What Caused The Egyptian Revolution

Many times when people revolt against the government, it leaves the country in a worse spot that it was before. Throughout history there have been many revolutions in many different places. Two of the most significant have been the American Revolution, from the 1700’s, and more recently the Egyptian revolution from 2011. Both of these revolutions have many similarities within each other, but they also have many actions to contrast. The topics being compared include; how the revolutions started. The demands of the revolting groups. Lastly, what the two groups did to protest against the government.

In France in the late 18th century information was spread by the use of public spheres, books, newspapers, coffee houses, and salons. In France there was a realm of common discourse and every person was expected to have an opinion on the issues of the day. The ideas of the France Revolution were spread through public realm. When people see that one nation is having success protesting with nonviolent acts on the television, people inother countries are more inclined to walk the streets asking for changes. During the French Revolution, once the proletariats found out the lifestyle of the nobles and they could not afford to buy basic necessities through the public sphere, a revolution occurred. Once people realized the extravagance the nobles lived through, people got angry. During the Arab spring, social media changed everything. Due to technology, leaders would find it nearly impossible to fire against protesters because CNN would be covering it on live TV.2 When the Arab leaders choose to fire there was a lot of criticism. Nothing could stay secret for very long due to the invention of the internet. Information was given instantly and it was difficult to deny the abuses on the people there. It was much more staggering to watch a video of someone being beheaded for a crime than to read about it in a pamphlet. People began to realize there was a better world out there and they started to rebel. The poor helpless commoners in France and Arab nations had nothing to lose and everything to gain through a

Political movements, social movements, and economic movements all have a part in pushing colonists farther towards the Revolutionary War. What was the cause from these movements that pushed us to revolt though? Was it the strict laws Britain placed of America? Or was it the even stricter taxes placed on tea, and other items? Well there is only one way to find out. To keep reading this essay.

History shows that throughout revolutions, though varied outcomes, all originated with the oppressive treatment of civilians and the consequensive rebellion. Revolutions like the French, American, and Mexican all came about as a result of the enlightenment era. as a result, these countries, “suffered weak economies due to a lack of political experience. “

There has been a rebellion going on for years now. This rebellion included people that broke the laws. My information will be coming from the passages “Cairo: My City, Our Revolution”, “Lolita in Tehran”, and “Persepolis”

The Arab spring has generated much controversy as a result of demonstrating that countries that were apparently peaceful were actually determined to remove their governments and install a new ideology that would be compassionate with regard to its people. Some nations actually went as far as to put oppressors down and to bring reform throughout their countries. However, it rapidly became clear that peace was far away when considering that new leaders were unable to satisfy people's needs and that the masses wanted to be provided with more power.

* Then at least three sentences of FR, Arab Spring background/historical context that sets up the thesis

No one has ever changed the world by doing what the world has told them to do. In fact, many of our recent inventions, rights, political systems, and comforts have come into existence through the sweats and tears of revolution, an often chaotic and transformative event that attempts to change a nation, society, or world. And though it can be argued that revolution results in the bloodshed of masses, it is imperative to understand that self-aggrandizement of unfair leaders and unequal distribution of rights have often been the case in history when revolution is non-present. And only through revolutions such as the

Throughout history, there has been a pattern of many political revolutions; some as complex and violent as the French Revolution, others as peaceful as the Brazilian, and others neutral, such as the Iranian Revolution. Revolutions in history always demonstrate similar fundamentals or principles. In this case, the French and Iranian Revolution were influential political revolutions commenced because of abuse of power and shared several similarities, but there are significant differences between the two. Both French and Iranian Revolution were remarkably involved and made up of several messy phases. Although both revolutions share various similarities, the French Revolution is not justified due to the fact that some of the main reasons or conditions that set forth the revolution worsened and drastically drifted; where as the Iranian Revolution differed from the French Revolution, because it began and focused on everyone, religion, and disobedience.

Revolutions have occurred throughout history and continue to arise even in the present day. Many revolution happens because of the miscommunication between the government and its citizens. In the end, the outcome of revolutions are usually good but, sometimes it might not be what people want. In the following paragraphs, examples of the general causes and effects that creates a revolution will be discussed in order to illustrate how revolutions are mainly caused by the dispute between the regime and its citizen.

January 25, 2011 was the start of the Egyptian Revolution. Men and women gathered in Tahrir Square to hold a demonstration against President Mubarak’s regime to which there was a lot of political repression and economic and social stagnation that was associated with it. This left many of the Egyptian people to be very upset and eventually led to the gathering of people of Tahrir Square.

Throughout history, there is a pattern of many political revolutions; some as complex and violent as the French Revolution, others as peaceful as the Brazilian, and others neutral, such as the Iranian Revolution. Revolutions in history always demonstrate similar fundamentals or principles. In this case, the French and Iranian Revolution were influential political revolutions commenced because of abuse of power and shared several similarities, but there are significant differences between the two. Both French and Iranian Revolution were remarkably involved and made up of several messy phases. Although both revolutions share various similarities, the French Revolution is not justified due to the fact that some of the main reasons or conditions that set forth the revolution worsened and drastically drifted. The Iranian Revolution differed from the French Revolution, because it began and focused on everyone, religion, and disobedience.

Many revolutions have taken place throughout human history. Conflict is almost inevitable, as human beings have had a tendency to thirst for power since the beginnings of civilization. With the rise of monarchies, the “divine right of kings”, and social caste systems, disgruntlement with the government from subjected citizens is probable. A mean for substantial and exponential changes to the “system” is by way of revolution. Revolutionaries often are victims of suffering and hardships, imposed upon them by the government or societal norms. All revolutions share certain qualities, that often pertain to the “lower class” of a society’s discontentment with a certain sect of society that is perpetuated by a majority group. This could be the lower socioeconomic class unhappy with financially oppressive decisions made by a monarch, or a minority racial group vexed by their subjection to the majority. Often times, groups are led to revolt by specific means, whether starvation, abuse of rights or despotic laws and ruling.

Throughout history many societies have, and will likely continue to have revolutions as we as humans strive towards a utopian society. Each and every one of these revolution follows some pattern, a pattern that most often includes a great number of civilian casualties. But what is it that pushes such revolutions forward? Why have people risked and given their lives fighting against their own leadership? Looking at both the French Revolution and the Arab Spring can help uncover the answer to these questions, as for people to willingly risk their lives, they must have been living in destitute situations. Both of these societies did indeed have many social and economic problems, as well as a poor quality of life, specifically for the bottom class, or in the case of the French Revolution, the Third Estate. It is because of these issues that the people stood up to their leaders and demanded a better life, overtaking the government in the process.

Conflict Mapping the Tunisian Revolution from the perspective of the main advocates that took over this revolution, the youth of Tunisia through their participation in crucial events, reflected on the problems their country face in the transition to democracy. First the revolution was initiated by disillusioned youth who succeeded in bringing together a broad coalition of social and political forces against the Ben Ali’s regime. Second the coalition was able to bring down the regime due to longstanding and widespread discontent in the country that stemmed from factors such as: massive unemployment especially among the youth, unequal regional development and lack of equitable distribution of