Watson And Franklin Gender Roles

The discovery of deoxyribonucleic acid, more commonly known as DNA, has been the foundation for much scientific work. This fundamental discovery was credited to James Watson and Francis Crick. Many people believe that another person, Rosalind Franklin, also played a large role in the research. How much did she contribute to the discovery? Why is her name left unrecognized? This paper will discuss her part in the search and whether her name should appear next to Watson's and Crick's as the co-discoverer of DNA.

I believe that Rosalind Franklin deserved more credit than she got foe her X-ray crystallography. Watson took photo 51 from her file without ther knowledge which showed that DNA has a definite pattern and two strands. Watson and Crick used the photo for their own personal gain instead of giving Rosalind any credit they saw Rosalind as below them so they had no issue stealing her idea.

1. What role did Rosalyn Franklin play in our understanding of DNA’s structure? She discovered the double-helix position of the DNA.

Over the course of the modern age, the human body was still a mystery waiting to be solved. The body contains secrets one can only hope to discover. Over the twentieth century, scientists tried to understand one of the most complex concepts in the biological field. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) was at the forefront of research. Several theories claimed to have solved the structural concept of DNA. However, it was not until Francis Crick and James D. Watson discovered the true structure, the double helix. However, many potential models of DNA had passed through the biology field until eventual lose of credibility. The past models would contain a fixed detail that would make the entire concept invalid. In James D. Watson book, The Double Helix, he illustrates his path amid incorrect theories until he reaches the model that is taught around the world today.

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE 1. China's one-child policy: A critical measure or a violation of human rights? This policy, created in 1980 by China's President Xai Ping, made it so every family in China can only produce one child. Some argue that the policy wasn't necessary and violated the Chinese people's lives, but I believe it was needed in order to make China a better nation. The one-policy helped improve the environment, economy, and education in China.

When examining the 1980s film Puberty Blues, using techniques of content analysis and personal reflection, I have observed certain differences and similarities between the culture depicted in the film and my own society and culture. The subject of the film is the journey that two young people go on as they transition from adolescence into adulthood, I will be outlining what exactly that means.

Rosalind Franklin helped develop the double-stranded helix structure of DNA, which she is rarely given credit for; while Jane Goodall extensively studied the behavior of apes. Both of these women have been audacious not only for doing great things for science, but also for pushing against the norm of only men being able to make discoveries. Being adventurous propels people into seeking new ideas and finding solutions, fixing thought to be unsolvable

Also he helped with mapping cancer to help people or warn others, so they will be able to find if they have it. James helped out everyone on this planet and those who are sick or are sick but don’t know it. To be recognized in the scientific community you have to do something amazing. Crick and James Watson's first look toward taking in the structure of DNA missed the goal, but their second look took place in the spring 1953 and brought about the match of the ladder helical look. Which takes after a stepping stool. Their model added how the DNA particle could copy itself. Watson and Crick had looked the work of English scientist Rosalind Franklin, a partner of Maurice Wilkins' at King's College London, to land at their noteworthy disclosure, notwithstanding, her commitment to their discoveries would go generally unrecognized until after her she died. Franklin had made a few unpublished working papers talking about the basic characteristics of DNA, and with her understudy Raymond Gosling had taken a X-ray diffraction picture of DNA, known as Photo 51, which would get to be urgent proof in recognizing the structure of

After watching the film, I realized the importance of collaboration in a team. Because neither Franklin nor Wilkins wanted to give up their ideas and processes in finding the DNA structure, good ideas from either side cannot reach the other person. On the other hand, although Watson and Crick failed a lot of times and even got banned from conducting their research, they worked together as a team and were selfless about their findings. Therefore, if Franklin and Wilkins worked together in the beginning there might be a possibility that they would discover the DNA structure

“Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated”; this seemingly simple statement is found in a letter written by Rosalind Franklin to her father. Over seventy years after this declaration was made, an abundance of people have proven its truth and unknowingly use this statement to influence their education and life. Although Rosalind Franklin underwent various trials throughout her life, generational research can attend that her persistence made her into the brilliant chemist that is still remembered today. Rosalind Franklin’s most recognized piece of work is her important contributions in understanding the structure of DNA, a remarkable discovery considering her unexpectedly short lifespan. When looking at the impact Franklin

Rosalind headed back home to England in 1950. A physicist, John Randall of King's College, invited Rosalind into his research group. He told her that her sole project would be to "investigate the structure of certain biological fibres," meaning DNA. This is where a man named Maurice Wilkins first entered the picture. He was also a research associate in this group and played a controversial role later in Rosalind's life (McGrayne, 1993).

When James Watson and Francis Crick explained their DNA molecule to Wilkins and Franklin, they both knew something was wrong. Watson had tried to remember what Franklin had said in one of her lectures on the DNA molecule, but he was going off just his memory so most of it was wrong. Linus Pauling was on his own race against time to try and beat Franklin and Wilkins, they had been waiting to see what Pauling had come up with, but as they read his report they knew it was wrong. Franklin was a very “careful scientist,” she wanted to look at more photos before she shared what she had found. What Franklin didn’t know was in the spring of 1953, Wilkins had shown Watson one of her best x-ray photos. Watson had asked if they could start to work on

Before the publication of Maddox's book, two contradictory sources mainly informed Franklin's personal character and her contribution to the DNA discovery. Watson's 1968 The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, and Anne Sayre's 1975 Rosalind Franklin and DNA. In Watson’s book, Rosalind Franklin is known only as the bossy, and unfeminine Rosy. “Rosy” is a cartoonish which ready to “strike men in her red hot

After reading “Streetcar Named Desire” by Tenessee Williams, I decided to write a book review geared towards adult readers. Through this review I wanted to show my understandings of the play, and stating how intrigued it kept me. Book review is the ideal type of text where the author is able to express freely his opinion about the play. People that are looking for recommendations often read book reviews about it. My aim was to highlight the reason why this play is a masterpiece and inquire the author’s writing style. The battle between genres was constant throughout the play, and made the reader empathize with certain characters depending on your own sex. The ending of the novel is all about brutal and tragic irony. I was continually desiring

Rosalind Franklin’s work on DNA was crucial in discovering the composition of the human body as a whole. Her x-ray photo revealed a double helix structure and she also discovered the A and B form of DNA. She worked through the adversity of being a female in a predominately male dominated realm and made remarkable findings that were eventually stolen. She adapted to a new lab with antiquated technology. Before this discovery, the structure of DNA was thought to be simple. Scientist, Watson and Crick, started with the wrong structure of DNA from a misinterpretation of notes from one of Franklin’s presentations. Unlike Watson and Crick, Rosalind Franklin could explain DNA and how it worked.