What Are The Similarities Between Literature And Cinema

1390 Words6 Pages
It is surely ironic that film studies have had a productive relation with literary theory over the past decade such that both have influenced each other, it has not had the same kind of relation with theatre/performance studies, photography and the visual arts. Nowhere is this more evident than in the separation of the study of Australian theatre and filmmaking in critical discourse. This is despite the fact that the theatre has constituted a reference point for film producers from pre-sound cinema days to the present in terms of film properties, script-writers, acting talent, and directors.
There are few similarities and dissimilarities between literature and cinema. Moreover, they have been complementing each other since the birth of cinema. During the earlier eras the films were adapted from the books written by different authors, as there are few film-makers who experimented with the script. However, both the books and movies exist in the written form. A script of movie is at first produced in written form and then made into a film. Therefore, they share this first similarity.
Literature and cinema have both similarities and dissimilarities. However, cinema requires much more physical and mental effort than literature. As while writing
…show more content…
This is the basic difference between literature and cinema. Literature and cinema have both similarities and dissimilarities. However, cinema requires much more physical and mental effort than literature. As while writing a book the author only has to imagine it and write it down, but when it is adapted into a movie the director, producer and screenplay writer have to work together to create the scenes, make the special effects, and of course find the perfect actors/actresses for each major and minor roles. The director and producer have to make all the arrangements ranging from a pin to a

More about What Are The Similarities Between Literature And Cinema

Open Document