Did you know that the Roman Empire was not always at its best? The empire had many different emperors. They were very strict but also very strange. Most of them enjoyed watching people get ripped apart by animals or people. Others enjoyed dancing, singing, and performing. The primary reasons for the “fall” of the Roman Empire were because of the lack of supplies and all the laziness developed.
One reason that the empire fell was because of the lack of supplies, like water, food, and even clothing. The lack of supplies was an issue because the goal had been reached. This was a cycle. Once the goal had been reached everyone slacked off. Once the villagers realized that they were running out of supplies they worked hard again. This issue
The theory of the weak Roman Emperors was one of the top three reasons for the fall of Rome because its vast empire fell due to the weak and unstable government that was established by the emperors who ruled during the fifty year period that lasted from 235 C.E. to 285 C.E. A powerful empire consisted of a long-lasting and strong government that was supported by a ruler who was present to rule over the people and had the will to carry out reforms to improve the lives of citizens. In Document A, the chart stated that twenty-two different emperors ruled Rome within the fifty year period. Based on this fact specified by the chart, there was an unstable government that ruled the Roman empire. Because of the weak government that was created, citizens
The Western Roman Empire fell due to many flaws. However, it fell mainly due to invasions from external enemies, economics, and a discouraged society. Therefore, the empire began to slowly decline. This expansive empire fell not due to one, but many faults made over a time period. To this day the empire is remembered as one of the most advanced of its time.
An additional cause for the fall of the Roman Empire was the constant change in emperors. The document says, “For the next forty-nine years , the Roman imperials throne was occupied by anyone military strength to seize it -- a total of twenty-two emperors.”(Doc 1, 3-5). In short this means that they would let anyone with military experience came to power. The effect of the decision is that the majority of the emperors either died in battle or was assassinated . The Empire didn’t have a stable leader which is why the Empire fell. They needed a leader that would stay in power for a long time to keep the Empire from breaking into chaos. This compares to the Han Dynasty because they also didn’t have stable emperors which caused the society
Although many historians and professors attribute the fall of the Roman Empire to excess and corruption, the role of shifting spheres of power, trade created a situation that made the fall of such a large cumbersome empire inevitable, the military played a role for not obeying protocol as well and an excess of things were happening in the government that also led to the fall of the Roman Empire. Each mistake made by the Romans contributed to their fall of their empire since after time of accumulation of their mistakes, it becomes a tremendous problem. Though the Roman Empire still did have their climax in history before everything came crashing down.
Rome was, in its more wholesome years, a prosperous city-turned-empire with many brave hearts fighting to expand it. Rome started out as a small and humble town around 750 BC, and, a few years later, took advantage of this weakness and obscureness and put its amount of hard-workers to use. They took over Greece and many others, also creating one of the most powerful and humongous armies to behold the Mediterranean World. Everywhere from Scotland to Egypt to Asia Minor to Spain, there were Romans. Though, why, in 5th century AD, did it fall?
The great Romans fell to the hands of the Huns. Rome was a worldwide phenomenon, ready to destroy anything in their territory. The Roman Empire fell because of inside corruption along with, a weak military being attacked by multiple outside groups. They fell because of a lack of dedication to keep the Empire going.
For example, there was unemployment throughout the empire. It was expensive for farmers who paid workmen to produce goods. Many of these farmers could not compete and lost or sold their farms, which left them without any jobs. Another reason the Roman economy suffered was because of inflation, which was the increase in prices. Flow of gold into the economy decreased, yet much gold was being spent to pay for
By 200 BC, Rome was quickly becoming one of the world’s greatest empires with their excellent military conquering territory from modern day Scotland to Spain. After the Punic Wars and the defeat of Carthage, Rome had full control of the Mediterranean region, establishing colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Julius Caesar became Rome’s first emperor using his military influence. Under his reign, Rome shifted from a republic to an empire under the rule of an emperor and the military. Rome steadily increased in stability, power, and wealth, reaching Pax Romana (the time of Roman peace) under Emperor Augustus Caesar. Rome was forced to discover, as many other
Two major factors in the Roman Empire’s downfall were the misfortunate events of disasters and diseases. A massive earthquake struck the Roman Empire, thus starting the chaos that would lead to the waters both receding and then coming back in a massive flood. Edward Gibbon wrote in the book
Ultimately, I think the fall of Rome was more internal than external because although it is argued that external forces like Barbarians were the ones who sacked Rome in 476 A.D. these Barbarians were able to do this because of mismanagement in the whole framework of Rome. For example, emperors like Diocletian and Constantine hired foreign mercenaries to prop up their armies. The once feared legions of Rome were eventually predisposed with Barbarians such as the Goths. While these Germanic soldiers proved to be formidable warriors, they also had no loyalty to the empire, and their power-hungry officers often turned against their Roman employers. In fact, many of the Barbarians who sacked the city of Rome and brought down the Western Empire had earned their military stripes while serving in the Roman legions, hence why I argue that internal decisions like hiring Barbarians and mistreating the Visigoths within their own territory helped Rome succumb to its downfall.
The Roman Empire was a massive empire that eventually collapsed over time. In 455 C.E the Roman Empire was its last straw. Rome's transition from a republic to an empire made it increase dramatically. This, of course, led to many other problems that caused the Roman Empire to decline and fall. The Roman empire did not depend on one thing for its decline but three major events. The Roman empire fell because of the rise of Christianity, economic trouble, and weak military.
To begin with, one reason why the Roman Empire fell was due to their military weakness. They got weak by when they abandoned parade ground drills. They also got weak and lazy when they thought that their armor started getting heavy, therefore they did not want to wear it. According to Vegetius, the roman historian, they did not wear their armor so they were exposed to wounds, in which they wanted to run and not fight/battle, for the roman empire. Once the military
In AD 476 the whole of the Roman Empire had declined, the Romans had been overthrown by the Goth Leader, Odoacer who became the King and ruler of Italy. He officially deposed the last reigning Roman Empire. There are many different reasons for why the Empire collapsed (the 4 factors, Barbarians, Christianity, Nature and the Romans.) However, we have no substantiation to prove that any of these factors actually weakened and destroyed the Empire but, I think the main reason for the fall of the Roman Empire was Christianity because the Christians built many Churches. For example, St. Peter’s Church in Rome. This used up valuable cash which was needed for the defences and fortifications to help defend the Empire. I believe that if this valuable
While the fall of the Roman Empire is well known, the exact causes of why it fell can be difficult to pinpoint. Many historians believe that Rome 's downfall was due to poor leadership, weakened economics, or perhaps a combination of the two along with other seemingly unrelated factors. However, there is a string of evidence suggesting that there were three main components that took place to bring about the fall of the Roman Empire. These determinant attributes did not happen all at once, and there was a domino effect with each one directly influencing the others. The fall of Rome occurred after a series of preventable events, including unacceptable emperors, the heavy reliance on slaves, and the increasingly uncontrollable borders of Rome.
The Roman Empire was a glorious civilization that lasted for a long period of time, and was two million square miles in size. It is mostly known because of how big and strong it was, but the Roman Empire could have held that title for a longer period of time. There were several entities that can be held responsible for the fall of Rome, such as Emperor Diocletian, the government and ethnic groups that were new to the empire. Unfortunately the extremely famous, big and strong empire started to fall gradually between 190 A.D. 410 A.D. due to three causes. The causes for the fall of the Roman Empire were the empire’s sheer size, racial weakening, and splitting of the empire into two.