What Are The Sons Of Liberty Not Terrorists

The sons of liberty are terrorist. One reason that they are terrorist is that they use violence to further their ideas by that they burnt down oliver’s business, and trashed his home and there was no need to hurt the business or his home, that took it way too far.. The other reason is that they used violent actions more than once by them tarring and feathering the merchant or customers that did not honor boycotts of british goods and they burnt down oliver’s business and they don’t need to tar and feather people, that is just cruel.

I believe the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling against the British Government and declaring war. It all started prior to the French and Indian war (1756-1763), the colonists possessed substantial self-reliance and liberty. Following the conflict, the British Empire strongly challenged the self-reliance and liberty, and also resolved that the colonists directly pay taxes into the imperial chest to help reduce the huge debt from the war.

There is a debate that has gone on for decades and is still without a definitive answer. That burning question is as follows: were the original Patriots justified in their cause for revolution? The obvious answer is yes, the Patriot cause for revolution was justified. This is for multiple reasons but there are three big ones. The first is that the 13 colonies were taxed very unfairly. This is because they had no one in parliament to represent them, so when they were taxed, they had no voice in it. The second reason is that there were multiple acts imposed upon the colonies that were unfair and borderline unethical. These include the intolerable acts, specifically the quartering acts, which violated what you and I see as basic rights. The third

American colonists should support the Declaration of Independence and the Patriots in the Revolutionary War. Great Britain was taxing the American colonists because of Britain’s great debt from the French and Indian War. Britain made the quartering act, the stamp act, townshend act, and the tea act. This is taxation without representation and it was unjust. The Patriots were angry and rightfully so. The King was making the colonists pay taxes on imported goods to decrease his country’s debt, the Patriots were outraged and wanted freedom.

The attacks dramatize the destruction and construct America as the wealthy super power it is, clearly these attacks were criminal acts and the attackers must be brought to justice through the Supreme Court and internationally.

The Sons of Liberty was an organization that was created in the Thirteen American Colonies.The secret group was formed to protect the rights of the colonists and to fight taxation by the British government.By the end of the year the Sons of Liberty existed to every colony.The Sons of Liberty formed out of a number of smaller protest groups in 1765.The first group was formed out of the Loyal Nine in Boston with other groups soon forming in New York and Connecticut.

John Brown's actions at Pottawatomie Creek and Harper's Ferry can be seen as acts of terrorism by a person or peoples opinion, but a closer study of modern and historic violent actions show he was a freedom fighter. Certainly, this is factual because there is no actual definition of terrorism, it is simply an opinion on someone's actions. Therefore, it is almost irrelevant for one be convicted a terrorist if no one can actually have a justified reasoning behind their choices.

The second reason John Brown is a terrorist is because he had a raid at the Pottawatomie Creek in Kansas. He killed pro slave people clearly because he did not agree with their views on slavery, but is that a truly a justifiable reason to take another mans life? John Brown had the right mind to abolish slavery, but there could have been a better way, like protesting to the point not even the government can refuse since the people are a, “Great beast”, as said by Alexander Hamilton.

The first reason why John Brown was not a terrorist is because the acts he has devoted to and the reasons why he committed them, does not make him a terrorist. One of the acts he was devoted to was killing anybody that came in his way at Harper’s Ferry. That is not terrorism because he is not striking

The Sons of Liberty took place. They were a group of people against the British. They took place in 1765. They were too help the colonist. Samuel and John Adams were both part of the sons of liberty. They were brothers. The sons of liberty were very helpful to the colonist. They reacted with anger. They were tired of the taxes being put on the things they buy.

1)This is protecting in their natural rights to life and property. The Americans have also committed treason by boycotting and throwing Goods overboard, such as, tea in the British Tea Party.(Doc. 4) The American colonists were not justified in rebelling against British taxes because

The Sons of Liberty was the name given to a group of patriots who worked underground to defend the rights of the colonists against the British government in the years before the American Revolution. They represented the ideals of liberty and justice, approving all the grievances and complaints of the colonists. Although the name was first used during the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1765, it continued to be stated to whenever colonists came together to fight new British laws, and especially taxes. The Sons of Liberty became an organization capable of getting people together to protest British impositions in a very effective manner. The slogan “No taxation without representation” was their official motto and the “tar and feathering” was

The Sons of Liberty were a secret group. They did start the Boston Tea Party; the sons threw the tea into the Boston Harbor. They did that because they refused the taxes that the British people gave to them. The sons of the Liberty liked to start nonsense with their brainwashing information which caused an uproar to a lot of things as well. They wanted to be free of Britain because they did not think that these taxes were fair. There also was a protest to the Stamp Act as well. The reason they did that was because the British were making people pay taxes on their paper that they used. Were they wrong for taking a stand and doing what they did? Some people might think yes, and some might say no. I would say that they obviously were being taxed on nonsense things because the British Empire was being extremely unfair.

Firstly, the Boston massacre was a good representation of tyranny spread throughout the citizens. The propaganda in document 4 illustrates the brutal shooting executed by the redcoats. The Boston Massacre aided in spreading the word of oppression and propaganda to the colonist. Colonies began to view Britain differently in regards to their ruling. Another reason was that colonists’ arduous petitions were answered with constant oppression. In document 7, The first Continental Congress tried to reason with the king after he declared the declaratory act.. This is important because the colonist believed that the king should work for the people instead of an act of volition. Moreover, leaders who undermine their citizens are unfit to rule. When the colonist petitioned for Independence, the King responded with hostility, in document 12. This event spurred the actions of the Second Continental Congress to declare independence from Britain. King George rejecting their proposal was another sign of insufficient ruling. Even though the colonist were justified in some aspects, some think they were not

The attackers were Islamic terrorists from Saudi Arabia and several other Arab nations. Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist organization were allegedly acting the U.S. in retaliation for their support of Israel, their involvement in the Persian Gulf War and their military presence in the Middle East. Some of the terrorists lived in the United States for more than a year and had taken flying lessons at American flight schools. The others had snuck into the country in the months before September 11th and were considered the “muscle” in the operation. They smuggled box-cutters and knives through the loose security at three East Coast airports and boarded four different airliners bound for California, they chose these flights because they were filled with jet fuel for the long flight across the country. After takeoff, they raided the cockpit of the planes and took control, doing this turned the normal passenger jets into huge missiles.