What Are The Arguments For And Against Gender Selection Essay

In the 1990’s there were “116 boys born for every 100 girls” in South Korea (Shin). Gender imbalances also existed in China and India and if selective abortions were outlawed, there may have been “112 million” more girls in Asia (Shin). No doubt, many Korean held tightly to their “Buddhist traditions,” but years later, laws changed, allowing daughters to inherit equally from their parents as sons and prohibiting physicians from revealing a baby’s gender (Shin). As a result, the ratio between boys and girls closed and people began to understand how having a girl just as fortunate as having a boy. Many Korean couples are ecstatic if they find out they have a girl as daughters end up coming back home to care for them, work, and tend for their own kids.

I think gender roles are changing and will continue to change in the future. I do not think gender roles will go away but I do think they will be modified. Gender stereotypes will always be around because of females and males physical appearances, athletics, academics, moral-ethical, and self- satisfactions. The social role theory makes the differences seem larger because they have been exaggerated through our culture. If people follow the “roles” females and males are supposed to play then I believe they will not be gone in the future. I believe that men will always look down on women and think they cannot do something and that will motivate women to work harder to achieve that goal and surprise the men. I do not know why men or

2. I chose this test because I was interested in seeing what I thought about male/female roles.

Pro-life versus Pro-choice stands as the most prominent bioethical issue in American Society today. This ongoing argument of whether an woman has the right to her body and potential child has been previously rigously debated for decades. The arguemental topic of pro life versus pro choice often dances along the topic that the government has been attempting to become callous in women’s rights as a total. I stand with women on their choice of their body, and fully believe that the government dictating the right of a female to their body is not only both morally and ethically wrong, yet also extremely contradictory.

Abortion has been a big controversial topic in America back since further then 1973 in a Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade. The Religious ethics also has an influence both on personal opinion and on the greater debate over abortion. In 2010 Pazel analysis, “that women in their 20s accounted for the majority of abortions and had the highest” (Pazol, Karen, “Abortion Surveillance”, 2010) Jason C. mentions that modern technology has discovered the gender of the baby easily in early pregnancy can make the mother decide to keep it or not due to the fact of knowing the gender. (Greaves, Jason C. "Sex-Selective Abortion In The U.S”, 2013) Many people would argue about this topic about whether if one is against or with abortion. A solution is to

Destruction Today’s society is so fixated on discovering ways to scientifically improve and create life. Researchers have dedicated their entire life to finding ways to do these unthinkable tasks. Much like the scientists and researchers, Victor Frankenstein, from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, has dedicated his entire life and freedom to create life by his own hands. Scientific progresses, such as the creation of life and today’s genetic developments, for knowledge should not be performed due to the fact they have destroyed and will destroy people’s lives in the future.

Dena Davis in the 5th chapter of “Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures” explores the global attitudes, policies, and morality towards determination of sex. She begins with presenting empirical evidence of some preferences held in countries such as India or China where there is a clear desire for male children. This inclination is so deeply held that mothers can be socially and physically harmed when, by pure biological chance, they fail to produce a male child. Davis and others allow sex selection in these cases, purely in the interest of harm reduction of mothers and their daughters born into such a situation.

The WHO states that there are three core motivations for engaging in sex determination and sex selection which include “medical reasons such as preventing the birth of children affected or at risk of X-linked disorders; family balancing reasons where couples choose to have a child of one sex because they already have one or more children of the other sex; and gender preference reason often in favor of male offspring stemming from cultural, social, and economic bias in favor of male children and as a result of policies requiring couples to limit reproduction to one child, as in China.” In countries such as India and China, it is apparent that women can be harmed by sex selection

So after the doctor determine the gender of the baby, which can easily be done by removing a cell from the embryo after it has fertilized for several days, the cell the gets tested to identify the gender. If the embryo happens to be a male, the doctors can then help parents to choose a healthy girl embryo to implant into the mom’s womb. Couples who are unable to have children because they would come out with genetic diseases would appreciate this chance to start a family. Genetic diseases would be screened out so that the baby could be born without carrying any genetic diseases. Giving them the opportunity to create a healthy baby. Not only it would save the child from suffering, reduce medical costs, but the parents also would not have to bare the pain that comes with having a sick

Prenatal diagnosis being used as a term for abortion and sex selection is difficult to view because of the polar opposites that exist towards its morality. The best way to tackle this issue is thru virtue ethics. Each have different motives for the abortion. However, each have selfish ambitions for the future. Sex selection in one case, Ann, should consider that the child can be happy in the event there is no disease. Likewise, if the child does have the disease the child still holds equal to humanity for with or without disease we are all human and deserve life. This act is therefore immoral. June is self-interested purely based on personal feelings, hence, is immoral due to the fact that selfishness is not virtuous.

Let me give you a scenario; It’s 3:00am. Rushing down the halls of a hospital you are on your way to support a person who is doing one of the most beautiful and complex things in life. Giving birth. You are the doctor in the room. Cutting the umbilical cord you hand the mother her child. She smiles up at you with tear rimmed eyes and you wrap the child up in a blanket and hold out to her a beautiful baby _____. Boy or girl? It doesn’t really matter which you say so long as you say one or the other, right? Within a few moments after birth and a quick scan between the legs of the child will enable you to develop a gender label for the child that they will carry for the rest of their life relevant to their sex.

There is also the surprise of finding out the gender at time of birth. Not only are the parents delighted in the surprise at the moment of birth, but they’re just plain grateful that they’ve been blessed with a healthy child. By being able to determine gender, according to Freeman, we’re cheapening this, and making childbirth into a mere consumer choice. In the end, children are a gift, a gift of nature.

Although PGD is a relatively new procedure, there are several ethical questions surrounding its use. One question is, "Should parents be allowed to choose characteristics for their children that are not related to disorders such as their baby’s eye color, personality, or even the sex of their baby?" [Wekesser,1996]. Until the genes responsible for inherited traits such as the previously mentioned are mapped, this is not an issue. If scientists do not know where the gene is located, they are unable to create a test determining the presence of the gene. However, because we do know how the sex of a child is determined, a specific gender can be screened for. Many believe that this should

The textbook identifies four approaches to gender development: biological, interpersonal, cultural, and critical. Define each theory. Then answer the following question: which of the theoretical approaches to gender do you find the most valid? Be sure to include at least two examples from your own experience as well as two scholarly sources to back up your claim.

Ever since the dawn of time, women and men have been associated with specific gender roles that can be seen controversial in the eyes of many. Traits and roles associated with a specific gender can be either innate or learned over time. Looking into the deeper concept of gender roles and stereotypes, it is clear that these fixed gender roles are not naturally born with, but rather taught, learned, or influenced by external forces.