‘We must recognize that representative democracy has failed, both politically and judicially as

We chose to institute a direct democracy instead of a representative democracy. A direct democracy occurs when all of the citizens propose and vote on laws. This is modeled after the Assembly in ancient Athens. In contrast, a representative democracy happens when the people elect a representative who proposes laws for them and a group of government officials vote to pass or reject the law, which is similar to the current government of the United States of America.

Despite their similarities, direct democracy and representative democracy have some important differences that distinct on from the other. One of the key differences is in

Direct democracy can be defined as a system of democracy in which citizens participate in the majority of legislation; therefore, granting them political self-determination. A representative democracy (also indirect democracy) is a form of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people. A direct democracy has leaders that are chosen specifically by “The People”. There is no Electoral College, or elected officials, to cast the votes of the people, the people cast their own direct votes.

Representative Democracy – the citizens choose a smaller group to represent them, make laws, and govern on their behalf, but the people remain the source of the government’s authority.

A representative democracy is where certain groups are represented by a number of people who were elected by the public (that meet the voting requirements) based off of their prospering abilities to help make big decisions for the country. Our constitution proves this fact according to this quote: “The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and that the electors shall have the qualifications requisite for the electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.” quoted from document five. The definition of Democracy is: A form of government that allows most citizens of a state or a country to influence decisions based off of a popular vote. Another form of democracy is a Direct Democracy. A Direct Democracy is a form of government where all big and small decisions are strictly in the hands of the citizens of the public. Even though that Direct Democracy is different than Representative Democracy, they both have some similarities. For instance, in Document Three it states that “When settling private disputes, everyone is equal before the laws”. In our constitution, it says all men should be treated as

The representative democracy a type of government where citizens vote for representative to work on their behalf. The article you can find representative democracy is the U.S. Constitution. The reason the U.S. Constitution was in the political liberation because they wasn’t trying to divide the federal and state government. The article didn’t require states to follow the laws congress passed, but the constitution say federal laws are superior to state laws. That why the U.S. Constitution is in political liberation cause they wasn’t give federal the same power as the state

Under Representational democracy, elected officials represent a group of people. The people have the ability to elect their leaders. Some laws associated with Representational democracy are flawed. Starting with the voting age, there are biased principles as to what age citizens should have the

1). Through these concepts democracy has enhanced the lives of many people throughout the world. It promotes individual liberty and with individual liberty a person is allowed “freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, and freedom to own private property (Lynn-Jones). Representative government is the ideal type of polity, it allows for the improvement of the polity. People are able to engage with their government and are not just passive recipients. The government by design has to respond to the people and promote the public interest. The responsibility is on the people to be attentive, capable of taking action when needed, and to have wise judgement as to the actions of its government

Since the MPs are accountable for the people and have to represent the constituencies views they are expected to be transparent about their decisions people can contact their local MP and have their view heard meaning that it would be a democratic institution due to people having an input. It can be suggested that the House of Commons is ,to an extent a democratic institution because there are regular debates there and they also have things in place like democracy live which is live coverage weekly from the House of Commons where people can ask questions and hear about what is happening in the House of

Democracy is a form of government which dominates the western world. In democracy, every person is given equal input into matters of the state, although this does happen to varying degrees. There exist many different types of democracy. Absolute or direct democracy occurs when each citizen personally participates in all decision-making processes. This system is difficult to maintain due to the vast number of people and the necessity for all people to be informed, logical, and educated when making many decisions. This form of democracy has not existed in significant sized populations. Representative democracy is a type of government in which the people elect government officials to make decisions concerning the state. The two most prevalent types of representative democracy are democratic republics and parliamentary democracies. In a democratic republic, such as the United States or Canada, the people elect both their representatives in government and their head of state. In a parliamentary democracy, such as the United Kingdom or Australia, the people elect their representatives and their representatives elect their head of state.

The type of government the United States has in the year 2016 can be characterized as a representative democracy. A representative democracy, also known as an indirect democracy, is a type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing the people. This type of government is structured upon citizens electing representatives to serve on their behalf. There are many people who simply do not have the time to educate themselves about every particular issue involved in government; therefore, the people do not govern directly. In a representative democracy, the people elect representatives to act on their behalf and to represent them in governing the political society; therefore, power originates with the people. In order for a representative democracy to work effectively, there must be open communication between the representatives and the citizens. The elected officials need to represent the citizens in the best interest of the majority of the people. Overall, the goal of a representative democracy is to protect the rights and interests of the citizens by giving the citizens a voice within the government.

A weakness of democracy is the “Tyranny of the Majority”. This is an inevitable pitfall, because in a democracy, the power is vested foremost in the people the constituting the society itself. Alexis de Tocqueville wrote on this concept:

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of eligible voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society.[14] With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of the eligible voters, democracy can also be characterized as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.[15]

one essential conviction, expressed in the word democracy itself: that power should be in the hands of the people. Although democracy today has been slightly inefficient in this idea, with the wealthy, elite class challenging this right, “it nevertheless claims for itself a fundamental validity that no other kind of society shares….” To completely understand the structure of democracy, one must return to the roots of the practice itself, and examine the origins in ancient Greece, the expansion in the Roman Empire, and how these practices combined make what we recognize as today’s democratic government.

Democracy and its critics is a political science book written by Robert Dahl In 1989 and published by Yale University Press in America. The book looks at the assumptions of the democratic theory and is able to test them in relation to the questions raised by critics. Thereafter, Dahl suggests the ways in which the states must move towards improving their democracy.