Officials, should be able to search private information or devices to protect community’s. Officials shouldn’t be able to go through devices or private information. Protection of a community is more important than your device privacy.
If we want proper community safety, then some of privacy will have to be sacrificed. For example, students cyberbullying other students and acting inappropriate is not right, so the school wants to keep students out of legal trouble. “If a school catches a student bullying someone online before the police do, the student is less likely to end up in legal trouble.” says Joseph Maneen from “Watch What You Type”. No parent wants to have to deal with court because of their child, so, the school can keep them
Confidentially is a very important factor generally in schools. If a child is under child protection failing to ask for their parents’ permission to take pictures could lead to a serious issue. The school needs to ensure that cyber bullying is not tolerated. Children need to be educated about exactly what it is and what to do if it occurs. Perhaps an assembly could be performed across the whole school so the children are
I disagree with Lauren Slater’s theory that throughout a person's life, one will only surround themselves with ideas and people similar to their own because, it is easy to see that people enjoy controversy and over the course of our lives, our beliefs and ideas can change.
The Government should not be able to look through people’s personal information because it goes against the fourth amendment. An example of this is, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (constituteproject web). The constitution states it is not right for
“... helped a student who was talking on social media about ‘ending his life’ … ‘It’s just another avenue to open up a dialogue with parents about safety’” (Wallace). Monitor students really helpful sometimes, it help stopped these things before it actually happen, people are going to be sorry from now on if they don’t allow schools to watch over the students that really need to be watch. “Federal appeals court backed school officials in suspension of a high school student… threatened his classmates with violence on Myspace…” (Wallace). Just focus on the students who are being bullied to the point where they want to commit suicide is not enough, they also have to focus on the bullies that make everything happen. If schools don’t watch the bullies they just going to find another victim to bully now that the other victim is on the school’s watch. In my opinion, the author, Kelly Wallace, is right about permitting schools to monitor student’s posts off-campus because there could be less bullies since nobody would dare to bully another person ever again. Plus it will prevent victims from committing
It cannot be disputed that schools often have to place the privacy of one student, below the overall need to secure the safety of a student body as a whole. If students know that their belongings can be searched, it will discourage them from committing illegal activities at school.
Ever since the first school shooting, a lot of people have changed their beliefs on this subject. I was in eighth grade when the shooting at Columbine High School took place. Before that shooting, I never would have considered something like that happening. Now, it is seventeen years later and school shootings almost seem like an everyday thing. That is sad, but it is true. This is why I believe a student should not have a high expectation of privacy while at school. The law used to be more lenient, but these circumstances have changed that. Right after Columbine, a lot of states had a zero tolerance law. According to the Center for Public Education site, this law said that if a student was caught with contraband they were given a strict punishment, no matter what the circumstance was. The laws have changed some over the last few years, and are not quite as strict as that. The schools still have to ensure that every student is safe, though. It is common for schools to have metal detectors or bring in dogs on a regular basis. Once they have a reason to suspect a student, they have the right to search their belongings. I believe this is well within their rights as administrators who are trying to protect the school as a whole. I realize that students may feel violated, I have been there. It was always an inconvenience to have to sit outside the hallways while the dogs searched each room. I never felt like it was wrong when they did find something though. So many students would bring large amounts of drugs, guns and knives to school. If it weren’t for the measures that the school took they would just be walking around with these items. I hope these laws never change, and my kids have the same protection that I did. I would hate to imagine my child going to school with guns and drugs within an arm’s reach. I believe the issue of student’s privacy is one that many people can agree with each other on.
This can result in severe consequences for both the students and the school. Colleges such as Harvard have been denying the entrance of students due to inappropriate and explicit content posted on social media. Many high schools have begun hiring outside companies to monitor their student’s posts. The question arises: By doing so, are they violating these students First Amendment Rights? Approximately 92 percent of teenagers say they use their electronic devices daily (Ray Bendici, “Schools Step up Social Media Monitoringâ€). Twenty-four percent of which say they constantly use the internet. Although schools have a good intention for monitoring student’s accounts; to stop bullying, to find racist and explicit content, and to stop any threats; some schools go so far that they are violating both their student's privacy and First Amendment
Schools are having to update their code of conduct because of new circumstances that the schools face. Schools have to consider every aspect, otherwise the schools may find themselves being sued by the student’s parents. Bullying and harassment has increased throughout the years. Not only that, but it has become more severe. Teenagers have committed suicide because of this. There used to only be bullying face-to-face. However, because of technology and social media, bullies are now able to bully and harass others without having to be next to the person. Schools used to not have any control of what happened to students outside of school, but because of many furious parents suing schools for not doing anything, these schools have to consider
I think that students’ expectations of privacy while in school are guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states that people have the right to be secure in their persons, property, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (Siegel & Welsh, 2014). The schools must create and maintain a safe environment for students to learn. I feel that as long as the school provides safety and education then their policies should reflect. If searching the students’ property before they enter school grounds is necessary to ensure safety that is a reasonable search. Reasonable searches must be fair and impartial to all students no matter their race, ethnicity or gender. An example of an unreasonable search would be if
As a student at a public high school, it is scary knowing that at any time something wrong could happen. Schools have some safety precautions, for example code red drills and having a locked door before anyone can actually get into the school. But recent events have shown that schools are definitely not the safest place considering 17 people were killed at a high school in Florida on Valentine’s Day. The government can ensure that it will never happen again if they make a few changes. If there are new and improved gun laws, then everywhere will feel safer and people will be less afraid.
Because of this, citizens are forced to choose between new technology and keeping personal information private. The many appeals and cases brought to court surrounding this issue center around the U.S. Constitution, more specifically, the fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment states, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issued” (Constitution). Whether a search is considered reasonable in the eyes of the law is determined by looking at and balancing two interests. On the side of the citizens, the determination is based off of an intrusion on a person’s fourth amendment
Should authorities search people’s phones and posts? Authorities should not be able to search through private posts and information or authorities should be able to view posts and information.
In today's school system, there have been uproars about the student's privacy and safety at the schoolhouse. Some parents feel that their child's safety is more important because of the rules that the school has set forth to maintain a safe environment. Others feel that their child's privacy should be taken seriously because they should be treated more like an adult. In recent news, there has been concerns about the student's safety that cause some to get injured or killed; while, student's privacy has cause the police to get involved. The school system should be concerned as well as, aware about the student’s privacy and safety at their prospective school.
Schools need to maintain a disciplined and safe learning environment. There are many disciplinary actions that are in use today and although some can disagree about the amount of discipline that is best for maturing children, it is reasonable to be in agreement that a positive learning environment begins with physical and emotional safety. School safety includes a broad range of matters, including, fighting, bullying, drugs, alcohol, weapons, and etc. Many schools use varying methods in an effort to maintain school safety. Some schools limit school access and require all visitors to sign in. Physical surveillance is another common method of addressing school safety issues along with use of staff and student identification. Among all these
The line between public safety and the continuation of a high standard of privacy for all is a razor thin line; the United States government itself straddles it every day. Such is one very serious complication that the administrators and security forces of Coppell High School face: it is in the best interest of the administrators to prevent drug usage in the school as to stop the spread of any conflict (namely any characteristically delinquent behaviors such as interpersonal violence and school dropout) that they could potentially cause. However, it is also imperative to maintain some level of privacy so that students do not lash out against the administrators and school-wide morale remains fairly high. Numerous students and other relevant