What Are The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing Ethical

All drugs have dangers due to certain chemicals and substances. Because of animal testing, researchers have found another alternative to testing on humans.

Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No

Animals do not suffer from the same diseases that us humans have, for example curing heart failure induced by cutting a dogs aorta will not help to cure heart failure caused by a build-up of cholesterol in human arteries. We waste animal lives everyday and for what? The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage of drugs approved for human use, half end up being relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in tests on animals. This makes it extremely dangerous to humans, because animal testing is not dependable, it can cause serious side effects to humans that weren’t an issue to the animals during testing.

There is a moral imperative to diminish suffering in all sentient beings, but when difficult choices have to be made, human suffering has to come first…” (Juan Carlos Marvin, 2015)

Another point to consider is that drugs that are safe on animals are not always safe on humans. In 2006, six men took a drug in a clinical trial and in two hours it caused life threatening and disastrous side effects. The same drug had been previously been given to monkeys at a higher dose and showed no side effects. That is only one of the 92% of drugs that are safe for animals but fail clinical trial. This shows that just because it's safe on animals does not mean it’s safe for human use.

“Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (11 Facts). Animal testing is a very flawed creation in today’s world. This innovation has caused much harm to many animals while also hurting the opinions of animal activists around the world. Animal testing is also known as the use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials (Biology Online). The use of animal testing has been around for throughout all of history, it also carries its disadvantages as they diminish the lives of many animals along with their unspoken opinion while also having some advantages, and lastly this notion is very expensive (Scutti).

Animals are very different than humans and therefore they make poor test subjects. They make poor test subjects because of the cellular, metabolic, and anatomic differences. Animals act, look, and are made very differently compared to humans. How will you be sure the product will not be harmful just because it didn’t hurt an animal? Approximately 92% of experimental drugs are dangerous of humans even though it did not affect the animal. [Cruelty]

To begin, one of the most important reasons why animal testing should be unacceptable, is because the human species is very different compared to any other animal; therefore, they make unreliable test subjects. For example, according to PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), they found that nearly 150 clinical trials [human tests] of treatments, to reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, have been undertaken, and all of them failed, despite all the animal tests being successful (Should Animals Be Used for

Thalidomide is a medicine that is used for nausea. Many women who used it did not know that they were pregnant. Once they gave birth, they realized their child was severely deformed and ask how that could be? Scientists gave Thalidomide to pregnant rabbits and also gave birth

“All you have to do is think of any major medical advances of the last 100 years to see the benefit of animal testing,”(Morrison, par.8). Without testing, we could never guess if the drugs were safe enough to be used on humans. Secondly, animals make up 36% (excluding insects and water animals) of living species. There is a large supply of animals that can be used for medical purposes, close to “26 million animals in the U.S. are being used for animal testing,”(Finter,

Scientific research is always evolving, constantly progressing, improving and being modernised in order to reflect changes in social and cultural morals and values as well as to adjust to the relevant issues in the current society.

Animal testing is ineffective. After testing medications on animals that were approved for human use, 90% of them were proved unsuccessful and harmful to humans. Rats, mice, dogs, cats, rabbits, and more are used for testing. We are not the same! Our makeup is different and we should not trust products that are said to be safe or helpful if they were tested on animals. If we want to know if certain products are okay for humans to use, then we should test on humans; we are the ones using

Even though animal testing has only recently become a topic of discussion, animal research has been around since 500 B.C (“Animal Testing”). In the olden days, animal research was used to better understand the functions of the body. Greek scientists performed testing on living animals. During animal testing they examined nerves and tendons in order to further understand their functions (“Animal Testing: A Long”). Today in the United States, about 26 million animals are tested for medical and commercial reasons each year. According to the Foundation for Research, animal species that are tested on include: rats, dogs, mice, nonhuman primates, and rabbits (“Animal Research Behind Top Drugs”). Results from these tests are used to create medicine,

Not only can scientists create human skin, but they can also do the same with organs. One experiment in advanced stages of development is microfluidic chips, or “Human-on-a-Chip” (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” 1). These chips are just 2 centimeters wide and contain tissue samples from different parts of the body that are linked by microchannels through which a blood substitute flows. This mimics pathways and organ processes in the body. This method is also an advantage because of the reduction in the costs compared to using animals for testing, which is extremely costly (2). However, there are limitations to this so called “Human-on-a-Chip.” Microfluidic chips limit the ability of data collected compared to an animal model. Scientists

There are many different opinions about whether using animals for testing different cosmetics and medicines is humane or not. There are many different pros and cons for each side of the argument of whether testing on animals is a good thing and is beneficial or if it is in humane and cruel. I believe that testing on animals is good and is beneficial to scientific research. Testing on animals has allowed scientists to create many different cures and treatments for many different diseases and sicknesses. Medicines that have been tested on animals has helped save the lives of many people with different diseases. Animal testing helped with finding treatments for breast cancer, brain injury, malaria, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis and many more. This is one of the benefits from testing on animals.