What Does It Means To Be In A Collectivist Society

In source one, the writer evaluates how one must hold regard for others rights and freedoms and respect them and source three holds the opinion that collectivism on a small scale is acceptable but on a large scale it is dangerous. Both of these sources speak about how without collectivism, individualism can not prosper. Source two is different however, in that it shows a much more collectivist opinion. Although the views may not be in line with individuality, there are still some aspects of this ideology. If in an ant colony, One individual feels like they are more important than the others it will leave for chaos. However you also can not treat individuals as though they are nothing. You must be careful not to promote enough individualism so that the ideology spreads, but also be sure to provide enough so that each individual feels important. All three sources agree with the idea that collectivism and individualism are like ying and yang: Without one you can not have the

Meanwhile in collective societies they prioritise their decisions for good of the group above their own personal goals. In a business context collective societies will work better in groups with people they have a personal relationship with. While individualist societies can work well as individuals and in groups with people they do not know. This allows for quicker decision making but not knowing a colleague on a personal level may lead to less active participation. Collective mentality takes more time but more options are analysed in more depth which in some circumstances is more effective but less time efficient.

In Communications Between Cultures individualism and collectivism are described by researchers as “self-orientation versus collective orientation as one of the basic pattern variables that determine human action.” These differences can be found in family life, school, and workplace

“Acknowledges the fact that in individualistic cultures, ‘people are supposed to look after themselves and their family only’ while in collective cultures, ‘people belong to groups or collectives which are supposed to look after them in exchange for loyalty’”. (Theriault, 2016)

A similar struggle is seen in The Fountainhead. The main character of that novel, . Howard Roark, has to defend himself in court after dynamiting a government housing project that he designed. An agreement was made that the project would be built exactly as designed, but it wasn’t, so Roark made a protest against collectivism by destroying the project. He ends up in court. He then delivers a moving speech titled “The Soul of an Individualist”. In it he proclaims his individualism, and denounces collectivism as a parasitic system in which no one can achieve anything or truly live. “I came here to say that I do not recognize anyone’s right to one minute of my life. Nor to any part of my energy. Nor to any achievement of mine. No matter who makes the claim, how large

Individualism is the current of thinking that values the freedom and worth of the individual. The source from Adam Smith, states that individualism benefits humankind. The perspective of the source accepts and favours individualism but rejects collectivism because it calls for individualism as being a way for individuals to promote their self interests and to achieve an efficient economy. That a nation of individuals should not seek to make every one responsible for each other; but that individuals are only responsible for themselves. Supporters of individualism, like Adam Smith, see economic freedom as leading to the most efficient and beneficial economy for the greatest number of people, because it encourages competition and they assume

Ayn Rand’s novel puts Equality in a great position to start his new life with his new family. Ayn Rand’s story gives hope to all who want not to be conquered by their government and to have a say in what they believe in. If your government or society doesn’t like what you have to say, then it shows you can also walk right out the door if you don’t like what is happening. When you become a collectivist, you lose your individuality and almost become a slave and or a robot to the government and society. You lose your creativity and

To begin, Ayn Rand shows the negative side of collectivism with the creation of the main character Equality 7-2521. Rand’s strong beliefs had her create a whole character that is against the large idea of collectivism. In Anthem, it starts off by saying, “It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon a paper no others are to see. It is base and evil” (Rand 17). Collectivism portrays the idea of being an individual as a sin. Because Rand is being derogatory, she makes collectivism seem wrong. The character is breaking the rules that he grew up learning and being forced to obey. Throughout the book, Equality 7-2521 continues to take his own path and become an individual against collectivism. Rand explains in the story Anthem, “This is a great sin, to be born with a head which is too quick. It is not good to be different from our brothers, but it is evil to be superior to them” (Rand 21). The word “evil” is often associated with demons and the devil, so Rand's use of that word sets the tone of negativity. Collectivism makes the people feel guilty for being born with the ability to learn and comprehend schooling at a faster rate than others. This dystopian world is warped; instead of being praised and acknowledged for being advanced, they have to keep it to themselves and pretend to be normal when they aren't.

Imagine a society where individualism is non existent to the extent that the word “I” is not found in one’s vocabulary. Every person in this dystopian world exists only to serve for the greater collective being of mankind and not for themselves . In the novella Anthem by Ayn Rand this is exactly what happens, although the main character Equality 7-2521 is not interested in these collectivist ways. In this society it is unacceptable and unthought of to be an egoist yet somehow Equality breaks through the collectivist restrictions and discovers the thoughts and feelings of himself and not those of everyone else. Because of this it is impossible to have a completely collectivist society where not one person thinks otherwise.

In the book Anthem, one of the main themes is collectivism, the ideology that you, as the individual, is not what is important, but instead, it’s the society that is what matter, or at least what should matter. Many of the people who read it say that this book is crazy and where there is no love or personal opinions, the society is bad.

In today’s world, there are many disagreements on whether a collectivist society or an individualist society would be better and more beneficial for each country. Depict a world with no choice, no freedom, and everyone is equal. There would be no new discoveries, no creative ideas, nothing new. This doesn’t seem like a beneficial and enjoyable society to live in, so therefore, an individualistic society would be preferable. In Rand’s book Anthem and Shakespeare’s infamous play Romeo and Juliet, both stories contradict individualism and collectivism.

The article, Charlottesville and the Perils of Collectivism, talks about the protest in Charlottesville, Virginia and the dangers in the rise of collectivism from the neo-Nazis and neo-confederates. According to Thio, A & Taylor, J (2011), the symbolic interaction theory states that, “if members of the dominant group perceive minorities as undesirable or dangerous, the interaction between them is tense or superficial (p 63).” Throughout the article Boehm talked about white nationalism and the politically motivated violence that was brought in Charlottesville. As stated in the article collectivism was the real enemy as collectivism is “one cleverly disguised but nurtured by a group of people who profess to hate the idea (Boehm, 2017).” The

Collectivism¡¦s main argument is that society should not be controlled by people who are irresponsible. Hayek counters that point by stating that collectivism is nothing more than totalitarian in which individual freedoms are lost. He also states that the welfare and happiness of the society cannot be satisfied by a single plan (Hayek 63-64). This is especially true in countries that are very diverse in their people¡¦s education and culture. Collectivism also has the dilemma of ¡§who plans whom, who directs and

Collectivism is giving a group priority over each individual in it.This means that people are taught to be one person in communist sort of way.On page 19 it says: We are one in all and in one There are no men-only the great WE one indivisible, and forever, Of course, a society set up like that has a lot of holes because humans are just built to think for themselves. On page 23 it says “We love the science of things.” Which brings me to my conclusion.

“To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.” Quoted from American author Ralph Waldo Emerson, this encapsulates the very spirit of a natural human. In our natural state, we humans strive to continue building on our foundation. The foundation is different for each and every one of us, meaning different things will be built upon each of our foundations. This is humanity, what separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom. We strive to not only survive, but to live. To experience life in our own individual perspective is what makes us unique. In a society discouraging individualism, humanity is stripped away and replaced with synthetic interaction. Simply put, collectivism strips life away. People will not conform to what others think they should conform to, unless it is