What Are The Pros And Cons Of Electric Cars

The world produces around 85 million barrels of oil each day. About a quarter of that percentage goes to the United States of America, which is used up mostly by means of transportations. Most people get around from place to place using a car, a car that is powered by fuel. Everywhere one goes driving, they will eventually run into a gas station but not a charging station for electric cars. Regular cars, burn off fuel that produce emissions (carbon, nitrogen, sulfur) that pollute and harm the environment. Although, there are some positives about switching there are also some problems that could appear but could be fixed. Electric cars have the potential to reduce the amount of pollution in the environment, boost the national economy and help

Electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles assist with emissions released into the air by traditional modes of transportation. Car emissions have been attributed to global warming and the deterioration of a healthy atmosphere. With more drivers purchasing electric and hybrid electric vehicles, we have been able to decrease these harmful emissions. By using electricity or a combination of electricity and gas, electric vehicles operate with fewer pollutants.

“We can break our dependence on oil…and become the first country to have one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015,” President Obama said in his January 2011 State of the Union address (Institute for Energy Research 1). While this may sound promising, the practicality and merit in achieving this goal remains unclear. Auto manufacturers have been working on plans for electric cars for years, especially the three largest companies in the US: Chevrolet, Chrysler, and Ford. These companies have been hoping that the development of electric cars would create a sort of lifestyle change for consumers, both weaning the U.S. off of its dependence on foreign oil and breathing life into the market for auto sales at the same time. Electric cars are often sold as zero emissions, but technically that is only true once they are charged and in terms of their tailpipe emissions. After all, they have to get their energy from somewhere and, more often than not, the electricity used for charging is supplied by traditional coal fired power plants. The real question then is whether the source and amount of energy required to build and supply an electric car with power is actually cleaner and more economical than a traditional combustion automobile. As it turns out, the answer is both unexpected and fairly complicated. In order to assess whether the use of

Electric vehicles should be big a consideration for the world. Our planet is suffering a lot due to climate change. It’s caused by burning fossil fuel and releasing its gas into the air and most cars today run on fossil fuel and it’s damaging our planet. Electric cars are clean energy vehicles, meaning it doesn’t damage the world. This is the main reason while society needs to consider manufacturing more electric cars and make them affordable and more well known. If a big part of the world’s population used electric cars instead of cars that runs of gas, it would be very beneficial to the world. But even with this huge benefit that

In light of the constant rises in petroleum prices, climate changes and an economy recovering from the effects of the recent economic downturn, consumers have started to reconsider the usage of electric cars (Global EV Outlook, 2013). Electric Vehicles [EV] have been around since the 1830s, yet it is only recently that countries have experienced an increase in their production thus redefining tomorrow’s automobile and transportation industry. This year, the global production of EV is predicted to rise by 67% (IHS, 2014).

Just because they do not burn fuel directly within the engine itself does not mean that it does not require said fuel to run. The electricity that power these cars comes from power plants that burn fossil fuels to produce the electricity to power the cars. This electricity then must change forms once again when the electricity is then converted to chemical energy to charge the battery and again when this energy is converted to power the engine. In total, 75% of the energy is lost to form changes, leaving only 25% to run the car. Additionally, taxpayers are paying the government, which is using that money to fund the marketing of electric cars. The federal government is in $15 trillion of debt all for an idea that electric cars are more “green”, even though most Americans do not even have the money to purchase an electric car. Finally, natural gas would work much better than electric or fossil fuel powered cars. It gives off far less carbon emissions and reduces nitrogen oxide, particulate matter, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and greenhouse gas emissions, which can dramatically improve the state of the

Gas powered cars are one of the major causes of global warming , and air pollution. Gas powered cars are able to create a lot of carbon dioxide that harm the environment. These cars can also spill certain fluids that can harm the environment. Some of these fluids are motor-oil, gasoline and brake fluid. These fluids can harm humans as well as animals, and can pollute our water systems. Electric cars on the other hand are better for the environment. They use half the energy of a gas powered car, so they don’t cause as much pollution in the air. They also use cleaner energy; electricity, which doesn’t harm the environment as much as

It also compares these negative attributes of the electric car to the gasoline counterpart on the amount of miles it can travel on a tank of gas and the sole convenience of refueling. Another thought to consider is that the electricity needed to charge electric vehicles need to come from somewhere and that somewhere is usually a coal power plant. It may be worse for the environment because the coal power plant providing the source of energy needed for the charge is not emission-free. This information also adds concerns to the validation of the beneficial side of electrical vehicles. According to an article published on theguardian by Anrica Deb, “Electric cars rely on regular charging from the local electricity network. The power plants providing that energy aren’t emission-free; even in California, 60% of electricity came from burning fossil fuels in 2015, while solar and wind together made up less than 14%.” In other words, the energy used to charge these electric cars still require an outside source to power this vehicles. The author gives statistical data on the percentage of where the electricity comes from in California and reveals staggering data on other sources of energy like solar and wind energy. The author

For many years, the only way to fuel a car has been through gasoline. Many people believe that it the best form of operation, but recently alternatives to gas have surfaced. Today we opt to purchase hybrid, solar, and electric cars instead of gas fueled. The problem lies in the difference of efficiency of gas fueled cars versus alternative fuel options. Do we need gas fueled cars? Is it worth the extra money for an electric or hybrid car? Do gas fueled cars really affect the environment? Will getting rid of gas fueled cars cause a loss of jobs ? People need to understand that the continuation of gas fueled cars are detrimental to the environment. The replacement of gas fueled vehicles is best for the natural world.

1. No emissions. One of the big reasons EVs are so attractive to some is that they emit absolutely no emissions. If you are worried about your direct impact on the environment, an electric vehicle will allay those concerns.

Gas cars and electric cars have a myriad of differences. For example, Electric cars can’t go as far of a distance on a full charge compared to a gas car with a full gas tank. Gasoline cars can be refilled with gas in a short amount of time while electric cars take a long time to recharge the battery. Electric cars are more expensive than common gas cars. Since there aren’t many electric cars being driven around, repair shops will probably be unfamiliar with repairing them compared to gasoline cars so repairs might take longer or something else

The cost of preserving electric cars is lower than the cost of preserving cars fueled by conventional gasoline. The price of fuel varies a lot depending on the military and political situation in countries that provide oil. Even if we do not consider it, one month of driving a gasoline fueled car would cost you about $3,500. Given that you drive about 15,000 miles per year, and buy gasoline at $3.50 per gallon. Mean while, driving an electric car would cost you only $39 per month. Not even counting fuel costs, conventional vehicles call for transmission repairs, regular technical inspections, and so on (EVgo). There for people who want to save money on gas and maintenance electric cars is the way to go.

The developments of electric cars are associated with numerous benefits to the different stakeholders who are involved in their operations. Among the benefits include the environmental benefits where the use of electric cars has eliminated emission of dangerous gases that are emitted by fuel based cars. The use of electric cars also has numerous health benefits to the public as some of the gases that are realized by fuel based cars are feared to be dangerous to the human health. Wolf, Ingo et al, also explains that electric cars are economical in the long run as the cost of electricity is low than the fuel and gas prices that changes with time (269) . Due to the ease of optimizing electric cars in comparison to fuel cars, the cars are also considered to be much safer to their users in comparison to fuel cars. During accidents, some of the fuel based cars explode as the fuels are flammable.

Electric vehicles have been around for decades, but the public has been slow to adopt the use of them. These vehicles have become more easily available to the public in the past three years (Zhou et al., 2015). The new focus on greenhouse gases and carbon footprints has brought a push from the government for cleaner transportation methods. The transportation sector accounts for one-third of greenhouse gases in the United States (Krupa et al., 2013). The use of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles could reduce greenhouse gases by 20% to 50% compared to traditional vehicles (Axsen & Kurani, 2010). In the past year, there has been a higher level of mainstream adoption but are far off from the United States’ goal of one-million plug-in electric vehicles on the road by 2015 (Krause, Carley, Lane, & Graham, 2013). This lack of adoption may be due to several reasons, such as, lack of knowledge, fuel and vehicle costs, range concerns, and social influences.

Cars are used by many people all over the world to get them from place to place. Most of these cars are powered by gasoline, some are powered by diesel, and some newly cars are powered electrically. Many people believe that electric cars can be the future of the car industry, but will most other car companies hurt from this? Electric cars use an electric motor to power the car instead of an engine, the owner of an electric car recharges the battery inside the car to power the motor. According to Tesla Motors, an electric car company, “Tesla possesses a high powered wall connector, which completely recharges the car in under 4 hours, and at max power, the high powered wall connector charges at a speed of 56 miles range per hour”(Tesla Motors “Tesla Vehicles Provide Attractive Environmental Benefits” 6). While electric cars do not have as much range as gas-powered cars, no emissions are made from the electric battery, which in result ends up benefiting to the environment.