What Are The Benefits Of Paying College Athletes

In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.

One benefit of paying college athletes it provides a needed income for athletes. College athletes spend a total of 90 hours a week, with their sport and schooling. (Anderson, “Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid”). That is the equivalent of working two full time jobs and a side job on the weekends (Anderson, “Top Ten Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid”). So these student

There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play.

Some may say that paying college athletes is a poor idea considering they have the reputation for being cheaters or only interested in what they want. “...The argument against allowing pay to student athletes arises mainly from greed and self-interest” (Text 1 lines 41-42). Regardless this is not always the case as some students need money and that the greedy ones are actually the coaches. Scholarships can be taken away, forcing students to look for jobs and struggle to find a balance between school and work. Last, The NCAA has an awful reputation for going against the law and not giving financial assistance to students for impractical reasons. It should be noted that by these reasons athletes should be paid for their participation in sports.

Whether or not college athletes should get paid has been a highly debated and talked about topic for the past few years. Some people believe that the athletes, attending some of the most prestigious schools in the country and having the privilege to play nationally televised games should be grateful of a quality education, free of charge. But there is a growing number of people that believe that college athletes are being cheated out of billions of dollars of yearly revenue for their schools and the NCAA. People will say that for student athletes college is all paid for with scholarships, but how do they afford nice things when they don't have time for a job? College athletes have been

College athletes should get paid for playing. Also playing in a game is like having a job. You should also get paid for something you love doing. Also getting paid for something you love to do makes you play it longer and better. They should get paid for playing because they can make money in college sports. The rest of the colleges should get paid for playing sports in college, so they can have money in their college years. They can provide for their family and make more money. It will be better to play sports for money.

If college athletes were to get paid for playing sports then where would that leave their education? Their education would go down the drain because they could care less about school work as long as they are getting paid to play a sport. Student comes first in student-athlete. If a college athlete does not succeed in sports then they would need a skill to fall back on. Not all students will make it to the pros. Students are not professional athletes. Their sports included with their education can possibly be an avenue for them to get to the pros where they then can be paid. College sports are not careers or professions at that point in time. Their education should be first and foremost in their game plan. Worrying about money can distract them from their concentration on their academics which will pay long term dividends. Many college coaches emphasize the importance of education first. Parents and students are paying for a good education preparing for a profitable future. Sports pros don’t and cant guarantee how long their run will last. Then the money is gone especially if they don’t plan ahead.

Whether or not college athletes should be paid is a topic that is much debated recently. Some athletes even want to form unions so they can have the rights to complain about working conditions and their pay, or lack of pay. While some people believe college athletes should be paid, it would be a grave mistake to pay college athletes. Athletes play when they’re just little kids with a dream and it is their job to make that dream come true. They do this by being the best they can, by vigorously training almost every day. They play through middle school and through high school so they can ultimately show their talents and get into great intellectual and athletic schools. You should graduate in whatever field of school you are interested in. that is their duty to themselves, they work to get the pay checks later on in life. If I paid an elementary school student to play for me they wouldn’t want to go to high school, and if I paid a high school student they wouldn’t want to go to college, if I paid a college student to play for me they wouldn’t want to go and become a professional.

College athletes should not be paid to participate in sports at the collegiate level because it is a choice, they receive some form of scholarship, and it would cost more money. To begin with, one article suggests that the student has the choice to play sports. All colleges offer a variety of different majors and minors to choose from. College is not just about sports, it is also about getting your education, whether you take it seriously or not (Let’s Not Pay College Athletes, Chudacoff). Furthermore, Smith states that college athletes receive some form of scholarship. On top of having their tuition paid for, they also receive benefits, like room and boarding fees waived and their textbooks paid for. These athletes get to enjoy going to college

900 million dollars. College athletics today are a large part of American society in entertainment. This directly results in enormous revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating colleges which currently fuels the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. College athletes do not deserve any extra payment by any means because they are already receiving large amounts of payment through large scholarships, and extra payment would demoralize the integrity of collegiate sports.

Paying college athletes is a very controversial subject. There are pro’s and con’s to both sides of the subject. In my unprofessional opinion I believe that college athletes should be paid. Coming from a student athlete I know how much hard work and dedication is required to be successful on the field/court wherever the sport is taken place, let alone in the classroom. In 2011-2012 the NCAA reported $876.1 million dollars in revenue. Basketball generated roughly $293 million, baseball generated roughly $419 thousand and football the rest. The University of Texas generated more than $93 million in 2011-2012.(“How Much Money Do College Sports Generate?” ) I believe the NCAA makes more than enough money to have a flat rate pay for each player

Collegiate sports have been a huge American pastime. Since the beginning of college level sports people have debated if college athletes should paid. College athletes should be paid because there sport requires them to work year round, therefore they do not have time to get money from a normal job. Also the hardwork and dedication it takes to be a college athlete should be rewarded because not a lot of people can go that far in their career. While it may be true that college sports are run through a school however the school gets money from these events and put elsewhere.

Another argument in the case for college athletes to be paid would be that the scholarships that are offered to athletes aren’t enough to cover the lost wages they would gain from working a job. Even though some athletes are offered full ride scholarships to great universities, they aren’t enough to pay their rent and other bills that they have. With athletes committing so much time for sports they do not have the time to get a job and pay for their bills and other things they need. This puts more strain on the athletes and can cause them to drop out of their respective sports and when that happens they ultimately lose their scholarships. College athletics are more demanding than a full-time job should pay their athletes for their services provided to the university they play for. The wages lost by athletes at universities are even greater than those working typical eight-hour days. Since athletes, football in particular, commit an immense amount of time to their sports they could be obtaining a wage far greater than the amount of the scholarship they obtained for attending and participating in sports at a university. Another point to be made would be that only a small portion of the people associated with college athletics receive full scholarships. This means that not only are athletes committing so much time and effort for sports, they must pay out of pocket for the portion that their respective

Here are some cons on if college athletes do get paid. College athletes already get paid quite a bit of money by scholarships alone that pay for the schooling and where they live. The athletes pretty much get paid for playing on the team but the money goes to school payments and other things. If they did get paid then other students would probably say something about it. Even if a student ,who doesn’t play sports but still has a full ride scholarship for academics, doesn’t get paid for going there and doing these things for the college then they might get mad and protest or even go to a different school. College athletes getting paid simply detracts the purity of the game. This shows that some fans won’t go because if they didn’t get paid then

            If college students are spending their time playing these sports and not working, they should be getting paid for it. Not only are these students forfeiting their time to study, talk to friends, and even relax after classes, but they are missing an opportunity to have jobs. “Players’ relationships to the school they play for should be spelled out in an individualized pay-for-service contract rather than an NCAA-standardized letter of intent that impinges on basic freedoms” (Marx, 475). The NCAA requires that students are enrolled full time and play football to gain the scholarship offered. There is an argument by Hartenstine on this subject that “Some 15 percent played professional football as a first career, but 15 percent were corporate executives, 13