preview

Wasserstrom Sexism Analysis

Decent Essays

In my opinion, Wasserstrom makes multiple valid points. To me, his most compelling claim was about how sex roles only exist because people impose them on specific sexes. However, it is evident to note that the word “sex” is a slightly outdated and broad term for modern ideas surrounding sexism. The modern terminology for Wasserstrom’s ideas against sexism are “gender roles” instead of “sex roles.” Sex is now considered, although constantly misused, to solely depend on biological properties such as genitalia. The new, revised (unofficial) gender, which depends on personal opinion based on emotions, is equivalent in principal to Wasserstrom’s point of sex roles being subjective. Nevertheless, it is important to maintain awareness of sex, but “gender” is the modern, more applicable term. …show more content…

With the debate over gender roles comes an ideal, in respects to how gender should be view, gender fluidity. Rather than limiting people to decide between two “radically” different genders, man or woman, gender fluidity intends to give people the chance to meet in the whatever percentage of man or woman they desire to be identified as. In essence, gender can be viewed as a spectrum, which a person can fluctuate within. Gender can be influenced by external factors Gender fluidity supporters also call into question the reasoning behind society’s coercion of specific gender roles. Taking into account all these traits, I believe that I am not wrong in claiming the gender fluidity supporters as people that strive for the assimilationist ideal type of society. Perhaps this “ideal” society, filled with assimilationists, could occur thanks to the gender fluidity community. However the idea gender fluidity is highly fallible and supports my belief that the assimilationists ideal is

Get Access