We Must First Ask, What Is Bioethics?

The studying of stem cells is a very controversial issue that has been around since 1998 when the research of the use of embryonic stem cell treatment began. The main issues surrounding the discussion of treating people with life-altering disabilities through the use of these pluripotent cells is the ethicality of the matter and whether or not it is a savage act against a fetus. Many who oppose the use of these stem cells derived from excess embryos use the formerly stated opinion to support their argument, while those who are pro research argue that the destroying of one life could save another. The core complications that arise in studying stem cells lies in many Christian-like ethics and morals, otherwise called Christian bioethics. These are rooted in the modern day controversies arising due to advancements made in biology and medicine, mixed with religious views that argue against it. The conflicting interests of the polar opposites which are scientists and those with religious views have caused many complications along the way to discovering new treatments and cures for diseased cells. This bumpy road which has refrained scientists from making tremendous breakthroughs must smooth itself out, and the only way possible is through coming to an agreement that certain stem cell research should be practiced, such as the IPSC and adult stem cells, and others like the

If we were unable to research or experiment to better our society, we would not be anywhere near where we currently are in the medical world. The benefits of stem cell research really could push us that much more forward and get us that much closer to possibly finding cures for incurable diseases. This is a huge milestone for science and should continue to be researched. However, no matter the benefits stem cell research has and will remain an ethical debate for many years to come. We need to be able to open our mind to all the opportunities that stem cell research could generate instead of automatically jumping to conclusions regarding

Embryonic stem cell research is a controversial topic nationwide, because of its clash of ethical and moral values. Many people, including those suffering from diseases that this research is seeking to cure, do not believe in killing a living embryo in order to advance research and science.

If the government does not adequately fund research on stem cells, it makes sense that large amounts of discoveries would be made. It is in the government's best interest to represent the country as a whole, which would not be possible by taking one specific side of the ethical debate. Certainly, there are major advantages, as well as major issues, with stem cell research, but the most critical area of dispute comes with the idea of reproductive cloning through stem

There are only a small number of issues that are controversial as far as the public, the government and scientists are concerned. The father of all issues, however, is the debate that revolves around the ethics of stem cell research. Stem cells can be defined as "those cells in an embryo that essentially give rise to the entire organism" (Capra, 1999).

Imagine living in a world without cancer, Parkinson 's, or even diabetes. While everyone may wish this is true, people are against a way that researchers can make this possible, which would be by the use of stem cells. There is major controversy on whether or not stem cell research should be allowed, especially when it comes to embryonic stem cell research. Although many consider it to be killing a potential life form, embryonic stem cell research may eventually be acceptable to use because there is consent and a lengthy process to make sure the donor understands what their embryonic stem cells will be used for. That may be viewed as a much better

Many different groups of people protest stem cell research. Some protesters say that getting stem cells from embryos amounts to killing a person to improve the life of another (Freedman 18). People protest stem cell research even though the embryos and fetuses would be discarded anyway (Freedman 19). They think if it is accepted, they will start experimenting on people who are going to die, like death row inmates and terminally ill people (Freedman 22). Some supporters of stem cell research say that using tissue from dead embryos is equivalent to transplanting organs from people that died from homicide or suicide. They say stem cell experiments in animals have already shown improvements in disorders. Treatments for diseases and disorders can’t be developed if experiments aren’t performed.

While embryonic stem cell research has been ongoing for more than 30 years, it has only become a controversial topic over the past decade. The embryonic stem cell was first isolated in 1981 by two scientists at the University of Cambridge. However, it wasn’t until 1998 at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, where the first batch of embryonic stem cells were created in a test tube. In 2001, President George W. Bush approved the use of federal funding for research on this topic, following this action the stem cell controversy has been developing. The controversy around this topic focuses heavily on the ethical portion of stem cell research rather than the scientific evidence. Stem cell research has shown great promise for potentially

I think that my religious beliefs has helped to form this idea that embryonic stem cell research is unethical and immoral. My position on this topic will never change because someday I may be a parent, an aunt, or even a grandmother, I cannot begin to imagine losing a relative or child due to research. Will it eventually help society and create cures we otherwise would not have? Yes; however, killing unborn, defenseless babies is something that I will never agree with. Embryonic stem cell research, while it has its benefits, is immoral and unethical to do in today’s time. This major issue in today’s society, does not force us to make a choice between science and ethics or science and religion. Rather it gives us a choice as to how we go forward in scientific and medical progress (Embryonic Stem

Immorality( being unethical) is a large issue in today’s society.Embryonic stem cell research is right next to abortion and murder on the “Immoral” list. I am strongly against embryonic stem cell research because , it is taking away the human rights of the child that could be born. All humans are conceived with the right of life. The intentional obtention of human embryonic stem cells deliberately destroys the human forming in the cell. All human beings, not just adults, not just children; not just

The first topic is whether or not the research is carried out ethically. According to this article, researchers are required to comply with extremely strict regulations that have been set up in accordance with national and international standards. The next issue brought up is where the embryos come from. All embryos used come from embryos created from in vitro fertilization. All embryos used would have otherwise been destroyed and thrown out. These embryos are freely given and must have explicit consent from the donor. Embryos never come from aborted fetuses. One downside to this form of research is that embryos used are almost always destroyed in the process. However, all of the embryos would have been destroyed either way. Another misconception is that adult stem cells are just as useful as embryonic stem cells. This is not true. While adult stem cells can be useful, they are not nearly as useful as embryonic stem cells. The main difference is that embryonic stem cells have a special ability to grow into any type of cell such as a neuron, heart cell, or bone cell. Adult stem cells do not possess this ability. Heart stem cells can only turn into heart cells. Another worry is that embryonic stem cell research will lead to human cloning, however, The National Academy of Sciences and The International Society for Stem Cell Research have both banned human

This day in age disease, infection, disorders and mysterious syndromes are more present now than ever. */***You forget to wash your hands after using the restroom? You just spread viruses like E.Coli and put someone 's life in danger*/***. But in a world full of diseases that are seemingly becoming harsher and more resistant to conventional treatments, answers to the latest ailments are popping up in the form of miniscule pieces biological tissue called stem cells. Stem cells are pluripotent cells that are present in all living organisms and have pi

Many people consider it to be unethical, but on the other hand just as many people believe it is helpful to society. Stem cells and embryos have become the new medical crutch of treating diseases. This type of research has contributed to many medical discoveries, and it continues to offer many alternatives. Embryonic stem cell Research is important to biomedical research and society because of all of the possibilities that it brings, but also it has it down falls when compared to adult stem cell research. Adult stem cell research also has complications, but this type of research is considering to be safer and has a higher success yield, when it comes to dealing with complicated diseases. With all the evidence that points to the pro of stem cell research, one can help but to remember that this research is considered unethical by a number of

As with all fields of science, stem cells have, and are still, been the subject of multiple court cases, some of which conclude with the defendant 's case winning. For example in the Moore v. Regents of University of California et al, the plaintiff accused the Regents of University of California, specifically Dr. Golde, of using his cells for lucrative medical research without his permission (Moore v. The Regents of The University of California et al., 1990). This case doesn’t specifically address stem cells, but it opened the door to how much ownership a patient really has over his cells once they have been removed. It affected the position that donors of stem cells, embryos and adults, have in these types of controversial cases, and thus had a negative impact on the ethics of stem cells.

Stem cell research is a controversial topic and this paper will talk about both sides of the controversy. The controversy started back in 1998 when the first successful culturing of human embryonic stem cells was performed. The research surrounding stem cells has been the center of a huge debate mainly because of ethics and morals.