Washington State Government Policy Case Study

Although with all this information on the benefits of treating public water there is still information that is overlooked by governments. Fluoride is a pollutant, insecticide, poison, and a byproduct of fertilizer, nuclear power plants, and metal processing. Fluoride is also found in many processed goods, dental hygiene products, and pharmaceuticals meaning the average person’s intake is most likely far greater than the recommended levels. In the 1930s they were looking for an easy way to dispose of the toxic byproduct. During this time period one of the largest aluminum companies funded a test to determine how bad or good fluoride actually was to the people, this is when it was first deemed as a beneficial treatment. To me it seems kind of fishy that a company more worried about public relations and how to dispose of the toxic byproduct was trusted to carry out the testing themselves. This thinking came from the era where it was thought that smoking cigarettes would

However, they need encountered resistance, typically from the residents they're making an attempt to help, who believe that if their water is legal it should be safe. Drinking water that doesn't meet a federal health guideline won't essentially make somebody sick. several contaminants are dangerous as long as consumed for years. and a few researchers argue that even harmful chemicals, once consumed at very low doses over long periods, cause few risks. Others argue that the price of removing minute concentrations of chemicals from water doesn't equal the advantages. “Communities where the drinking water has contained chemicals that are associated with health risks include Scottsdale, Ariz.; El Paso, Tex., and Reno, Nev. Test results analyzed by The Times show their drinking water has contained arsenic at concentrations that have been associated with cancer. But that contamination did not violate the Safe Drinking Water Act” (NY Times 2009).

Fluoridation of group drinking water is a main consideration in charge of the decrease in dental caries (tooth rot) . The historical backdrop of water fluoridation is a great case of clinical perception prompting epidemiologic examination and group based general wellbeing intercession. Albeit other fluoride-containing items are accessible, water fluoridation remains the most fair and practical strategy for conveying fluoride to all individuals from most groups, paying little respect to age, instructive achievement, or wage level.

Water is one of life’s most precious resources. Without it, life as we know it would cease to exist. Almost all life is dependent on water for survival. Humanity uses water in almost everything they do in their daily lives, whether that be for consumption or production. However water itself is not enough to sufice, clean water is required for life to thrive. Dirty untreated water can be the cause for death as well, so it is integral that water be kept clean. The government has enacted laws to ensure that our water is maintained and kept clean. These laws cover industries, plumbing, and sanitation among other things. Unfortunately, the city government in Flint Michigan willfully failed to provide safe water for its citizens.

The Midwestern region of the United States, such a small corner of the world, is notorious for its prosperous agriculture and its abundant livestock population. Citizens of the Midwest, and consequently, the United States, rarely have to worry about where meals will come from or when the next time water will be available. Water fountains are a common sight within public places, specifically schools and workplaces, and each system reliably produces water at the touch of a button, every time, without fail. However, what happens when the dependability of water in the Midwest is compromised? Over the past decade, the water quality in Flint, Michigan, a town very close to Iowan homes, has seen a rapid decadence, given that the Flint River has been exposed to “the presence of fecal coliform bacteria, low dissolved oxygen, plant nutrients, oils, and other toxic substances,” though the main focus has

I am writing to you on behalf of my support of House Bill 129. This bill would allow water authorities to propose a referendum for the cessation of fluoridation of county water supply. As a citizen of district 3 and of a fluoridated county, I would greatly appreciate the ability to vote for whether or not I would like to consume water with fluoride in it. I believe that a choice in the matter would greatly benefit every county and its citizens. Since we are the ones consuming the water, I think it should be a community decision instead of a decision made by local, state, or federal governments. After all, this is supposedly a nation of “we

The quality of water however falls solely on humans, who are the number one hazards to the precious water we have become so addicted to. The obligation for safe, clean, drinkable water is an individual responsible; if you die or fall victim to dehydration the blame falls on the suffering individuals. That being written, no person should have the right to revoke water from anyone. If an organization has taken it upon themselves to treat, facilitate, and distribute water in return for some compensation then any persons may purchase this service so long as the required payments are being

An article published in the Oregonian, “Portland and its aversion to fluoride reflects Oregon’s unusual politics”, presented views of Portlanders who have rejected adding fluoridation chemical to the city’s clean water supply.1 In September 2012 Portland city council approved adding fluorine to the city’s water supply.1 However, public outrage soon ensued leading to a special election to protect the water supply.1 In May 2013, Portlanders voted 61% to protect their clean water supply.1

These cleanups are required by federal and state laws passed in the last two decades mostly in response to public concern that drinking contaminated ground water may cause cancer or other illnesses. The laws require that, in most instances, the contaminated ground water be restored to a condition that meets state and federal drinking water standards. Businesses and government agencies paying for the cleanups are calling for reconsideration of whether returning all contaminated ground water to drinking water standards is a realistic goal. At the same time, public interest groups are advocating maximum protection of the public's right to a safe water supply in places where there is

This policy will not only reduce the amount of water intake as a whole but will also cause more efficient water management practices. When users have a limited water supply, they will be forced to adapt. A portion of these changes may come in the form of using native plants in landscaping as well as growing crops that are more suitable to Florida’s climate. This will significantly reduce the amount of water necessary to grow these types of vegetation and has already been adopted in Phoenix, AZ and more recently the state of California. While Florida is not yet in a crisis due to lack of water, as California or Arizona are, I believe this policy is necessary in the prevention of such a

“Most communities have clean water,” says Alex Beauchamp of Food and Water Watch, a national organization dedicated to keeping “clean, affordable, public tap water flowing freely to our homes.”(page #) Beauchamp’s organization believes water is a public commodity, not a private one, and shouldn’t be privatized.(page #)

The US government will respond to the overwhelming number of families and individuals in need of aid by creating a welfare program that would give assistance to those who had less or no income. The courts hold social security accountable because the federal has the power to spend on general welfare. The president trying to pass a law to move people from welfare to work and slashed the rolls by eighty percent, and Legislators maintain the process by which legislative actions and policy changes at the Federal level impact State and Tribal child welfare systems and service delivery.

The role of the United States government has increased to detrimental levels over the last century. Our nation is currently over 18 trillion dollars in debt and this number continues to grow everyday. Social programs are leading our nation’s people under a constraining weight of debt and forced dependency on the government. Our government needs to refocus on serving the people instead of enslaving them.

The media coverage of the news is an informative way American citizens can stay well versed when it comes to what is happening in our country and the world. To gain this type of knowledge people can simply turn on the television to the local news station, pick up a newspaper, or become in tuned electronically through the Internet or cell phone applications. The options for gaining information of what is occurring in the world are at our fingertips. When it comes to news media coverage there seems to be more portrayal of national or local news rather than state government topics. The state government is not as prominent as the national or local level governments in the media because, of its middle role in the federal system, which often conceals the state’s responsibility when it comes to policy decisions (Gormley, 1978, p. 354). The lack of news popularity for state governments can be explained through the reasons why they are not gaining as much media coverage and how state’s issues can influence the lives of citizens.

Transition: At the time, fluoridating the drinking water may have seemed like a new and revolutionary program that would protect America 's teeth, but many doctors and scientists have become skeptical of fluoride’s true effectiveness and overall safety.