The idea of whether Cortes was a hero or a villain has been pondered upon for many years and is a continuous argument that historians have. Cortes funded his own expedition and in 1519 Cortes left for the Americas although originally he didn’t exactly know where he was going. When he eventually landed, he was on American soil but he thought that it might just be a large island before he inevitably reached Asia, this was not to be. Cortes can be portrayed as a hero because he claimed the land for the betterment of Spain and he saved some of the Indian Tribes from the Aztecs. However, Cortes is seen as a villain because he destroyed an entire civilisation. Cortes can be portrayed as a hero because he claimed the land for the betterment
Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna was a cruel and determined leader. He wanted to control everything he could. Before he was elected the public favored him, but after his promises had been broken the public no longer viewed him the same way and looked down on him with hate. Santa Anna is an important historical figure because without the struggles he caused us, Texas might not have become a part of the United States of America.
Christopher Columbus A Hero or Villain? Was Christopher Columbus a hero or a villain? He was a villain he was horrible! Those innocent people did not deserve that. What was Columbus motive in finding a route to Asia through the Atlantic?
He sapient much of his later years seeking recognition for his achievements and support from the Spanish royal court. In 1547 Cortés died of pleurisy. Hernáns contributes defeating the Aztec Leader Moctezuma II and was a governor for Spain. if Hernán didn’t exist nobody would try to conquer the Aztecs and the Aztec would still be here and try to conquer more land and if someone were to take down Montezuma II they would have to stop the rebellions that took place. So if Hernan Cortes did not exist everything would be hard to try and map out Mexico and take down Montezuma II.Hernán Cortés contributed a lot to the people he made allies with some of the natives and took down the Aztec ruler Montezuma
PerceivJuan ponce de Leon discovers the present Florida. De Leon became a very rich person by finding gold and farming. Another thing is he sold things to sailors traveling to Spain. Overall De Leon was a good man aka he was a hero rather than a villain.
Columbus was a villain because he had raped women, mutilated bodies, and did lots of other horrible deeds. Document #6 explains that Columbus’ trip meant doom for the Natives because the population dwindled down significantly more or less because of him. This means that his ‘discovery’ was in fact lethal to the Native Americans. Therefore the fact the population had went down due to his visits proves Columbus was a villain.
Christopher Columbus was an Italian explorer who received credit for the discovery of the Americas in 1492. His goal was to discover another route to India instead, he sailed across the Atlantic Ocean and arrived in Hispaniola which is present day Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Although, historians argue he did not technically discover the Americas, he opened trade routes between the Old World and the New World. He influenced later explorers and impacted the development of the Columbian Exchange. The historians present their attitudes towards the consequences and outcomes of Christopher Columbus and his discovery. They also state their argument on his controversial legacy about whether Christopher Columbus should be perceived as a hero or a villain.
It’s been four months since the false prophet arrive at the shore. My people are weak from disease and my wife is dead. Why must I have to see my people suffer in vain? My lord, please answer me! Please make the suffering stop. For the love of everything that is holy, take my life but please let my people live. Because of my fault, my children are dead and your temple, the one that my ancestors built in your honor, is now destroyed. It is now covered in dirt and ashes and the blood of your village as if your name was not pure enough.
In 1492, Italian cartographer and explorer, Christopher Columbus, set off on a mission from Spain in order to find a quicker, alternative route to Asia. With him, Columbus brought eighty-seven men and three ships, the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa María, to sail across the large and vast Atlantic Ocean. Unfortunately for Columbus, a new route to Asia was never discovered by Spain that year because he had arrived in the Caribbean, which was found in North America. Thinking that he had just entered the Indies, he started to call the people of this land, “Indians”. These Indians were actually Native Americans who had lived on these lands for thousands of years prior. Immediately, letters from Columbus to the King and Queen of Spain were sent by boat back to Europe and soon Columbus was seen as the man who helped create a bridge of prosperous trading and riches between Europe and “Asia”.1 While this discovery proved that Columbus was a hero-like figure to Spain, it’s what he did within the new land that actually makes him one of the biggest villains to ever set foot on Earth. But what classifies this explorer as a villain? Columbus captured thousands of natives, many of which were sent back to Spain to live and work as slaves. Along with that, Columbus also forced the Christian religion onto them, spread diseases that killed thousands of lives, and used violence as a means of persuasion and control.2 Corrupted by his pursuit of riches,
Soldier and conqueror Bernal Díaz del Castillo in his book The True History of the Conquest of New Spain labeled Hernán Cortés “a valiant, energetic, and daring captain” and compared him to the likes of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, and Hannibal. Hernán Cortés was an ambitious conquistador and eventually defeated the mighty Mexican empire. A problem, however; emerges when distinguishing between the rational and romanticized versions of Cortés’ exploits. Bernal Díaz was present during the conquest, but his account was written much later and cannot be expected to be unbiased. Modern interpretations of Cortés can piece together all document and find that he stretched the truth to further his own gains. Cortés’ personality, goals, and actions have been interpreted differently since the days of the conquest, and have changed the way the conquest has been understood.
Cortés and Charles V were both religious which would be the reason why Cortés spent such amount of time explaining the Aztec religious practice in the following and why he took actions to Christianize the natives. From my perspective, Cortés began the letter with an objective tone. Firstly, he apologized for the time writing this letter because there were too many things he observed and encountered. He mentioned that the city of Temixtitlan had religious rights and customs, various wonderful objects, and how the sovereign governed the people and so on, which would appeal to the Emperor Charles V. Cortés wrote this letter with full of humility, instead of showing off how he conquered the city of Temixtitlan, he described the whole picture of
Hernan Cortes was a fierce conquistador from Spain that grew up in a noble family. In 1504, he headed out for Hispaniola but ended up in Cuba in 1511. Cortes convinced the Cuban governor to let him be the leader and general of an expedition to Mexico. He then established Veracruz, and was elected official General. Cortes scorched his ships. His men were skeptical about
- Cortes actions played a vital role in helping establish Spanish settlement in the new world. He and his fleet of about 600 men traveled into Mexico in hopes of finding gold as well as glory. During his time in Mexico he persuaded Indian societies who were rivals of the Aztec Empire, to join his force to take over this mighty empire. He used terror and intimidation to do so along the way. After a few years he took down the Aztec Empire, which opened the door for other explorers to invade the new world as well in their hopes of finding gold as well.
When you think of Columbus what comes to mind? A hero? A villain? Most people think he is a hero, but many do not think of the things he did to people such as slavery, beatings, raping, etc. He is most known for discovering America, but he only got to the Bahamas. Columbus was an Italian explorer that sailed the ocean blue in 1492. Columbus Day should not be celebrated because of the awful things that don’t make up for the discoveries that Christopher Columbus did.
Hearing of the word hero brings to my mind a good looking man with some qualities of fair, equal, courage, brave, honest and a positive leader. This makes the opposite a villain a person who wishes wrong for someone or a person who creates evil. The event changes dramatically, a hero of the past may not be considered a hero in the present and versa. Hernando Cortes a hero for joining two worlds and conquering the most powerful civilization of America or Hernando Cortes a villain for making the Aztec Empire disappear. Hernando Cortez was an important symbol for the explorations, but killing people, ending the most powerful civilization in America and spreading diseases does not makes him a hero. With
Hernando Cortes was one of the bravest military leaders of all time. Born in Medellin, Spain, he was a Spanish Conquistador who conquered most of Central America. He also gave Spain three-hundred years of control over Mexico. Cortes started exploring in the early 1500’s. He explored to find riches and conquered by being observant of the natives. With a small army, he conquered the Aztec Empire. Cortes went to the university in Salamanca, Spain. He attended the university to study Latin and Law. Unfortunately, Cortes completed only two years of school. He returned to his family in Medellin, Spain. However, life became boring for him. Nevertheless, Christopher Columbus inspired Cortes to explore the New World. Finally, Cortes was able to