Weapons, Religion, And Code Of Conduct

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Roughly in the years 1000 to 1600 CE there were Samurai and knights. They were two very different but very similar warriors. Samurai were the knights of japan and knights were the samurai of europe. Both made from a lack of army and government, both needing land or payment, and both giving their lives to their master. They look very different, but are they more similar than they seem? Keep reading to find out.

From approximately 1000-1600 ce knights and samurai existed in Europe and Asia. Although they were around the same time period they were different. Knights were the European warriors and the samurai were the Japanese warriors. Although they are both warriors their codes and the way of preparing for battle were different. The similarities may look like they are great but there are small specific differences between the knights and samurai.

In medieval Europe and Japan there were warriors called samurai and knights that protected their region (Doc. 1). The samurai fought in Japan and knights fought in Europe (Doc. 1). Knights were famous for riding on horseback but the samurai would ride too (Doc.1). Samurai were mainly famous for their karate skills and acrobatic moves (Doc. C). One key characteristic for both the samurai and knights was that they were both loyal (Doc. E). They had to be because they played a big part in feudalism (Doc. A). Both warriors had a code that they abided (Doc. E). Bushido was the code for the samurai and Chivalry for the knights (Doc. E). The samurai and knights were great warriors who fought from 1000 AD to 1600 CE an their similarities are greater than their differences.

Samurai and knights always battling out in the battlefield. During this time both knights and samurai were fighting for protection. Both were developing codes such as Chivalry and Bushido. Both had a some sort of leader weather it's a shogun or a pope. Some historians will argue that samurai and knights are more different than similar, but they are more similar than different. The samurai and knights were more similar than different because they had similar armor and they had the same type of social pyramid.

A thousand years ago, a class of professional warriors arose. Who swore their oath of loyalty to the noble lords. In which, the Daimyos fought to death to defend their land. This lead to Japan developing a group of warriors called samurai. In Europe, they also developed a group of warriors and these warriors were called knights. There were some similarities between a knight and samurai. For one, they both had a social pyramid. Another reason would be because of their armour and warfare. The last similarity that they had would be their code of honor. The similarities between a knight and samurai were greater than the differences because of their social positions, armour, code of honor, and warfare.

Japan is 5,313 miles away from Europe, could it be possible that they have many similarities? Knights and samurai are similar, but some may say that they had different code of honors and different religions and weapons, but this may not be the truth. Samurai and knights had similar views of death, similar codes of honor, and similar training methods. This essay is the real evidence.

Today I will compare the Samurai with Knights. The samurai are warriors from Japan and Knights are warriors from Europe. The samurai and knights are both similar, but there are also many differences. The Samurai and knights training is my first topic.

Samurais and knights are different in many ways, but they are also very similar in some ways as well. First of all, training. Samurais and knights both start training during childhood, and they both used artificial swords. The samurai, however train differently in some ways by learning poetry and Kendo as well! At the age of 14, the training samurais would officially become a samurai in a ceremony called Genpuku. Knights would usually become a squire at the age of 14 with all the knowledge on how to ride a horse. Both samurai and knights showed loyalty to their master. According to Document A, it says,”School was a unique combination of physical training, poetry, and spiritual discipline.” You can see that the samurai training was alike in many ways but also different in ways compared to the knight training.

Nearly a thousand years ago, knights and samurai were the military forces in Europe and Japan. During the time period 1066 to 1868, knights and samurai formed the military society in both Japan and Europe (Doc. 2). Although it seems like they are similar, the differences between knights and samurai outweigh the similarities, such as the codes, armor, and their training.

The samurai’s and knights were two warriors from two different civilizations from across the world, yet they had many similarities, as well as differences. To start, they both started training in their childhood and participated in spiritual practice. One difference about their training is knights learned how to ride horses and acquired great horse skills. In Document B it states, “A prospective knight’s training began at age four or five with learning to ride a pony.” Similarities in armor between the two warrior classes include the fact that both had very heavy armor. One unique difference was that samurai had their right arm without armor for flexibility while handling a bow. According to Document C, “Samurai did not wear armor on their

A knight in Feudal Europe were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for in return, land. A samurai in Feudal Japan were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for either regular payment or land. While knights and samurais have many similarites, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons& armor, code , and training.

A long time ago during the middle ages Europe and Japan both developed a class of warriors. These warriors were called Samurai and Knights all though these two warriors had different names and they knew nothing about each other. They both had a lot of Similarities for example there social position, their training, and their honor. They also had a lot of differences but their similarities were greater than their differences. This can be show by looking at three areas document A, B, and C.

The government of Europe and Japan started to decentralize and weaken, with the use of feudalism. To protect their empires, Europe use knights and Japan used samurai as their warriors. The knights and samurai were more different than they were similar. Knights and samurai excelled in different areas. The samurai and knights had different roles in the feudal system. Lastly, the samurai and knights believed different things.

The Catholic Church believes that the "gun control is clearly not in the gospel", therefore the Church believes it is not wrong to own a gun nor not possessing a gun. The Catholic opinion states that they cannot prohibit Catholic's from purchasing or using firearms. Furthermore, the Church believes that Catholic's do not need to stand behind the bishops in support of this issue, as it is certainly not a requirement to support a ban on firearms in