What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Participatory Monitoring?

Different observation techniques help to focus the observation so appropriate data is collected and presented in meaningful ways.

In the year of 2013, the activities of the NSA was exposed to the public and what we found out was infuriating. Apparently the National Security Association has been snooping through the personal records of the public looking for warning signs of terrorist activity. Now, this might not come off as a problem at first glance however, they are doing so without our permission. Why does this matter to you? Well the NSA could be tracking you at this very moment as you read this article. Shocking right? Government surveillance is a bad program with good intentions. Since it is violating the rights of the people, proven to be flawed, and lacks explanation as to what it really is, it is a no-no.

It is importance that you of selecting the appropriate method to help reach your purpose. When caring out an observation you should carry out the type of observations to suit desired aim of it.

This puts a lot of pressure on the public services as they want to meet there set time and not face life changing outcomes for not being on target.

| -The observer may be biased-There is no control over variables, so it makes it difficult to draw conclusions (Brain, C, 2000).-Requires high level of participation which can cost a lot and take up a lot of time-People might change their behaviour if they know that they are being observed-Researcher might miss something while they are watching and taking notes (University of Surrey, 2014).

Electronic monitoring is a device that allows Justice Officers and officials to ensure an offender is at a certain location when 65 required to be there. The use of the monitoring device is becoming more popular as a way to control and supervise offenders within the community to ensure citizens are safe. In the mid-1960 a Harvard Psychologist Robert Schwitzgebel developed the first electronic monitoring device. The device was intended to provide an inexpensive alternative for offenders than incarceration or within the justice process. Even though the device was patented in 1969 it didn’t start coming into effect until the 1980’s. It’s used by courts to track the location of offenders that are under surveillance or restricted to certain areas.

time. The HR & IT departments cannot start planning for implementation at the same time that

Electronic monitoring found that monitoring significantly reduces the likelihood of failure under community supervision. The decline in the risk of failure is about 31 percent compared with offenders placed in other forms of community supervision which was founded by a NIJ-funded study of Florida offenders. The concept of electronically monitoring offenders in the community was conceived by an American psychologist, Dr. Robert Schweitzgebel in the 1960s, but it took almost twenty years to become a reality in corrections. Electronic monitoring was approved by the Florida legislature in 1987, and the Florida Department of Corrections started using Radio Frequency systems in 1988 for house arrest cases where offenders where required to be home

The issue between government surveillance and individual rights has been around for a while now. Government surveillance is a topic that makes most people feel uncomfortable because the idea of having someone seeing your every move is disturbing. All though many say that it is for our own safety it still has several negative outcomes. For example, our personal privacy would be completely lost, the purchasing of programs and software to see everything would be expensive, and people would not feel safe due to the fact that they would not know who exactly is seeing their personal information and what they could do with it.

The physical presence of the researcher and his use of direct observation have tremendous positive effects on the quality of data generated and further enhances it. This is so because it has the capacity to do the following.

“The consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival” (Orwell). The world today is full of many dangers domestic and abroad. It has become a routine in the news to report on the daily mass shooting or update with the war on terror. We live in a world where being worried is justified; however, we should not give up our constitutional rights in the face of fear. The NSA’s dragnet surveillance programs, such as PRISM, are both ineffective and are surpassed by less questionable national security programs. The FISA court's’ approval of NSA actions are not only illegal, but exist as an embarrassing formality. Surveillance is a necessary

“If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it,” ( Mark Twain). When i first started this essay I had so much hope in our government and I believed it was there to protect me. believe that polling was a positive way to see the the people thought or wanted . But when you can’t trust the people that created the polls you can’t trust the results.b

Cameras may not just be for capturing the perfect moment in someones life they can save lives as well. They have the power to change society for the better. Police body cameras are the big debate in the United States today. President Obama has made a notion to try to fund these gadgets as we speak. The public wonders if the pros outweigh the cons when it comes to these police cameras. Police cameras are more beneficial to society than they are harmful.

In general, there are several methods for data collection and the different data collection methods provided its own advantages and disadvantages (Sekaran 2003, p. 223). For carrying out the data collection, the appropriate methods should be applied. In the research, the data collection could be done through the interview, for example, face-to-face and telephone interview. To collect the data by using interview technique, the questionnaire is commonly employed as the instrument for gathering data, the questionnaire could be able to distribute by mail or electronic mail. In addition, the data collection could be conducted by observation of individuals with or without audio or video recording. Before choosing the methods for data collection the expertise of the researcher, the degree of accuracy required, time and resources must be taken into consideration. Thus,

The major advantage of observation studies over surveys, which obtain self-reported data from respondents, is that the data are free from distortions, inaccuracies, or other response biases due to memory error, social desirability bias, and so on. The data are recorded when the actual behavior takes place.