The Reign of Terror was full of deaths, wars and invading for what? Power? Is that all they wanted, is that all it took for someone to look bigger and more powerful. The real question is was the Reign of Terror Justified? I believe the reign of terror was not justified for these three reasons: Their were unnecessary killings, human rights were violated and not acknowledged in the situation, and no good came out of the reign of terror. in 1789 the french revolution began and in 1794 everything ended. At the beginning the poor people were starving and the bread prices would go up because bad weather had devastated the grain harvest. here were unfair tax systems, louis to his credit sought the advice of nobles, church officials and even commoners but the problems just grew and grew. On August 26 the new revolutionary government had signed a new document called the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen which also ensured the liberty, equality and fraternity, For the people of france. …show more content…
Their holidays were taken considering a campaign was launched against the catholic church. their sunday worship, christmas, and easter was abolished (as seen in Doc C). In order for anyone to be a citizen they had to finish wars of liberty against tyranny, safely cross through storms and become republicans (as seen in Doc G). Their religious believe we're stripped from them people fiercely fought against the military draft called the Levée en Masse and against laws that tried abolishing christianity in france (seen in Doc
There was no justice to these acts of terror in France. During this time period the 3rd estate was 98% of the population, 1.5% was the 2nd and .5% was the 1st estate. The 3rd estate was the peasants who had to pay 100% of the taxes in this time period and by the poor being taxed and France spending a lot of their money on random stuff and junk. They were in debt because of this. The Reign of Terror was unjustified because of the discrimination and violence to the non-republics and peasants. (Doc G.) The government also played a big factor in the unfair justice to the peasants and non-republics by making the peasants pay all the taxes and not giving them any say in government. (Doc A.)
The Reign of Terror, was it justified? A wife beheaded, a revolution , and thirty-five to forty thousand people killed in the countryside alone. It was all happening in France, starting in the year 1789. A man named Maximilien Robespierre and his countrymen have decided that they dislike the current government system and overthrow it. They are successful and try to turn it to democracy, but in order to keep the power they end up having to execute nearly all government officials. Later, the counter revolutionists throw them over, so was Robespierre justified? The reign of terror was not justified because of the way the government treated their people, How they restricted the citizens rights, and finally how they treated their “criminals”.
The Reign of Terror seemed to be the only thing that could help achieve some sort of equality between the Three Estates. Before the Reign of Terror, the Third Estate was the most financially unstable out of all three estates. Despite this, they were the only one burdened with the mandatory payment of taxes. Due to Louis XVI’s constant spending and a horrible drought, food prices rose and the entire country was deep in debt, with the Third Estate struggling more and more at every occasion he carelessly gave out currency. With no other options, people decided to take up arms against the Revolution. Every riot or problem that revolutionaries caused was most likely justified in some way because their needs were never accounted for. The Reign of Terror was justified.
It all started on September 5th, 1793 after the committee of Public safety was created to fight “enemies of the revolution”. Others who disagreed countered the revolution creating a revolt. Because of this the committee of public safety began killing others who disagreed with their government in the form of guillotine. The Reign of Terror was not justified because innocent people died, the revolutionists were hypocritical, and overall it was unnecessary.
The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt to form a new government in France.For quite a long time absolute rulers had ruled the French country with little thought for most of the people.The execution of Louis XVI offered path to a year-long stretch of the French Revolution known as "The Reign of Terror". An excess of 20,000 French individuals were executed with the guide of the guillotine.The new government continued to execute substantial quantities of people whom it thought to be enemies of the revolution. The reign of terror was not justified because it went against the rights of man and it cost a lot of people their lives.
The period of the French Revolution was from September 5, 1793, to July 27, 1794. Louis XVI was sentence to death due to crime like unfair tax system and having France be bankrupt. In a 10 month period which suspect enemies in the revolution were guillotined even innocents. Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified because they were threatened, methods that aren't that necessary, and no evidence of how they
The three words of the french Revolution were liberty, equality, and fraternity. was the Reign of Terror Justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of human rights, internal threats, and external threats.
The Reign of Terror was a time period in the the 18th century when thousands and thousands of innocent people were killed for no apparent reason. In 1789 the French Revolution started because of the mass amount of people upset by France's monarchs. The king at the time, King Louis XVI, wasn’t doing a great job as the nation’s leader. France was in huge debt and King Louis was doing anything to fix the problem. As France became more and more in debt, the price of food was skyrocketing. The people of France started revolting which ultimately led to a new document being made allowing half of the male population to vote, and reducing power of the nobles and catholic church while also giving more power to the common people. A man by the name of Maximilien Robespierre wasn't happy about the new reform so he decided to help out during the revolution. Along with Robespierre, Austria and Prussia helped fight the war on France. Historians
The French Revolution is arguably the bloodiest period in French history, with men such as Maximilien Robespierre leading the country into a situation of state sponsored terror. Originally being quite a liberal thinker inspired by the works of Rousseau, Robespierre quickly gained a reputation for being a radical throughout the course of the Revolution, especially during the Terror. Early on terror was justified as a means to root out foreign and domestic enemies of the Revolution, however; once the foreign threat had been taken care of it became increasingly difficult for Robespierre to rationalize his use of terror to bring about a supposed Republic of Virtue. In his speech, the “Justification of the use of Terror” which he presented to
The French Revolution is known as a model revolution for modern ideals and an example of the people’s power. The French Revolution had many stages that were influential in the outcome and lives of the Republic. The Reign of Terror was a year-long period that reflected the changing views of government and the means to do so. The Reign of Terror was unjustifiable as the wars in and out of France created more devastation, the rights established by the representative government were contradicted by the government itself, and fear was spread.
The ‘Reign of Terror’ also called ‘The Terror’ was the main part of the French revolution as it was made to fight the enemies of the revolution and to prevent counter-revolution from happening. France was surrounded by armies from on all sides and so the revolutionary government decided to make ‘Terror.’ The ‘Terror’ was when hard measures were taken out on anyone suspected as an enemy of the revolution, during a 10-month period.
Everyone deserves protection, whether it’s a commoner or a Nobel. After all, should it not be that everyone is created equally? Should everyone have liberty and freedom? During 1793 and 1794, no one was really sure if the conditions in France were serious enough to require such a violent response by the revolutionary government. The Reign of Terror was not justified by any means, the whole process was too extreme since all the people were only fighting for their rights. Rights such as: Liberty, equality, and fraternity. In addition, the external threat did not require the terror, the internal threat and the people inside France did not deserve terror and fear of everything and everyone around them. Finally, the government responses were truly
(Doc F) As all hell broke loose within France it was the cause of the Reign of Terror which overall, was not justified.
King Louis XVI and Marie Antionette were two people that should not have been ruling a country. King Louis was always gone on hunting trips and Marie Antionette spent every dime of French money. Once the Monarchy ran out money, they started to tax the Third, and poorest, estate. The third estate took up 97% of the population. 97% of the population was starving and the royal family kept spending large amounts of money until the people revolted. The people of France tried to reason with King Louis, but he refused to change his ways and kept taxing the third estate. When the people revolted, they stormed the Bastille and took all of the weapons they could. The people then went to the King’s palace and demanded he fix the way he was ruling before they killed him. The King didn’t listen and was executed along with his wife. Of the three kids that Marie Antionette had, the two boys died of Tuberculosis in jail and the daughter was sent to live the remainder of her life in exile in Austria. It may seem as though the people of France had successfully overgrown their monarchy and could begin a life of freedom, however this is not the case. The French had rushed into combat too fast and did not have a plan for what to do after they had killed their rulers. The right of Terror begins where Maximilian Robespierre beheads 40,000 people in the span of ten months for speaking against the revolution. In the end, Robespierre ends up getting
The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt, by the revolutionaries, to form a new government that would give the people more liberty, equality and value people’s rights. Between 1793 and 1794 the government used extreme ways to achieve their goals. This period of time, led by Robespierre, was called the reign of Terror because between 20,000-40,000 french people were killed by the government forces. The Reign of Terror was not justified for three reasons:The external and internal threat did not deserve it, they denied natural rights against people who opposed them and the methods of the Terror were too extreme.