world.

“A good reputation is more valuable than money. ”(Publilius Syrus) Andrew Carnegie did not seem very worried about his reputation among his workers! Andrew Carnegie’s managers and Andrew Carnegie himself had horrible connections and relations with his workers. His workers’ conditions were ineffective and unreasonable.

However, I do not believe that Carnegie is living up to what he is saying based on the article On Child Labour. The article describes how boys as young as five work all day in a little room separating slate from coal. The author describes the conditions as being deplorable with no heating during the winter and seats that are very dirty. He states that the boys start working at seven in the morning up until its dark while earning only $1 to $3 a week. Sometimes, at the end of the month, the money the boys use on transportation fees to work exceeds the amount that they earned, resulting in them working all month just to lose money

In order to understand Carnegie’s assumptions about the working class, one must first learn how he overcame his poor upbringing.

Dear editor, Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth can have some valid points about things. One quote Carnegie stated is “In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will become themselves” (61-62). He is explaining how if people were to help themselves, then that’s the biggest charity there is because you won’t end up becoming or remaining poor. This in my opinion is true since you have to work hard in life to succeed and it doesn’t come easy. A second point Carnegie made was “we accept and welcome… as conditions to which we must accommodate ourselves” (5-6). He is saying how we as people accept conditions to which we have to work hard for and maintain it and work with other people with that same mindset. I agree because

Among the people who viewed the rise of industrial America as great was Andrew Carnegie. In “Andrew Carnegie Hails the Triumph of America,” Carnegie lists ethnicity, equality, education, and the “superiority of the conditions under which [America] has developed” (2) as the causes that led to the rapid growth of America. Throughout his essay, Carnegie continuously praises the conditions of industrial America and looks forward to the wonderful future it holds. At no point in his writing does Carnegie take into consideration the hardships that the rise of industrial America could cast upon people; he merely viewed the positive aspects.

During the “Homestead Strike of 1892” video, it mentioned that Andrew Carnegie established a steel conglomerate that controlled all the elements needed for steel production. Thus, it resulted in the exploitation of labor for a higher profit in return. Why was Carnegie more concerned about the profits produced, than the conditions of his workers?

As a result of his actions, the workers started a battle that killed 11 people and wounded hundreds more. This bloodshed was in the name of worker’s rights and it was an unsuccessful attempt to have boss and worker equality. One a result of the strike, though, was that Carnegie and his manager Frick created the largest steel making enterprise in the world and subsequently provided thousands of citizens with employment leading to this country being a large economic power. If Carnegie had lost the strike, there would be no way for him to have created all that he did, as he would not have been able to make such a substantial profit from his mills. As a result of him making such a profit, the gap between the workers and bosses grew to reach new levels. The gap just kept growing, to the point where Carnegie was a billionaire and his workers were barely scraping by. The dream that America would be different, and that everyone would be equal vanished with the Homestead Strike, in its place became the knowledge that workers would always be subordinate to corporate and their wills and values would come second to those of their