Went Ho Lee

After reading “the Innocent Man” by Pamela Colloff’s who write a long journalism about Michael Morton, who was found guilty for murdering his wife Christine was sentenced for fifteen years in prison. Later founding that Michael was Innocent after reinvestigating his case, capturing DNA testing and finding new evidence was able to help prove his innocence. The theme of this essay a widow husband who seek to fight for his freedom in prison and staying connected with his son. Michal son Eric gave him a reason to have hope that they would one day reunite and his son would know for himself that he did murder his wife. The point of view of this essay although a man is falsely accuse for a crime he did not commit he is self-determined to fight.

When a writer presents an argument in a piece of writing, readers want to hear facts that support said argument. The readers want hard evidence and facts to support whatever you are trying to get them to believe in. In “Rough Justice”, by Alejandro Reyes and in “Time to Assert American Values” the authors described what happened to Michael Fay and give their opinion on the matter. In the article, “Rough Justice” by Alejandro Reyes, the author uses logos and unbiased writing to have the most sufficient and relevant argument.

6. Pretrial detainees are "walking legal contradictions" because “According to the U.S. Constitution, they are innocent until proven guilty. At the same time, by being incarcerated while awaiting trial, they are denied a number of personal freedoms and are subjected to the poor conditions of manu jails” (Gaines

The cumulative effect of this perspective is that if the judge is hard on the allegedly obscene editors and misrepresents their defence to the jurors, this would only be what you would expect of such a second-rate individual. Robertson’s presentation, based on truth, is heavily influenced by bias and opinion against the judge and, thereby, in favour of the defendants. The eventual verdict of guilty is seen to be inevitable. The editors were sent to prison for psychiatric examination.

The court calls for Hutchinson to “lay herself open,” but she has clearly already done so. When Winthrop argues that his argument has more weight than hers because of quantity, he has done nothing but condemn himself. She has to say less to defend herself because she has done no wrong; the prosecution has wrought more accusations because none have

Facts: D was arrested for fleeing from police. charged w/ obstruction of justice and use of a deadly weapon. He pled guilty to lesser offenses and was sentenced to pay a fine. He was forced to take a delousing agent. W/ O touching the detainees, officers looks at all parts of the detainees. D alleges that he was told to lift his genitals, and cough while squatting. D was then admitted into the jail facility , released the next day, and the charges were dismissed.

When you present an argument in a piece of writing, readers want to hear facts that support said argument. The readers want hard evidence and facts to support whatever you are trying to get them to believe in. In “Rough Justice”, by Alejandro Reyes and in “Time to Assert American Values” the authors described what happened to Michael Fay and give their opinion on the matter. In the article, “Rough Justice” by Alejandro Reyes, the author uses logos and unbiased writing to have the most sufficient and relevant argument.

In Padilla v. Rumsfeld, an American citizen was arrested in Chicago as he stepped off an airplane. Federal authorities received a tip that he was planning on conducting a terrorist attack using a dirty bomb. However, they did not have enough evidence to arrest him on the charge of terrorism and was subsequently held as a material witness. He was transferred to military custody and was sent to a prison in South Carolina. Over the next several years, his attorney's sued to the federal government alleging that he was being held without due process of law. In 2012, the Supreme Court denied to hear the case. They referred the matter back to US Court of Appeals. They dismissed the case, based upon the fact that the plaintiff's attorneys named Rumsfeld as the defendant. Instead, they should have named the military commander of the prison as the defendant. This means that the government can still hold onto Padilla and that his attorneys will have to re file using the proper procedures. ("Padilla v. Rumsfeld," 2012)

On 04/10/2018 I received an informal complaint from you, dated 04/10/2018. The topic of your informal complaint was a missing hobby craft that you claim to have dropped off at the Santa Cruz Unit programs office to COIII Keaton. In your complaint you stated that on March 1st you gave COIII Keaton a painting that you wanted to be included in a Tedx logo contest that was being held on March 2nd. You stated the painting needed to be turned into COIV Contreras, who was not in the programs office when you dropped the painting. You stated that COIII Keaton took possession of your painting, and told you that he would take it to COIV Contreras. You stated that on April 6th, Inmate Mounla #140057 informed you that your painting was lost, and that she confirmed this by asking COIV Contreras, COIV Flores, COIII Keaton, and Deputy Warden Theodore. You stated that inmate Mounla informed you that COIII Keaton stated that he did receive your painting, and that he immediately put it on COIV Contreras desk. Your proposed resolution was for your painting to be located.

“…and on the charge that the prisoner did with others to conspire to destroy the lives of soldiers in the military service of the United States in violation of the laws and customs of war-Guilty” were the words that soared out of Wallace’s mouth at the end of the trial. It was then that Henry Wirz was found guilty. Why? Why was he found guilty? This decision was based on the emotional aspect of the witnesses, and not by the actual guilt. Not only my defense, but also the defense of Wirz’s attorney, Baker, the testimony of the defendant, Henry Wirz, shows that Wirz should not have been found guilty.

This journal graphically and briefly describes the work and life of Judge Parker and the men who reported to him throughout his career. In the article it presents many personal references of how the Judge was perceived by the public and the government. The journal takes you through the process of understand Judge Parkers career which led him to Fort Smith where he became the “Hanging Judge”. George Maledon is referenced in the article as “instrumental in Parker’s career” (Riggs, 1955). In the journal it mentions “that although Parker had respect amongst the community at that time it was not the same for his deputies including and most of all Maledon” (Riggs, 1955). Riggs describes Maledon as “a perfectionist”, “German born with little

I Wen Zhi Li, give permission to John Li to work on his own work outside of the AP Calculus Classroom. Preferably in the library. As he prefers to quietly perform his studies alone. However, he wishes to continue to receive booklets from you. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at

Born in Chicago, she was the heiress to the International Harvester fortune. She had an avid interest in mysteries and medical texts and was inspired by Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s fictional detective who relied on his powers of observation and logic. She married at 19, had three children and after her marriage dissolved, she began to pursue her interests. She met George Burgess Magrath in 1898; Magrath studied medicine at Harvard and later became a medical examiner. He would discuss with Lee his concerns about investigators’ poor training, and how they would overlook or contaminate evidence at crime scenes. After receiving her inheritance, Lee began working in a New Hampshire police department and became police captain. In 1943, she began designing her

Innocent, or to be more precise, not found guilty in the eyes of the Law anyway. However, after leaving the courtroom, he was soon to discover than did not necessarily apply to the eyes of the Public, or

The accusations against him, brought by Briony Tallis, held him responsible for the violation of her cousin Lola. Robbie reflects on this, as Briony plans to refute her statement to the police, “The intricacies were lost to him, the urgency had died. Briony would change her evidence, she would rewrite the past so that the guilty became the innocent. But what was guilt these days? It was cheap. Everyone was guilty, and no one was. No one would be redeemed by a change of evidence, for there weren’t enough people… to…gather in the facts.” (188) Robbie’s loss of security and his future took away the childlike carefreeness he displayed before the accusation. Briony’s conscience weighs heavily on her as she moves from a naïve implication to the realization of the consequences.