We Should Not Be Afraid Of Change Essay

Recent breakthroughs in the field of genetics and biotechnology have brought attention to the ethical issues surrounding human enhancement. While these breakthroughs have many positive aspects, such as the treatment and prevention of many debilitating diseases and extending human life expectancy well beyond its current limits, there are profound moral implications associated with the ability to manipulate our own nature. Michael Sandel’s “The Case Against Perfection” examines the ethical and moral issues associated with human enhancement while Nick Bostrom’s paper, “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity” compares the positions that transhumanists and bioconservatists take on the topic of human enhancement. The author’s opinions on the issue of

Transhumanism is a “is a politically and emotionally charged word that scientists are referring to as the augmentation of the human condition through technology, primarily to enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capabilities” (Jiang, 2015). Technological advancements play an ever-increasing part in our lives, more so now than any other time in mankind 's history. With advances in the fields of engineering, science, robotics, and neuroscience, I believe we are on the precipice of great and drastic change. This could equally lead to an ethical and social meltdown in our society. I think this fundamentally is a wrong idea because it goes against Gods creation, and core human values. Per (Ćirković, 2016), “Bio conservatives have argued against bio enhancement, as they believe that it is aimed at intervening in what has been ordained by God or given to us by nature.”

The use of human enhancement is becoming a popular debate in today’s society. We constantly ask ourselves and others if it is morally right to use technology to give couples the “perfect” baby? What about using it to make ourselves nearly perfect? Many people will automatically say no, but when asked why, they fail to come up with a decent response. Michael Sandel’s article, “What’s Wrong with Enhancement?” from Contemporary Moral Issues 4th edition by Lawrence M. Hinman gives us an inside look into what may actually be wrong with allowing human enhancements.

Told to us at a young age, we are supposed to love ourselves and love our bodies. Although in today’s times, that is not the case for everyone. Constantly people are changing their bodies. Whether because society tell us to be thinner, curvier, or look a certain way, or because we believe we were supposed to look a different way. Body modifications are common to see in millennials. Despite what most people say about loving your body, some change to acquire the love for themselves. Although, body modifications of how we want to look and how we feel we should have looked are two different things; therefore, Delaney’s “Our Bodies, Our Selves” and “Screaming Queens” contradict the theory of the term body modifications.

Human beings have constantly attempted to improve themselves through scientific technology. Whether it is through increasing physical attractiveness by cosmetic surgery, or decreasing likelihood of hereditary disorders using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, the territory of human enhancement has nurtured expanded over time. Since scientific and technological developments are occurring at such a rate, while the institutions that control and direct them may still be left behind, we may well experience the technological boom before we know how to react to it. In this paper, I will discuss and analyze the question of whether and how we should continue with human enhancement in two main aspects: firstly, I

“If the body can be unmade and remade through biotechnology, what implications does this have for our identity as human beings” - Rachel Kent *

Bostrom argues that society can adapt to see the worth in modified, “posthuman” people, allotting them dignity and rights as humans even though they are modified (Bostrom 3). Sade looks at genetic modification through a much more practical lens, observing real, immediate benefits and drawbacks of genetic modification rather than overarching philosophy. There are undoubtedly many dangers and problems that will arise from mainstream genetic modification, some that may even shake the foundation of the society and culture of today. However, countless benefits come with gene therapy as well. Concrete improvements to the human race, from increased intelligence, athleticism, and height, to immunization from major diseases to perhaps eventually immortality. These benefits largely outweigh the ethical drawbacks that society will surely adapt to as the years go on. Many groundbreaking technologies have changed the structure of society in the past, like the cotton gin, assembly line, and internet. Each time, humans have successfully adapted to take full advantage of the benefits while manage the dangers and drawbacks, concrete and cultural. Whether people like it or not, mainstream genetic modification is inevitable as technology keeps increasing, and society should find solutions to manage it rather than cower from it. The future is coming, and humans should be ready for the

Each of the poems written by Yasmin Lewis and Steven Oliver delivered their own message and meaning. While Yasmin’s untitled poem (2016) seem to be the confession of a depressed teenage girl, “It’s time for change” by Steven (2016) expressed his anger in the world filled with hate and how he hoped to change it. Despite that major difference, there is a special linking between them that is waiting for audience to unlock.

Some of the more minor uses of genetic engineering are those that involve cosmetic procedures like implants for a more personally achievable body image. Arguments made to support this are that it helps increase a person’s self-esteem, thus helping eliminate personal discrepancies. However, these procedures are purely elective and serve little to no purpose on the person’s actual health (Torres 48). Some of these procedures, like breast reductions, can better someone’s health by decreasing back pain, but these make up a small percentage of cosmetic surgeries. Because these procedures are elective and serve no purpose to health, they are considered as genetic enhancement, which is why they should not be allowed to be sought out. Unless necessary, where it would be considered gene therapy, cosmetic procedures should not be allowed because the person is changing their original image for no reason other than a different body image.

To guarantee a wholesome, enriching experience of change in the individual it is vital to accept struggle. Facing the struggle can test relationships, introduce unclear perception of ones identity and produce unpredictable situations; though change must be able to transpire to truly create complete development in the individual. Director Ron Howard discovers the unique mind that takes root inside the individual, by overcoming the cruel affects schizophrenia causes and instead welcoming positive change in his film ‘A Beautiful Mind’ (2001). Likewise S.E Hinton reveals the ability of humankind to move forward within erratic moments, deal with rebellion in optimistic ways and embrace new

Perspectives on change The ethics of organizational change Planned change and its critics Strategic change Building and developing competitive advantage 3 39 73 11 1 147

Change is unescapable and essential to succeed in today 's competitive world. In fact, entire human history is nothing but an ever changing endeavor to adapt to multiple changes. Under this context, Today 's leaders have to be very conscious that the human psychological aspect is a fundamental component of any change process - the different phases and coping mechanism that people need to go through to let go of the past and be ready for a new start. Hence, a true leader should constantly focus on strategic planning encompassing human transition and eventually helping the organization embrace change, as we know that in current business world, failure to adapt to changes is a recipe for tragedy. (Quiros, 2014).

Humans are social animals by nature. There is an ever-present urge to assimilate into society for person gain or comfort regardless of a person’s place of birth. Through personal observations, in both the Western and Eastern cultures, the region a person is brought up does not definitively matter when it concerns physical insecurities or how someone goes about remodeling themselves. Some go about change through adapting their dietary habits and fitness regimes to achieve their ideal body, but in other cases, a person’s ideal is not achievable through natural means. At that stage, if someone is willing, they can turn to cosmetic surgery to sate their desires of the perfect body. This course of action is not recommended. Plastic surgery is detrimental to the individual and subsequently to modern society with how frequent the media promotes highly specific traits to even be considered beautiful while the target audience does not naturally fit into this mold. Therefore, plastic surgery exorbitantly changes how individuals perceive social status—based on idealized features—which can directly equate to a higher standard of living; additionally, it can also alter current societal mindsets concerning the epitome of beauty (whichever features is considered more advantageous) will result in the homogenization of the standard of beauty.

It all started on August 23, 2005. It seemed like it was just going to be another average day. Nicole had stayed the night at Dawn’s and now they were both walking down to the bus stop for school. Nicole’s blonde hair blew in the wind while her pink earrings clanked like a wind chime. They stepped on to the bus and prepared for the long ride. Nicole and Dawn started noticing clouds moving in from the ocean. They were moving faster and faster. Every second they got darker. They both remembered watching the news report that morning. It said to expect heavy thunderstorms. They didn’t really think about it and were soon stepping off the bus. They walked into their school, Lincoln Bay High, and headed

There are several challenges with education. Some are specific to regions, district, and cites. Some are influenced by people’s culture, religious belief and even perception about education. Most of these challenges are hard to pinpoint, discuss and even find solutions. Yet there are several major challenges that are not only the basics of most of these more difficult challenges to address but are also very widespread all over Ghana and are the trigger to some other more detrimental problems. This paper seeks discuss how the mismanagement, distribution and access to funds have greatly hampered the progress of Ghana in not only reaching the UN millennium development goal to provide education to all children in Ghana, but also to provide them with good quality education. It also how addresses how the low qualifications or in some parts no qualifications to become a teacher and absenteeism by teachers affect the type of education students in Ghana receive. There are number of institutions set up to train teachers, however most of the cut off grades for these colleges are a bit lower than the average university cut-off grade point which is the major route for people who complete their