What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Rice Production?

In Malaysia, agriculture remains an important sector and it plays role as food providers, create employments and generate earnings from export products. The development of the agricultural sector is generally governed by a comprehensive and market driven agricultural policies. The agricultural policies were formulated and have enabled the agricultural sector to grow sustainably and also contributed to economy development in Malaysia. The agricultural policy set the direction for the agricultural sector. As a result, this sector has been transformed from a conventional and passive sector that focused on single commodity to a dynamic, diversified and modern sector.

Privatization is an instrument in a wider collection of tools for attracting investment and to improve the structure and performance (level of output and efficiency) of economic sectors in a country. This is because to stimulate investment and to grow simultaneously in economies in Malaysia face significant challenges. They have legitimate expectations of strengthening sometimes-fragile infrastructure and bringing short supply of essential services into some sort of balance with demand. They have legitimate wider social goals that are ultimately just as important in the functioning of an economy. These goals include promoting interaction and shared opportunities between rural areas and cities, developing levels of literacy and skills, equitably

Although farm subsidies all have their roots to one major piece of legislation, there are multiple variations that are common. One of such subsidy programs allows farmers to counter fluctuations in various aspects of their production. If prices for a crop take astounding hikes or fall dramatically, subsidies can provide in time of need. This is the most well-known farm subsidy program, but there are other aspects that get remarkably overlooked. Even insurance coverage, product marketing, research and conservation efforts are subsidized under the current Farm Bill. With the present situation, many Americans believe that the government carries too much control in the agricultural market. For a more detailed breakdown of where the funding in the Farm Bill goes to, see the pie chart below for a reference. These numbers are accurate as of the 2014 Farm Bill, per the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

Farm subsidies have become an somewhat debated topic in recent year, with increasing numbers of critics believing that these are detrimental not only to the economy, but also by implication to the health of Americans. Subsidies are offered by the USDA to farmers of commodity crops such as corn, wheat, rice, and livestock such as cattle. This makes these types of food cheaper than other, potentially healthier choices such as organic products. Farm subsidies were initially implemented after the Great Depression to help farmers cope with the economic effects after the Depression years. In other words, they were to stimulate the economy after the difficult years of the downturn. Although initially intended as a temporary measure, the subsidies remained part of the government assistance program for farmers even today. As a proponent of this system, my viewpoint is that farm subsidies ultimately benefits the United States in terms of protecting domestic product against foreign competition, national security, and American food aid to poorer countries.

At one point I feel farm subsidies were justified. However, as technology has advance, so has the ability for farmers to facilitate better yields from their land. With the unknown effects of climate change on the agriculture industry, it may be beneficial to the country to maintain these subsidies. There isn’t a problem until the cost of produce skyrockets. If subsidies for farmers disappear there will certainly be a spike in the price of produce. We as a country should do anything possible to maintain that all citizens have access to reasonably priced agriculture

There is enough food in the world, with some of it even being wasted, but the millions who are hungry do not have the money to buy food. Rice is a simple dish that is filling and cheap and it has become "the world's most important crop for ensuring food security and addressing poverty. " Rice is a versatile dish that can be transformed, and anything can be added to it to supplement nutrition.

Rice is very dependant on water and uses 2 and a half times as much water as other crops, this means drought and water scarcity is a huge problem. Flooding is also as big as a problem as rice grows on sloping rice paddies that are vulnerable to flooding because the water flows downhill meaning erosion affects all the crops. Urbanisation is somewhat of a problem because rice can be grown in a wide variety of places and the countries that export the most rice have station the farms far enough away that it won't be a problem for a long

The agriculture industry has been ever changing, due to the population increases. Subsidies keep the small farm going, protecting

Rice is now being able to be produced in any environment, including deserts to be able to feed millions of people. Some companies try to bring down the cost of rice by creating artificial rice. They do this by using broken grains of rice and embedding corn or soy products to them. They then polish the rice and add extra vitamins just as any other rice company.

“If the farmer is poor, then so is the whole country.” This is a quote by an anonymous author, and it is very true. Farmers produce food for the world. Without farmers, there would be no food. Agricultural subsidies help keep farms running by providing them with a consistent income. Subsides also promote advances in productivity and help manage the food supply.

Factory farming is a common farming method of confining animals such as chickens and pigs in tiny cramped places for mass food production, to get the best profit out of their product. Environmentalist and Animal Rights Activists strongly disagree with this way of food production as it causes stress and harm to the animals. Animals have the right to freedom and a happy, healthy life. But on the other side of the argument farmers and food companies say that without factory farming they wouldn’t be able to produce the same amount of food at the same price and in the same time. And then they’d have to put up meat prices in order to accommodate the new system. The Animal Rights activists are thinking about the animals whereas the farmers are

Would you rather test out medication on a human and have it fail or on an animal? Animal rights are not required in our world. People believe that animal testing, factory farming, and hunting are terrible but they help with a lot of things. Animal testing helps solve diseases. Factory farming helps feed people around the world. Hunting helps keep population of overpopulated animals down. Animal rights are pointless and they prevent so many helpful things from happening things that we need in this world. Such as Factory farming, animal testing and hunting. Factory Farming helps feed people around the world. Animal testing helps prevent diseases. Hunting connects people to nature.

There appears fewer studies on the effects of grassland to cropland conversion than on the forest to cropland conversions which has been studied in much more detail. For example, many soils in Africa under cereal crops were grasslands before they were cultivated. Conversion of these grassland has caused a decline in soil organic Carbon This decline reduced the nutrient stocks and resulted in the off-site effect of increased water and wind erosion. The large scale conversion of grassland in the central plains to cropland caused severe soil erosion reported by Uzoho et al, (2007).

324), Lester mentions its effect on crop production. “Crop ecologists at the Rice Research Institute in the Philippines and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have jointly concluded that each 1º C rise in temperature during the growing season cuts 10% off the yields of wheat, rice and corn (p. 315). In Lester Brown’s article the issue of industrialization was addressed. It shows a direct relation towards the growth of a country economically and its subsequent decline in the field of agriculture. Lester, using Japan as an example along with China, South Korea and Taiwan, says that through rapid industrialization of a country lands that were dedicated to crop production begins to be utilized for industrial and residential development. Also sparks an increase f roads highways and parking lots to accommodate cars and drivers. This leaves farmers with lands that are not economical to cultivate, thus forcing them to abandon their plots and seek employment elsewhere. With the vast reduction of cropland and individuals willing to continue work in the field the country is forced to import a large majority of their crops. The effect of largely populated countries like China to require the importation of crops would be that is causes a strain on the global economy. Also the subsequent rise the world grain prices may destabilize governments in low-income, grain-importing countries (pgs. 316-317).

Continuous rapid economic growth has raised Malaysia from an agricultural and commodity-based low-income economy to a successful middle-income economy. As a mixed economy, Malaysia has elements of a free market economy nevertheless with intervention government. Malaysia's economic activity consist of a mixture of sectors whereas mixed of capitalism and socialism The strong economic performance has helped improve the quality of life for Malaysians and supported advances in education, health, infrastructure, housing and public amenities and others.