Ways the executive branch of the U.S. goverment, through various laws and acts, gained power over the legislative and judicial brances.

The U.S. President has a veto right over any bill approved by Congress. This practically means that "if the president doesn't like a bill, he or she vetoes it" (Kowalski 2012: 22). Even with this, his authority can be challenged if two-thirds of the senators and House of Representatives vote accordingly. The Congress also has the ability to limit the president's actions as a result of the fact that it has power over the finances. Similarly, each body in Congress can check the other, considering that all proposals have to be issued

Let’s start with the president’s ability to veto. The president can veto or send a bill back to congress. Congress can however override the president’s Veto with two thirds vote. There are also some special circumstances the apply to this. If the president gets a bill and dose nothing with it for 10 days wail congress is in session the bill will automatically become a law. However, if congress goes out of session and the president still does nothing

In this essay, I will be writing about how the power relationship between the United States Congress and the presidency has changed during the past two hundred years. I will be talking about how the executive branch is more powerful than the legislative branch and how the changing relationship between Congress and the president affected American democracy in a good way.

Madison wrote the Federalist Paper 51 presenting and explaining how a branch of government with too much power can become tyrannical, but, if we have them separated, it can protect the liberty. Each branch (legislative, executive and judiciary) should be independent, not having power to interfere in the other two branches, making the citizens the one who are gonna elect their representatives in each branch through elections. Madison claims, "It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part. Different interests necessarily exist in different classes of citizens. If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure”. It shows the benefits of these factors, discussing how each branch would protect liberty, especially to the minority parties.

Additionally, if the bill becomes vetoed then congress can also “allow a bill to become law without the president's signature” by overriding the presidential veto (Geer, et al.410).

The various and varied roles of the Office of the President add to as well as detract from the ideal of the Madisonian Model of democracy. For example, there are instances such that at any given point the American President may act judicial-like and at other times may act legislative-like which deviates from the Madisonian Model.

In document B and C, separation of powers of the three branches, legislative, judicial, and executive, ensures that not one power is greater than the other. However, as a form of checks and balances, the branches should not be separated to the point of having no constitutional control over each other. Madison stated "Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct." (Federalist paper #51) but “..they may be a check on the other” (Federalist paper #51) meaning that the three branches have separate powers, but are able to have constitutional control on each other. For example, Legislative branch can approve the presidential nomination, override a president’s veto, and impeach the president from the executive branch while the senate confirms the president's nominations for the judges and remove them from the office from the judicial branch”. While,the executive branch can veto the congressional legislation from the legislative branch and nominate judges for the judicial branch. The judicial branch can declare presidential acts unconstitutional in the executive branch and declare laws unconstitutional to the legislative branch. (Document C). Framer guarded against tyranny through separation of powers but still being able to check on each other and having constitutional control on each other. The branches should be separate and distinct as if they were together, it would be given too much absolute power to one group. Checks and balances illustrates how the constitution guarded against tyranny because the three branches have fair opportunity to stop the other branches from committing an unconstitutional act. Additionally to how checks and balances the constitution from tyranny, “The Great Compromise” does the

When forming the three branches, James Madison knew they each had to be separated, but have equal power, thus giving different jobs to each and solving the issue of one possibly gaining too much power(Document B). The job given to the legislative branch is to illustrate, or make, laws and consists of the Senate and House of Representatives(Ibid). The executive branch now enforces those laws and the power is in the hands of the President(Ibid). The judicial branch is powered by the Supreme Court and has the job of forming courts and making sure laws are dealt with correctly(Ibid). This separation of powers guards against tyranny by balancing power so one branch is not higher than

The power that the legislative branch holds over the executive branch is the power to go against the vetoes. So if the president decides to veto a bill, for example, the legislative branch can then go an override the veto, and then the process that the bill goes through will just have to start again. “I'm just a bill” from Schoolhouse Rock

The president has the power to sign bills into laws. The president also has the power to veto laws and send them back to the house. If a disagreement between the house and executive branch, the president has the authority. The president may also appoint or remove justices from their seats if needed.

The Separation of Powers is a principle by which powers are divided among different branches of government to make sure no one branch has too much power. James Madison, in Federalist Paper #47, said, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny…” (Document B). He decided that the power would be separated into three different branches, to prevent the risk of dictatorship. Each branch would have separate jobs and duties, as “...

The president also has the power Veto laws passed by congress. The president has the power to make political appointment and negotiate treaties with foreign countries, however this power also requires the approval of the senate. The President is responsible for making a for appointing his cabinet and federal judges. The president is capable of calling congress in session and the power to adjourn congress.

We have all heard about presidential signing statements, however, many don’t understand the definition of the term. What are presidential signing statements? What is the purpose of a signing statement? Well, let us find out! A presidential signing statement is simply a written declaration sporadically issued by the President when he signs a bill into law. Additionally, the purpose of presidential signing statements differs. Presidential signing statements can be rhetorical, political or constitutional. It also worth noting that the constitution is silent about presidential signing statements. It neither allow nor outlaw presidential signing statements. However, the constitution does state that the president has the authority to veto any bill approved by congress, and the power to check that the laws are truly implemented.

The two chambers can, and often do, reject the president's pet proposals. They frequently write and pass legislation that the president opposes, daring the chief executive either to veto it or seek a compromise.

In discussing the Madisonian Dilemma, one must first ask, “How do you give government enough authority to preserve social order and communal values, but not so much that it places unfair and inappropriate limits on individual freedom of choice?” (Bond & Smith 2013, p. 111) This delicate balance between governmental rights and individual freedoms has been a source of much contention and debate. James Madison, a primary framer of the Constitution and author of 30 of the Federalist Papers, believed that the only way this balance of power could be achieved was through controlling the effects of factions through a representative government, fragmenting the power of that government and creating a system of checks and balances within, and